xracy

9 ms·

91.
by xracy 1y ago
What was the opportunity in that segment? Surely airing things the POTUS said is not a limitation of Freedom of the Press? The thing about the FCC threatening Kimmel for this speech, is that someone needs to identify what was problematic ab
92.
by xracy 1y ago
There would certainly be more incentive to be seen as rehabilitating, rather than just 'tough on crime'. Since 'False Positives' in the legal system could come back to bite you as a representative.
93.
by xracy 1y ago
I feel like this is more of just "seattleites respect people's autonomy." I think a lot of places can be really invasive to outsiders of "what are you doing here?" and I htink Seattle is just more "mind your ow
94.
by xracy 1y ago
They're gonna have to make these sooooo cheap if they're hoping to sell any quantity of these. Like $100 fridge with nice amenities cheap... And even then it's hard for me to imagine this making the cut.
95.
by xracy 1y ago
I feel like scotus dissents in this day and age need to be a lot more approachable for the average person. And I like this dissent for being short and to the point. I think oftentimes the dissents can get in the weeds of legal discussions,
96.
by xracy 1y ago
Yeah... I said that? Idk what country you're in, but I definitely said that immediately before the thing you're quoting from me
97.
by xracy 1y ago
Stop being shocked, and start pushing back. Everyone is looking around for someone else to acknowledge that something is up (like a baby that just hit its head), and everyone needs to start crying. People in the US do not have due process r
98.
by xracy 1y ago
you're quoting a lot of legal code for someone starting all of their posts with "IANAL" The point of commenting IANAL, is that legal code is complicated. The ACLU is likely giving "best-practices", but that's n
99.
by xracy 1y ago
I just said the word "domain expert" in my head 5x, and I don't like it any better. Both of them give off "influencer" vibes. They're meaningless without more context. We used to just call people "experts&
100.
by xracy 1y ago
Never quite realized how much I disliked the term "Thought Leader" until I read it 5x in the comments responses of this thread.
101.
by xracy 1y ago
> This was announced what, a year ago? Source? Others are calling out this as being incorrect, so a source would help people evaluate this claim. Personally I'm much more likely to believe that AI companies are moving the goalposts
102.
by xracy 1y ago
Which constitution is their oath to?
103.
by xracy 1y ago
He must also be trying to suspend Habeas Corpus and the Emoluments for personal gain! We can likely agree that some of this is an accident, but what we won't agree on is how much given that some of the removal is distinctly useful for
104.
by xracy 1y ago
Sorry, how is a 3% difference "no gap"? Am I misunderstanding those metrics? If a Democrat is 3% more likely to hold a passport, that seems like a potentially huge impact to elections.
105.
by xracy 1y ago
> There are times when "separate is inherently unequal" is actually the most fair. I guess ask the WNBA if they feel that way about it...
106.
by xracy 1y ago
> There are still places for pretty much everyone who wants to play if they look hard enough, even if not everyone is able to be a part of any team or division that they'd like to. This reads to me as "separate but equal"
107.
by xracy 1y ago
This is just so far from the correct question that it's not worth trying to have a conversation about this. Policing doesn't make crime go away. More cops does not result in less crime. You fix crime by addressing what caused peop
108.
by xracy 1y ago
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable." Show me what legal recourse people have to get their needs met, and I will show you how those avenues are being clamped down on by the very same
109.
by xracy 1y ago
certainly feels like we're just trying to slowly turn up the temperature until everything is still okay. There are plenty examples of things done by gov't officials today that would've ben disqualifying 20 years ago. And I&#x
110.
by xracy 1y ago
I think the difference between what you're complaining about the person saying, and what the person is actually saying could be solved by workers getting paid like $5/hour more (AKA a living wage). The person didn't say anyth
111.
by xracy 1y ago
While I agree the word could be appropriate, I'm asking a meta question about how it is typically used, and whether or not we're conveying something unintentional by using it in this context as well. I don't consider "
112.
by xracy 1y ago
Yeah, was intended as a joke, pretty sure he's "whatever he wants to be", but I remember reading something that he said he only ate like "whole food plant based" which I consider to be "vegan for people who are
113.
by xracy 1y ago
Can I ask why this article is title like Deepseek is a virus? Feels like this could've been "new flu variant". I don't know if this is intentional or not.
114.
by xracy 1y ago
I guess what does he care... he's vegan, right?
115.
by xracy 1y ago
This is needlessly combative. They were asking a different person this question... But a better question might be. "Why is apnews an unreliable source for this information." General distrust of a news outlet doesn't mean that
116.
by xracy 1y ago
> It had nothing to do with safety since there was no provision for remote workers. Citation needed for all of these claims. Please show me this information in the executive order. > Keep in mind this was very early on before they had
117.
by xracy 1y ago
But how will they continue their claim that there are millions of them, if they take such an approach?
118.
by xracy 1y ago
China has better trade relationships with more of the rest of the world than the US does, (especially thanks to recent policy changes by the US Gov't). The only requirement to be the worlds reserve currency is that everyone has to keep
119.
by xracy 1y ago
Sorry, how is recycling not the scam if they were actually just pretending to recycle and not doing it? At scale if every (or even 90% of them) solar company were pretending to get solar energy, I would absolutely consider it a scam Also,
120.
by xracy 1y ago
WHy is your initial answer 'no' when the backend of the answer is functionally "But they got away with the recycling scam." Seems like your initial answer would actually be 'yes?' Specifically because the &quot

More ›