xorxornop

15 ms·

121.
by xorxornop 10y ago
Except that you can't build anything for OSX when you don't have a Mac. That's a totally artificial constraint. Not lock in, you say? Hell,_Microsoft_ is more open than this... the crowd favourite lock-in bogeyman no less...
122.
by xorxornop 10y ago
AFAIK, they only sold un-enriched uranium. If so, you may not be aware, but enriching uranium is NOT a trivial process. If you can enrich uranium then you can build an ICBM - it takes a lot of good engineering talent and very expensive equ
123.
by xorxornop 10y ago
Yeah, that seems nearly a constant for them. For example, in ReSharper (and presumably Project Rider), despite C# having the excellent , very fast (and, critically, fully open source!) compiler-as-a-service, Roslyn, they continue to use th
124.
by xorxornop 10y ago
And I, too! After discovering Autofac, I've not looked back. Before, I'd tried various DI frameworks, and always left thinking "I totally do not get what why people like this DI stuff". Then, Autofac. Everything just wor
125.
by xorxornop 10y ago
Technically, no, but the proliferation of those in the likes of the npm ecosystem is almost entirely due to the shittiness of the JS standard library (such as it is...) . NET, however, has an excellent stdlib, so in practice you simply do n
126.
by xorxornop 10y ago
Also, there is selection bias at work here: we don't hear about all the stuff that the Microsoft fuzzing team does find. And I bet it's a lot. There's no real benefit to them to share their internal findings - it would effect