yebyen

83 ms·

691.
by yebyen 8y ago
> It will continue to happen. I would like, if you are one of the entities with control over this situation, if you bet against this. How much will it cost me to get you, as a service provider, to start betting against this?
692.
by yebyen 8y ago
Are you implying that, when a hurricane strikes, no one drop of water can be responsible for the resulting devastation? (When in this case, to stretch the metaphor, the droplets all had strong profit incentives related to storing and making
693.
by yebyen 8y ago
I was going to say the AirPod strap, but it looks like those are sold by another company...
694.
by yebyen 8y ago
This can be done with plugins, kubernetes-plugin for example. I'm looking forward to seeing what they come up with. It was good to see knative on their roadmap! This could be something else majorly.
695.
by yebyen 8y ago
> The current legacy version of Jenkins needs to be restarted once a day by an administrator Is this true? Do you have a source that says this? We have a Jenkins instance that Kubernetes is configured to scale down from 1 replica to 0
696.
by yebyen 8y ago
If you had linked that comment in your first reply, I would have agreed with you and we probably wouldn't have had any of this to talk about :) A license granted by accident without consideration in return is not a "no takebacks!&
697.
by yebyen 8y ago
> able to use the proprietary URLs because a commit was made that contained them (the parent of the above), and thus they are open source You're right about one thing, I don't need to agree with your ethical framework, especial
698.
by yebyen 8y ago
That's a technical response to your technical question. The license is there, in the master branch. I don't see any reverted commit, the code is simply licensed as MIT as far as we can tell.
699.
by yebyen 8y ago
Maybe you can show me the actual mistake, because no commit was apparently referenced in either the post I replied to or the parent post.
700.
by yebyen 8y ago
Why assume the commit was made in error? It looks like there has been some discussion and it was done completely on purpose. You cannot compile the binary from arbitrary commits by yourself and release copies of the compiled work as "
701.
by yebyen 8y ago
I've heard of preact! Thanks for reminding me of this
702.
by yebyen 8y ago
I just went looking for a minimal react install and found this: https://github.com/krasimir/react-bare-minimum When I was able to get it working, it came out to 880kb. That's more than (nearly) 600kb! I thought
703.
by yebyen 8y ago
You should experience Railsconf once. For all of DHH's pompousness, he gets taken down a peg every year by Aaron Patterson's closing keynote. This year he raged against the Twitter war that was waged on Foo, Bar and Baz https:&#
704.
by yebyen 8y ago
I've been interested in learning about Stimulus since it was quietly announced, as a way for my team (Rails developers) to keep our JavaScript organized and let it leave a minimal footprint. That being said, I think I've seen this
705.
by yebyen 8y ago
Yeah, to those shrewd investors... the lessors, you could call them! What say we split the profits, 50/50? Doesn't sound fair, huh... well, what number would you consider fair?
706.
by yebyen 8y ago
I'm going to embarrass my friend and plug his leanpub book, Scary Large Code Surgery with Pivots, because it was so similar to your story, except he wasn't new in his career. Step 1 of rewriting a code base that doesn't have
707.
by yebyen 8y ago
You do what you want when you publish software! But if you take the entire class of people that produce derivative works, and count them as "not users" you are making a set error. Derivative works producers are also users. GPL l
708.
by yebyen 8y ago
This is splitting hairs. Of course there is no restriction on use, but in order to produce a derivative work I will want to eat my own dogfood. If my company's legal department says that our product must remain proprietary and closed
709.
by yebyen 8y ago
Absolutely! Not saying that Apple model is right or wrong, but they certainly chose BSD consciously (whether or not it was because of the encumbrance of GPL, or any technical reasons). It's simply wrong to say that nobody pays attentio
710.
by yebyen 8y ago
It seems like the point has been lost. Unless you're building (as your company's product) a Git client based on Git, then the license of Git is irrelevant. It does not enter into the question of how you must license your product
711.
by yebyen 8y ago
You're mistaken. (Well, maybe not mistaken if I read exactly what you said literally, but people/companies most certainly do choose not to use GPL software if they're looking to build a system that they can exploit for profi
712.
by yebyen 8y ago
I disagree with the decision, and I am a Docker user, but I'm not sure I agree with calling them "customers." For the record, I skimmed the discussion too, and I don't understand "astounding level of toxicity"
713.
by yebyen 8y ago
Agree! I am an app developer, and I like to think about how to make app developers jobs (and onboarding) easier, and the next thing I will write on that vein I think, already decided with the idea and design mostly formulated, will be a Ch
714.
by yebyen 8y ago
> deploying code without visibility of the underlying server it runs on Well I take issue with this, I think Kubeless and Riff are definitely serverless, even though I need a Kubernetes cluster provisioned (and it obviously has servers i
715.
by yebyen 8y ago
This is super! I was able to understand how to use it right away, installed and upvoted. I don't know how much I will use it, but I have often noticed the same insightful people popping up in discussions I am interested in, and so I
716.
by yebyen 8y ago
I think you get people who are "all-in" on AWS and there are probably fewer people "all-in" on Google. I agree that developer experience in Lambda is crap, I am a Ruby person though and my language of choice is not on th
717.
by yebyen 8y ago
Sure. Somebody made up their mind what they wanted to do, they were required by law to seek public comments. That 98% of unique comments and an overwhelming majority of public discussion were on one side of the issue, and they were then ov
718.
by yebyen 8y ago
Why else would they have made up this ridiculous story about being hacked? You're much too charitable.
719.
by yebyen 8y ago
Anyone non-technical who was not directly involved with the deed, perhaps. It is not at all honest to say "we were hacked" if the truth is actually "we hacked ourselves." Honestly (and of course, I don't have anyth
720.
by yebyen 8y ago
Yes, this is a whitewashing of that exactly. My father and 3-year old nephew also left this comment! I had no idea he was so advanced for his age.

More ›