xorbax

6 ms·

31.
by xorbax 1y ago
Without knowing any specifics, I wonder if this is a thing where the small-scale almost works, and they assume the larger scale will iron out inefficiencies. Is anyone better versed in this? It seems strangely opaque for such a large-scal
32.
by xorbax 1y ago
Shame he doesn't know enough to formulate a theory that this data could be compared to. Maybe people will give him enough money to rent a scientist who can do the actual work for making it a coherent hypothesis that JWST data can be co
33.
by xorbax 1y ago
It was a blog post, not science.
34.
by xorbax 1y ago
That's the amusing part. It's interesting it got as much interaction as it did
35.
by xorbax 1y ago
Lame that you can't obviously choose to show the last two weeks of the total.
36.
by xorbax 1y ago
There will now be a CEO (Chief Executive Orderer) who will statistically balance fastfood orders during times requiring late nights to maintain normal public-facing order activity. Or their boss will tell them to order "anything but a
37.
by xorbax 1y ago
But are you accomplishing the same amount and being equally effective, or just accomplishing less over the same amount of time?
38.
by xorbax 1y ago
If it's allowed to continue, which seems very shakey at the moment. NASA's would from DOGE will result in projects - even mostly completed one - being trashed.
39.
by xorbax 1y ago
Because it appears to be a massive data breach involving unqualified and unvetted random citizens. It was useless in terms of its own states goals, was randomly abandoned, and likely did damage that will take years to fully comprehend. Usin
40.
by xorbax 1y ago
People who have kids know it will be on streaming and can't afford the theatre. Figure it out. This isn't nostalgia IP, it's for actual children. Like who live in families with budgets and priorities. Catch me when the stream
41.
by xorbax 1y ago
How does "Blowtorch" handle things like the gravitational lensing difference between baryon-only and the fact that dark matter is able to account for it [1]? I know the theory doesn't do anything mathematically, but I'm
42.
by xorbax 1y ago
Wasn't there also a text-to-speech voiceover of the local forecast text? I would have sworn they would replace the music with a guy "reading" the forecast.
43.
by xorbax 1y ago
Actually a LOL line. A long with his very skilled and meaningful schematic.
44.
by xorbax 1y ago
Is this where we are intellectually? Complaining about too much proof and rigor ? Just run it through chatGPT or something and ask it to read it for you
45.
by xorbax 1y ago
> My favorite example is an X11 windows manager implementing in about 18 lines of python. Uh, do you happen to know where to find that project? Sounds pretty comprehensible for most people as an example.
46.
by xorbax 1y ago
I mean, we just have integrated pocket-watches.
47.
by xorbax 1y ago
Are there clocks in your casino so people can note how long they've been playing?
48.
by xorbax 2y ago
But there's not reason to think anything was cut
49.
by xorbax 2y ago
You could define it as "the degradation of cellular maintenance". Androgenic hair loss is more like a non universal signal of hormonal maturity, like pubic hair growth.
50.
by xorbax 2y ago
Also, recreation is technology. If it turns out that ten mammoths are more efficient and require less human maintenance to modulate tundra and encourage the ecocycle, we know how to do it. We don't need to start a 50 year investment in
51.
by xorbax 2y ago
That seems more like a fun sci-fi speculation
52.
by xorbax 2y ago
Because photons behave in a fundamentally different way than sound. See the Michelson-Morley experiment.
53.
by xorbax 2y ago
I mean, yeah there's tons of theoretical work. Predictions about lensing and structure have been done and verified. We've taken pictures of black holes. Susskind did a big fancy simulation for Interstellar that lined up great wi
54.
by xorbax 2y ago
Perhaps if someone who gets the language did it for today's date, we'd both get some clarity. I've tried working backwards but the labyrinthine explanation doesn't project
55.
by xorbax 2y ago
This might be the first time I get a joke's punchline but not the setup
56.
by xorbax 2y ago
This is why I think Akira can't be surpassed. Not just because it was done on acetate, but because of the level of skill and consideration required to animate that way. You can't just undo that brush stroke onto the cel and try so
57.
by xorbax 2y ago
Except you don't know what your vision would be if you didn't have correction, so I'm not sure how that actually says anything
58.
by xorbax 2y ago
I think it's great. For both, problem is extremes of apathy to actual consideration of the effects in society and lack of rational regulations. The important part should be understanding the whys and building access to a robust nonpuni
59.
by xorbax 2y ago
Just like crack and fentanyl! Let the market decide, cowards. Although it is fun that it's totally fine for an American company to take the reins and continue on. This could have been done with emphasis on the way China engineers Tik
60.
by xorbax 2y ago
You tell us. You're working with the same internet as the rest of us.

More ›