yanw

10 ms·

61.
by yanw 14y ago
https://drive.google.com/keep/ It's under the Drive umbrella.
62.
by yanw 14y ago
This is ridiculous. How hard is it to import an OPML file into any of the other feed services that already exist on the web, or those popping up everyday. Do we really need to keep regurgitating this story?! it's been dominating the front p
63.
by yanw 14y ago
Problem solved then. Other feed readers exist, so what's your point?!
64.
by yanw 14y ago
Then they'll build one now.
65.
by yanw 14y ago
Keep is a feature, Drive is the App (apple/oranges).
66.
by yanw 14y ago
It has less to do with my superior intellect and more with the fact that every wannabe reader has an import from Reader button, which is made possible by Google allowing data portability. You could buy more Drive storage to put your mind at
67.
by yanw 14y ago
Yay, more indignant Reader protest in the form of casual comments about a different Google launch, how refreshing! As you noted Drive is actually acknowledged to be under someone's management (Apps) and not an afterthought kept on life sup
68.
by yanw 14y ago
Any change to this API in a couple of years will be the introduction of v2. Drive is now a pillar of Google's services, not just Apps but Google Now and search rely on data stored in it, and with many competing storage services around any d
69.
by yanw 14y ago
Nothing lasts forever and I obviously can't guarantee you anything on Google's behalf, but the difference here being APIs and products launched before Larry Page became CEO and those launching after.
70.
by yanw 14y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5403668
71.
by yanw 14y ago
No, they added 3,4,5 features to existing products, and it's fairly obvious that I'm not sure if you're trolling or not.
72.
by yanw 14y ago
Reader didn't have a documented API, and the differences between it and this only begin there. Move on.
73.
by yanw 14y ago
They patched the Exynos bug: http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/16/3883238/samsung-exynos-sec...
74.
by yanw 14y ago
Did a summary instead of replaying to multiple comments.
75.
Test
1 points by yanw 14y ago|0 comments
76.
by yanw 14y ago
The thing about blogspam is that it often generates confusion. The author took some liberties with his conclusions which explains some of the comments below. Here is a more informed post: http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/03/13/breaking-go
77.
by yanw 14y ago
Chrome for Android doesn't do extensions.
78.
by yanw 14y ago
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=40506
79.
by yanw 14y ago
This: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=40506
80.
by yanw 14y ago
I don't think so, there in an equivalent to it on other browser unlike the mobile version. And on mobile there is developer revenue to consider. Also the way Adblock in implemented on mobile does introduce security risks: http://www.androi
81.
by yanw 14y ago
I think you're confused. Adblock for Android was pulled due to an agreement violation: http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/03/13/breaking-google-has-... Adblock for Chrome is still in the Webstore.
82.
by yanw 14y ago
They're not quite similar as there isn't an ad blocking equivalent on other mobile platforms, but it exists on other browsers. Also in this case there is the app developer revenue to consider. Anyway you can still side-load on both platform
83.
by yanw 14y ago
Blogspam. I'm fed up with this blog, they somehow manage to hijack every news item even though their posts read like something a drunk child wrote. Source: former PM speculating on Quora: https://www.quora.com/Google-Reader-Shut-Down-Mar
84.
by yanw 14y ago
https://www.google.com/experimental/gmailfieldtrial What you're suggesting is probably phase 2.
85.
Google patches Chrome's Pwn2own exploit(googlechromereleases.blogspot.com)
1 points by yanw 14y ago|0 comments
86.
An update on our war against account hijackers(googleblog.blogspot.com)
1 points by yanw 14y ago|0 comments
87.
President Obama Admits That Patent Trolls Just Try To 'Extort' Money(techdirt.com)
1 points by yanw 14y ago|0 comments
88.
by yanw 14y ago
It's as it should be: http://marketingland.com/why-im-glad-google-play-gives-devel...
89.
by yanw 14y ago
No.
90.
by yanw 14y ago
No it's not a "flaw": http://marketingland.com/why-im-glad-google-play-gives-devel... http://marketingland.com/google-play-gives-email-addresses-p... It's ridicules how some outlets just run with this sort of crap without question.

More ›