Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yebyen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
62 ms
·
571.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
So, maybe a minor victory this was flagged? I don't think that, but it is what it is? (I think the post is great, I've only read 2/3 of it, but pretty on message. Feel like I only just got to the technical part...)
572.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
These (handful of) Urbit threads are the only place I see this happen on HN. People here just hate him. The last time I was in one of these threads, it was "no platform for fascists." Now that he's leaving, I wonder what th
573.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Because the data doesn't cost anything different than when I'm at home. Do you always do that when you're at home too? That's very conscientious of you, I can tell you that my data bill is already under $5-10/mo m
574.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Not trying to be obstinate, but I'm a Rails dev and probably won't do that There is a Draftpack for elixir: https://github.com/technosophos/draft-elixir/tree/master/pac... And here's an Al
575.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
If you have SNMP signals on your DSM, you probably got an alert sooner, something like this if you were actively listening for it: > WARNING - Synology "DS1513+" (s/n: "XXXXTTT99999", "DSM 6.2-23824"),
576.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Azure team open source products can almost all be used without Azure cloud.[1] I do use Azure but not for everything, you can definitely use Draft without Azure, it's Kube-native software so you can use it anywhere you have Kubernetes
577.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> Detail: Reserved > Abstract: A vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a susceptible version of Synology Diskstation Manager (DSM). > Publish Time: 2018-12-26 That's pretty much all of the useful
578.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Is the problem with building containers that you don't have a Dockerfile and you don't want to spend time making one? Draft does that pretty well with Draftpacks, in my experience if there is a Draftpack for what you're using
579.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> I don’t pay a fee on my credit cards, the merchant does While that may be technically correct, it's ignorant of the fact that costs are always passed down the line in any economic relationship like you're describing. That fra
580.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
But... we are in the middle of a government shutdown, aren't we? And the stock market is also going bonkers just this last few days. Those are facts, and today this is another one. That's not cherry picking. That's not co
581.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I think the answer is supposed to be that you've done your architecture wrong if you ever allow a revoke list to grow as high as 10k or beyond. You should not have to grant very many long-lived JWT tokens to begin with, so for most re
582.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> An attacker was able to somehow issue a bunch of tokens for himself I'm not expert in JWT and just jumping in here, but wouldn't that imply total compromise of the PKI if this ever happens? I'm saying, if this scenario c
583.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I think if you consider the audience of this book might actually be 7 years old, it's fair to leave the line in. Something something, "today's lucky 10,000" https://xkcd.com/1053/ The reason for the
584.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> A curated list for awesome kubernetes I've seen this list before and it is super comprehensive. Thanks for linking it; I need more like this for my "extreme breadth of choices" slide, when I present to my coworkers who
585.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
If you want to use your worker nodes as load balancers via Ingress, to do this on the super cheap without provisioning any Load Balancers, then you can also do that. (FWIW, DigitalOcean charges for load balancers too, and you can avoid spe
586.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Hmm! I think this has changed since the beta. Why not try a cluster with a smaller scaling group? You can create a cluster with only one node in it, but what is it that you are trying to do on top of your Kubernetes? In my experience wit
587.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
This is exactly what they want you to conclude. You can have a Kubernetes cluster for about $15/mo for your personal project on GKE, if you can cope with several f1-micro or a single g1-small instance hosting your workloads. That'
588.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I lost it when I got to the Bonus Round... because obviously, a steak is a salad, and soup is a wet salad? I mean how could you not get that...
589.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Yes! Hi Eddie, I'm Kingdon we met at RailsConf :D I've been using Kops with Digital Ocean for some time on-and-off, comparing it to the new managed offering which I've been using in limited release, and it works great (either
590.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
You could use Hephy Workflow (you might have heard of Deis Workflow?) on DOK8S to do that. This is an open-source fork of Deis Workflow. We're hoping to add support for Digital Ocean's Kubernetes and ancillary services like storag
591.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
"How do you eat an elephant? One spoonful at a time..."
592.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
EKS is no more a competitor to K8S than DOK8s is a competitor to K8s. The CNCF Conformance page[1] shows a link to a spreadsheet[2] which indicates there are currently 96 products by 82 different vendors, including 34 hosted platforms like
593.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
You are right, $0.20/hr * 24hr * 30day is $144 This is a huge number compared to the competition, but also a rounding error when it comes to the monthly infrastructure spend expenses of Amazon's target market here. I mean, to be f
594.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Yes, this is the pricing model for everyone except EKS/AWS as I understand it. Manager nodes are bundled with whatever you spend on your worker nodes. Google has gone so far with GKE as to offer HA masters distributed across availabil
595.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
> I haven't had any of those problems in moderately sized on-prem k8s clusters. Just out of curiosity, how are you managing your on-prem k8s clusters? (Is there a toolkit you'd recommend using? Kubespray?)
596.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Not disagreeing with you, and those are all "noob problems" from my perspective as I've done all of those things wrong before myself, and I myself am a noob. But they are some actually very complex problems (and you can even
597.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
I think I've had that experience. I wouldn't generalize and say it's "the current experience," and certainly not 50% of the time, but I can say I have had this experience at least once on every cloud provider that
598.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
You say Polyester leisure suit, I say auditable distributed ledger, let's call the whole thing off... I really am not an advocate of Tether, or Bitcoin anymore at this point to be honest (it's proven to have on-chain scaling issue
599.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
Hah.. bazinga! I've learned a lot since I started writing Ruby at my first permanent job in 2010, and I'm 100% sure that if I looked at any of the early Ruby code I wrote in 2010, I'd grumble and groan at it just as hard as i
600.
▲
by
yebyen
8y ago
OK, I am skeptical of this too, but it's a thing. 10 minutes before the announcement that OP is about here, one of our architects copied this line from an AWS slide deck: > AWS Lambda supports code written in Node.js (JavaScript), P
More ›