yccs27

34 ms·

391.
by yccs27 6y ago
I love seeing how much you can do with monads, and React with its (semi)-functional paradigm seems like a good fit. I wish the readme discussed the “how do i write code with this library“ part more, with a separate explaination of the techn
392.
by yccs27 6y ago
The editor is great and you can export to LaTeX, which is the single most important feature for me. I would gladly have dropped ~30$ on the offline version, but that only pays for a year of subsciption - so that‘s a no from me. I‘m just usi
393.
by yccs27 6y ago
It seems like understanding the exotic monads themselves is not the point. To me, that page mostly shows that monad laws allow some weird Monad instances on the same data structure. The only exotic monad which was intuitive to me was Global
394.
by yccs27 6y ago
Others are pointing out that Fantasy UIs have too much complexity to serve as your average productivity tool interface, and that an artistic design hurts usability. Yet there is a subset of usable interfaces which look a lot like the exampl
395.
by yccs27 6y ago
Indeed, the unbiasedness condition for an estimator says nothing about its quality relative to other estimators. Instead, it requires that you cannot change the target function γ without the expected loss becoming worse. The paper I refer
396.
by yccs27 6y ago
There seems to be a nice duality between Bayesian and Frequentist inference [1]: Assume that both the system state and the observation are drawn from some joint probability distribution. There is some function γ of the system state which we