y0ghur7_xxx

12 ms·

61.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> the market share of people with your problem is small I don't have stats or data, but I don't think the households with devices that have web interfaces like a nas, routers, media centers, and stuff like this are small.
62.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> What’s to deal with? It’s still the same as before: not secure. But there is no meaningful way to make it secure. So marking it not secure creates just noise.
63.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> Parent comment was talking about routers and network printers. No CA (except for if you're your own CA) would provision a certificate for "192.168.0.1" or "hp-laserjet". hp could get a cert for 15327c5ba80d1b89
64.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> Your devices can get letsencrypt certs I don't want all my internal network hosts exposed on a certificate transparency log. I want my http connections to work without scary warnings in my local home network. Because if you show m
65.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> I enforce high-quality release notes like you describe. Representative example: https://github.com/sapcc/swift-http-import/blob/master/CHANG... . (note that this also takes SemVer seriously) Nitpick:
66.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
I don't understand why so many people are in love with the Model M. I used one for nearly 3 years before switching to a Cherry MX blue keyboard. After using a modern mechanical keyboard, I would never switch back to a Model M. Probably
67.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> If there is a commonly used open source library without hackable bugs, you won't even hear about the author who committed his/her own time to build reliable software. Come on, that's not true. There was a sectest made on
68.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
This filter removes most of the cookie dialogs: https://github.com/r4vi/block-the-eu-cookie-shit-list
69.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> What do you do if your cellular provider goes IPv6-only, but your home ISP will only give you a v4 address? Get a tunnel from he[1] and access the home network through that. [1] https://tunnelbroker.net/
70.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
Seems like slowly the web is becoming secure like TOR.
71.
FCA Autonomous Driving 5 Year Plan [pdf](autonews.com)
2 points by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago|0 comments
72.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> the major one is a vastly smaller BGP routing table, which is becoming more and more of an issue. But that's not a problem for me. It's a problem for my isp. And if he does not care, why should I?
73.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
I deployed a dual ipv4 + ipv6 stack on my home lan a few years ago. I got myself a /48 from hurricane electric, and did everything like it's in the book: SLAAC for subnets, fixed addresses on servers, every device had a public ipv
74.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
I interacted a bit with the OWASP community a few years ago, and it seemed to me the O on OWASP is not really there. It feels like the community is made of a few guys, the typical stereotype pentester: a bit arrogant, and difficult to commu
75.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> A company who it didn't affect much, spent 100s of our hours? I think it would reasonable to call that onerous. 100 hours is 12.5 days. That is not much to protect your users data.
76.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> You can pay with your data if you consent to it. No I can not. I can pay with money. User data is not money.
77.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> Why is it a problem that you have to agree to be monetized to read a stupid blog post? Do you want my opinion or what the gdpr says? My opinion is that my data is not a commodity exchange. We (I) usually use money for that. The gdpr sa
78.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
> They can't, but they can, for example, ask for a fee to read the article. They don't deny you reading it, but they don't have to give it to you for free either. Of course they can charge a fee. They should. > Either y
79.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
"To make Medium work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use Medium, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy." No Medium, I must NOT agree to your privacy policy and your cookie policy, because
80.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
Why don't you just zoom in? This seems so obvious to me that I am sure I am missing something. I set the hn zoom level to 120%, and firefox remembers my zoom setting for the site so I don't have to set it every time.
81.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
I was looking for a desktop app that could show and handle git lfs file locks in a graphical gui for me and my coworkers, but found nothing. So I made one. Maybe someone else finds this useful.
82.
Gitlit: handle Git lfs file locks with ease(github.com)
2 points by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago|1 comments
83.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
because if you want slaac to work without nat, the smalles ipv6 subnet you can have is a /64. so if your provider gives you just a single static /64, all you can allocate is a single subnet.
84.
by y0ghur7_xxx 8y ago
I made a frontend for nntp. Even if usenet is long dead. I was following a group (it.comp.console) at the time using thunderbird but I didn't like google groups so I wrote my own nntp web frontent to follow the group on my smartphone.
85.
Show HN: I made an nntp web front end(fcku.it)
3 points by y0ghur7_xxx 9y ago|0 comments
86.
by y0ghur7_xxx 9y ago
We still have some legacy PowerBuilder apps running today, and I am responsible for one. I still have to change some things in the app from time to time. PowerBuilder is (was) an extremely powerful rad tool. The datawindow still has no riva
87.
by y0ghur7_xxx 9y ago
> But don't go too far and substitute authentication for network isolation. Vulnerabilities are a thing. I don't know if I still agree with this. One of my most important and private services is exposed on the web - the most un
88.
Friends in Different Phases(medium.com)
1 points by y0ghur7_xxx 9y ago|0 comments
89.
by y0ghur7_xxx 9y ago
usenet
90.
by y0ghur7_xxx 9y ago
It was discontinued and died.

More ›