Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yakubin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
541.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
If you refer to that date, then UTC. But you may just as well say that it's the number of seconds since 1969-12-31 7:00 pm EST. There is nothing special about UTC wrt Unix timestamps.
542.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
POSIX time isn’t “in UTC” regardless of that. UTC is just one of many timezones you can use when specifying which point in time timestamp 0 refers to. You could just as well use EST or anything else.
543.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
I like reading this site, because it has a few good commenters, and it’s focused on tech and programming, whereas the front page of HN sometimes looks completely dominated by politics and culture topics. It isn’t perfect, but it’s quite goo
544.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
It doesn't. Equivalent definition of Unix timestamps would be "seconds since 1969-12-31 7:00 pm EST". It doesn't mean Unix timestamps have an implicit timezone of EST.
545.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
In this case we're talking about Unix timestamps though, which count the number of seconds since 1970 UTC. Adding a timezone to it is nonsensical. The number is always the same, no matter which timezone you're in. It's in the
546.
▲
libgrapheme 2.0.0 – freestanding C99 Unicode 15.0.0 string library
(libs.suckless.org)
3 points
by
yakubin
4y ago
|
2 comments
547.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
I’m from Poland and smoking in public here is everywhere. I go through the ritual of holding my breath countless times a day when I pass smokers, ever since I was a child. My visits to the UK agree with your picture of it. Fortunately I’m m
548.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
> And if the python community has to suffer from the actions needed to support said customers, fuck em right? Nobody is asking the python community to do anything. Canonical isn't sending stalkers after their members. They're
549.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Canonical exists to support Ubuntu customers/community, not Python community.
550.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
This looks like Ada.
551.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Yes? I wouldn’t even think that’s in any way controversial.
552.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
I wouldn't trust a corporation of this size to make sure there aren't recurring bugs which cause scanning of things I have on my device, but do not upload to their servers. If the code for scanning, flagging me and reporting to au
553.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
30 votes in an hour is a lot and easily gets you on the front page.
554.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
A lot of times code compiled with no optimisations (-O0) is unusable. Specifically, in video some software compiled without optimisations won't push frames on time and instead will just keep dropping frames. There was a post a couple d
555.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Switzerland is generally looked upon as the closest a country can get to democratic these days and, from what I understand, more contentious topics there are resolved by referendums. That's something I'd agree with. Generally poli
556.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Current compiler optimisations are written with current hardware in mind, while I doubt that older optimisations would become pessimisations on newer hardware, so I'd compare the performance of the best C compiler from 2004 against the
557.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
That Proebsting's law link is of course dead, and redirects to the main page of Microsoft Research. In my experience, it's the natural state of links to Microsoft Research pages. What's up with that?
558.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
> I would argue that voting is neither necessary nor appropriate for this problem It's a change to the Debian Social Contract. Making it without voting would be like changing a country's constitution without voting. How else
559.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
> So this is only for the installer, right? According to the Debian wiki description of this option[1]: "Where non-free firmware is found to be necessary, the target system will also be configured to use the non-free-firmware comp
560.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Debian uses a Condorcet method[1] for voting, which may be a bit more complicated than traditional simple majority voting, but makes sure that the winner would also win in every pair-wise election, as opposed to a less desirable candidate w
561.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Debian Social Contract: < https://www.debian.org/social_contract >
562.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Is KeePassXC a registered trademark? I haven't found any confirmation of it on KeePassXC's website, nor on Wikipedia, so I guess the answer is no. A shame really. Trademarks would be so useful in such situations, which seem to rec
563.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
I don't like it. The spacing is such that the page seems to be awkwardly hanging in mid-air. There is less information visible without scrolling. The top bar looks as if it was borrowed from Facebook. I would be disappointed if this de
564.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
I used to use Synaptic around 2010. It was great. I've never come to like things like GNOME Software Center though. They were buggy and gimped, when I tried them. Also the UI was awful (and still is from what I saw from the screenshots
565.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
When I invoke "apt search", the first thing I'm going to see is the last thing printed. The first thing is lost to scrollback history.
566.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
What do bot-prevention mechanisms like that mean for crawlers, such as Google bot, or apps such as Discord trying to get titles of pages linked in chats? Are websites enabling such functionality less searchable? In my experience Vultr websi
567.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
The question I prefer to ask is “how much functionality can I comprehend in a given amount of time” rather than “how many lines of code can I comprehend in a given amount of time”.
568.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
Yup. My eyes started getting tired exactly at the point when the text became gray.
569.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
GCC has gotten better indeed, but it's still in a different league than Clang. I still get into situations where I can't make heads-or-tails of what GCC is saying to me, which can usually be easily solved by switching to Clang.
570.
▲
by
yakubin
4y ago
I think the main differentiators for clang were more readable error messages than the mess GCC had (and still has), and faster compilation (here it lost a bit of its advantage over time). I haven't heard of anyone praising it over GCC
More ›