xwolfi

7 ms·

61.
by xwolfi 1y ago
higher IQ people <-- well you have to prove that first, so let me ask you a test question to prove them: how can you mix collaboration and competition in society to produce the optimal productivity/conflict ratio ?
62.
by xwolfi 1y ago
The censorship here in China is only about public discussions / spaces. You cannot like have a website telling you about the crimes of the party. But downloading some compressed matrix re-spouting the said crimes, nobody gives a damn.
63.
by xwolfi 1y ago
welcome to 3DTV hype, LLM are useless...
64.
by xwolfi 1y ago
An interface is a layer of translation between two things. In Object oriented programming, it's a contract between two encapsulated modules: you define how one should be used, without exposing internals, and the other will have only th
65.
by xwolfi 1y ago
America went from a land populated by people so weak they were decimated by foreign soldiers on horses, to the strongest army in the world. It evolved, positively ?
66.
by xwolfi 1y ago
And in one thought, I found that LLM can't yet pass that imaginary experiment, yes. So I would argue what we already know: LLM are not thinking lol. I can distinguish them, they're not gonna trick me, or play with me.
67.
by xwolfi 1y ago
That seems a little bit dangerous, why not do it in a language you know ? Plus, this is not launching rockets on the moon, it's a sentence splitter with a fancy state machine (probably very useful in your niche, not a critique) - the d
68.
by xwolfi 1y ago
We have infinite uranium anyway !
69.
by xwolfi 1y ago
What are humans, fundamentally, then ?
70.
by xwolfi 1y ago
"Are you an LLM?" poof, fails the Turing test. Even if they lie, you could ask them 20 times and they d reply the lie, without feeling annoyed: FAIL. LLMs cannot pass the Turing test, it's easy to see they're not human.
71.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Zoom out: 200 years ago they were killing each other over slavery, 400 years ago, there was no american society. The trend is up, but they're in a local minimum :D
72.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Imagine in that future world you describe, how immensely valuable a human artist will be: originality, wit, brilliance, their design will completely conquer any competitor generating the slop you dream of.
73.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Yeah, we all own all code, if we can't understand the code we own, we study it. If we need to change it, we change it. "Legacy" for me is a bad word. I refuse to use it, and I scold my colleagues when they do: it's our c
74.
by xwolfi 1y ago
imbecile, stop repeating this scam...
75.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Sir, this is a Wendy
76.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Well yeah you have to look at the entire training duration for your brain. It did take a while to be as perfect as you seem to be, several billion years, and I'm sure you make mistakes sometimes and hallucinate stupid ideas. And don&#x
77.
by xwolfi 1y ago
What are you saying, I'm in China it's completely false. There is very lax enforcement, and if there is enforcement, there's always an opportunity to bribe. The communist party doesn't have "access" to a billio
78.
by xwolfi 1y ago
I like that one
79.
by xwolfi 1y ago
It is normal, you add a layer between the two brains that communicate, and that layer only add statistical experience to the message. I write letters to my gf, in English, while English is not our first language. I would never ever put an L
80.
by xwolfi 1y ago
You know reality is independent from your morals right ?
81.
by xwolfi 1y ago
I'm in a new budding relationship and we're exchanging letters. There is no way in Earth I touch chatgpt, but if I write well, how believable is it ? Is she ? I hate this thing, it's so soul-less.
82.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Because when they break things they lose hours of work they cannot afford to lose. My parents had a small business and if my mom mis-clicked somewhere and deleted some important thing, she would enter a panicked rage as she'd lose half
83.
by xwolfi 1y ago
But everyone experienced in such a "migration" would challenge your flawed impression that there would be cost saving. SAS is in fact used in many serious companies (I know it's used at the fraud department of Bouygues Teleco
84.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Well but what you say is complete nonsense.
85.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Not "only" come on, I'm a little bit younger and I know it too ahah You even linked a youtube video, which I assume is the sketch in question (at work, no youtube): we can look at things from the past and learn them too !
86.
by xwolfi 1y ago
They're not very smart then: most non-native people know there are several big mainstream ways to spell English, and we learn that on top of our own languages. Couldn't American schools teach English the same way, like, that there
87.
by xwolfi 1y ago
I learned that both exist in school in France. It doesn't matter, I write both interchangeably and nobody ever cared nor corrected me.
88.
by xwolfi 1y ago
Quelle que soit la facon dont ils ecrivent, ce sera toujours une faute d'orthographe, puisque la seule vraie facon d'ecrire serait couleur. L'anglais, americain ou britannique, n'est qu'une geante faute d'ortho
89.
by xwolfi 1y ago
We learn both, tbh... And then get confused all our life, it's not like we choose one style in school, school teaches us that English actually has two dominant spellings and here is the American, here is the British and deal with it. N
90.
by xwolfi 1y ago
This feels wrong, I work in China in a European multinational with low number of Americans, yet we all spell in a mixture with no expectation of consistency: half the sentence can be in British, the rest in American and it will be an Austra

More ›