yazzku

32 ms·

451.
by yazzku 4y ago
Somebody should try this again but with George Carlin.
452.
by yazzku 4y ago
AI's ultimate goal is to bring humour back to the sterilized American society. Seinfield was just an alpha. The ultimately version will be to immortalize George Carlin.
453.
by yazzku 4y ago
You're not a leader just because idiots follow you. Therefore 'followee' is more appropriate.
454.
by yazzku 4y ago
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/06/28/turkey-is-now-...
455.
by yazzku 4y ago
Clickbait title.
456.
by yazzku 4y ago
> Most people asking how to “build a their own engine to build a game” should be discouraged from that. Why? You didn't even ask why they want to build their own engine. If the purpose is to learn their underpinnings, then they shou
457.
by yazzku 4y ago
It was half the radius of a football field.
458.
by yazzku 4y ago
That's what they want you to believe.
459.
by yazzku 4y ago
> or find bugs in the Linux kernel and solve them Then we won't hear how somebody rewrote pong in Rust on HN. I worry too.
460.
by yazzku 4y ago
Abso-fucking-lutely.
461.
by yazzku 4y ago
Don't miss Sussman's talk linked from the post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgRFOjVzvm0 This stuff resonates with me deeply. The reality of the modern computing world is a clusterfuck that no single person und
462.
by yazzku 4y ago
Ok, yeah, maybe I'll take my latter statement back. Ideally things are developed at the pace you describe and under the scrutiny of society. There are people thinking this through -- EDRI and a bunch of other organizations -- just prob
463.
by yazzku 4y ago
Does this mean that contributions of data, labelling, etc. remain open? I'm hesitant to spend a single second on these things unless they are truly open.
464.
by yazzku 4y ago
What's the tl;dr on the Apache license? Is there any guarantee that our data and labelling contributions will remain open?
465.
by yazzku 4y ago
> and then say... hey, not my problem, I was just following my pure ideology bro. That's basically the definition of Google and Facebook, which go about their business taking no responsibility for the damage they cause. As for Micro
466.
by yazzku 4y ago
Microsoft is not "reasonable people". Having this behind closed corporate walls is the worst possible outcome. The nuclear example isn't really a counter-argument. If only one nation had access to them, every other nation wou
467.
by yazzku 4y ago
Why isn't Google fined for distributing malware?
468.
by yazzku 4y ago
I am watching the Carbon talk now. Successful language transitions have happened in the past when the new language is fully and easily interoperable with the old one. How easy is it to add Rust to a C++ code base? If the answer is 'not
469.
by yazzku 4y ago
Wow, hold up. > Nobody really likes C++ or CMake, and there's no clear path for getting off old toolchains. Every year the pain will get worse. I do like C++ and CMake. Get off 'old' toolchains? Why is 'old' here
470.
by yazzku 4y ago
Rust evangelists surely need to crank it more. Make sure to wrap it in unsafe{}, boys.
471.
by yazzku 4y ago
Yeah, and I said the above being myself a big fan of C. I write C in my hobby projects. Yet if I were doing anything non-trivial that talks over the network, that protocol parsing would for sure not be hand-written.
472.
by yazzku 4y ago
It's simple enough, and yet: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32675 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-41099 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail&#x
473.
by yazzku 4y ago
At a cursory glance, they assert((size_t)rv <= n), but if that's the assert.h assert(), it's just void when NDEBUG is defined, and cmake seems to define that when building a Release target. Also, gcc does not seem to define it
474.
by yazzku 4y ago
A good read for sure, thank you. '4. Protocol Parsing', hand-writing protocol parsers in C looks particularly thrilling.
475.
by yazzku 4y ago
I think the point is that if the nearby group of parents all agree on it, the kids don't feel as much social pressure to be on the platform.
476.
by yazzku 4y ago
> You've been visited by St. Ignucious. Upvote for success in FOSS St. Ignucious would not use the term 'FOSS': https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/floss-and-foss.en.html
477.
by yazzku 4y ago
It's not even open.
478.
by yazzku 4y ago
Can you see it with three eyes opened?
479.
by yazzku 4y ago
Sounds like your perception can't exactly be pigeonholed . Boom, baby.
480.
by yazzku 4y ago
Yellow doesn't do it for me. But orange, oh boy.

More ›