xinbenlv

5 ms·

31.
Show HN: launched Namefi new domain search experience for collectors(search.labs.namefi.io)
2 points by xinbenlv 10mo ago|0 comments
32.
Ask HN: Why no one supports multi-signer auth?(twitter.com)
1 points by xinbenlv 11mo ago|1 comments
33.
by xinbenlv 11mo ago
Wise @X friends: why have major authentication providers like @auth0 and @ClerkDev and @Google / @LinkedIn SSO have not supported "Multi-Signer Authentication": instead of a single signer, simply ask for more signers to auth
34.
by xinbenlv 1y ago
Let us know if you hate the idea too
35.
Show HN: Namefi tokenize domain for trading, DeFi and future internet(namefi.io)
1 points by xinbenlv 1y ago|1 comments
36.
Show HN: Visualize Wikipedia link graph, opensourced(galaxy.wikiloop.org)
3 points by xinbenlv 1y ago|0 comments
37.
Why Tokenize Domains?(namefi.io)
1 points by xinbenlv 1y ago|1 comments
38.
by xinbenlv 1y ago
So people ask us a lot why we bother to Tokenize domains and what's the value. We finally took a time to write it down
39.
by xinbenlv 1y ago
Thank you for your response. Without this MCP, I couldn't directly install MCP servers without having to find the right command / url and add them to the mcp.json. If you know which MCP server already supports this feature, I woul
40.
Show HN: I made a tool to chat-install other MCPs because I was lazy(mcpsq.xyz)
1 points by xinbenlv 1y ago|3 comments
41.
Show HN: MCP² (Mcpsq) – A MCP Server to Discover and Install Other MCP Servers(mcpsq.xyz)
1 points by xinbenlv 1y ago|0 comments
42.
by xinbenlv 1y ago
Congrats Erik. We are launching something that support x402 soon. DM'ed you on LinkedIn
43.
Show HN: OpenHands' GitHub Action(github.com)
2 points by xinbenlv 1y ago|0 comments
44.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
Here are a few links for folks to poke around: Our source code made public on Github: https://github.com/d3servelabs/d3caf Ethereum mainnet deployment address (Implementation V1) https://etherscan.io/ad
45.
Show HN: D3Caf, a “Contract Address Foundry” Service on Ethereum by D3Serve Labs(hackmd.io)
3 points by xinbenlv 3y ago|1 comments
46.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
Looks pretty nice. What tech stack behind it if you mind sharing?
47.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
## Final words (first batch of answers) Thank you all for your passionate conversations. Your criticize and defending are all super valuable and inspiring to us. Thank NoZebra120vClip@, bawolff@, spaceman_2020@, justsomeadvice0@, duskwuff@,
48.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> oskarw85@: That's simply not true. Even if the underlying mechanism is the public-private key pair most owners do not use it with signing in mind. OP: Society with and without "phones" are foundamentally different. The i
49.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> Considering most Wikipedia editors are under-employed guitarists and retired house painters deciding on the veracity of details about local history events and obscure scientific niches, this doesn't help much. OP: that's true
50.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> FreeTrade@: I'm interested to see an integration of wikis and web-of-trust. This looks to be a step in the right direction. OP: yes, thank you! That's what we see in common!
51.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> @crote: Heck, I'm having trouble seeing what makes this better than a Facebook Like! Yes it's pretty much the same as Facebook Like, except that the accounts are decentralized so could never be banned. Also you could have a g
52.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> @mvid: I work in crypto, and even I ask, what makes this better than GPG? OP: two points. 1. It helps harness the help from EVM wallet's adoption. Most people don't know how to use GPG. Most GPG tools aren't built with m
53.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> @8organicbits: Can I create 1000 empty wallets and endorse bogus edits 1000 times? It's really easy to create empty wallets at scale. What value does an endorsement like that have? In a centralized setup, e.g. facebook and twitter
54.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> justsomeadvice0@: But why in the world would you want to use the same key that can instantaneously shred the dollars in your bank account to ensure authorship of some edit on a website article?... It is a neat hack, that would fare tra
55.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> bawolff@: Anyone can make a mock up, doesnt mean wikidata is going to use it. OP: that's true. We are trying to get a small percentage of early adoptor who would love to opt-in this user script.
56.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> spaceman_2020@: The fundamental flaw at the heart of crypto: the insistence that only onchain data matters, while in the real world, your reputation is tied to your real identity. OP: I think I share the view with sowbug@ in his answer
57.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> bawolff@: So assuming the context is to prove if wikipedia is "censoring" you, i dont get how this would work. OP: The main goal is not to avoid Wikipedia censoring.
58.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> bawolff@: Of course you could have a trusted third party verify the edits, but in that case you might as well just use a normal website. OP: In that version of future, we no longer need a trusted third-party to verify the edits.
59.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> bawolff@: You could definitely do better than what they were doing, but i dont see how you would be able to distinguish between a signature on a real edit and one on a fake edit that never existed on wiki. OP: In our prototype, an endo
60.
by xinbenlv 3y ago
> NoZebra120vClip@: Wikipedians also use something called a "Committed Identity" which is a cryptographic proof of their identity, which can be used to recover an account if credentials don't work. Since it's encrypte

More ›