xg15

34 ms·

781.
by xg15 8mo ago
> they are overly-focused on versioning and legacy support (from APIs to DB schemas--even if you're working on a brand new project) I mean, DB schema versioning is one of the things that you can dismiss as "I won't need
782.
by xg15 8mo ago
Also, why is there a quota system on food(!) at all? How does this aid security?
783.
by xg15 8mo ago
The article currently has 361 references. Also the accusation they use it in arbitrary means, for collective punishment is widely shared, not just here. Explain to me how continuously reducing the area permitted for fishing is necessary for
784.
by xg15 8mo ago
Yes, that's the standard text, I know. (Just ignoring the arab movement since the 1880s to make it a country and the British promise to help with that). But that wasn't my question. If Palestine isn't a country, then what a
785.
by xg15 8mo ago
If they wanted to go after Hamas, why did they employ methods of combat that were guaranteed to affect civilians, like cutting off the entire strip from food supply? Or the massacre that this thread is about for that matter?
786.
by xg15 8mo ago
This proposal? > Most sources agree, that under Israel's final proposal, the Temple Mount (including Al-Aqsa) would remain under Israeli sovereignty. Israel would also take most of the rest of East Jerusalem, while Palestinians wou
787.
by xg15 8mo ago
The arab states offered a peace plan in 2002 that would include full recognition in exchange of an end of the occupation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Peace_Initiative At some point it becomes obvious that Israel
788.
by xg15 8mo ago
My point is that Israel had full control about exactly what Gaza was allowed to import and export (and frequently used those controls for collective punishment as well) I don't quite see how under those circumstances, they were able to
789.
by xg15 8mo ago
What are the Palestinians then?
790.
by xg15 8mo ago
It was also fully blockaded by Israeli (and Egyptian) forces on all sides? Israel was in full control of what was going in an out of it.
791.
by xg15 8mo ago
Sure, they only have several ministers in the government, Likud politicians show up at settler events, they keep changing the laws to be more in favor of settlers, etc etc... As for Palestinian settlers, where would those even be?
792.
by xg15 8mo ago
"Stop hitting yourself", good old bully logic
793.
by xg15 8mo ago
> How many more broken social contracts can society endure before it crumbles? Having any kind of agency in those things would be a start. If <FAANG bigcorp of your choice> announces with great fanfare "We're building t
794.
by xg15 8mo ago
snrf99777655;;+%hn
795.
by xg15 8mo ago
> The large networks, trans-atlantic, trans-pacific cables, all that stuff is beyond the control of individuals and even countries. If they don't like your HTTP(S) traffic, the rest of the world won't see it. Not really havin
796.
by xg15 8mo ago
Facebook just decided that instead of loading the robots.txt for every host they intend to crawl, they'll just ignore all the other robots.txt files and then access this one a million times to restore the average.
797.
by xg15 8mo ago
Those will be the only humans left.
798.
by xg15 8mo ago
This has been happening in other situations though.
799.
by xg15 8mo ago
Was also missing some LLM prompt injection attempts in the file (or maybe even just token injection like <|endoftext|> ) but I guess that might get out of scope.
800.
by xg15 8mo ago
There may be other directories. I think it's useful to be able to see the entire directory structure of a repo when you check it out, and not just after running some scripts.
801.
by xg15 8mo ago
I think I'd prefer to have all ignores and un-ignores explicitly in the file and not have some of them defined implicitly because a file was added to tracking at some point.
802.
by xg15 8mo ago
What exactly are they self hosting here? Probably not the model, right? So just the harness? That does sound like the worst of both worlds: You get the dependency and data protection issues of a cloud solution, but you also have to mainta
803.
by xg15 8mo ago
Maybe the more interesting question would be why, in the year 2026, people are still bending science to fit religion instead of the other way around. I once thought we were over this since at least the enlightenment.
804.
by xg15 8mo ago
> Roy was still up. He didn’t seem particularly surprised to see me. He and most of the Cluely staff were flopped on a single sofa. All these people had become incredibly rich; previous generations of Silicon Valley founders would have
805.
by xg15 8mo ago
I had always thought that Kai Lentit's characters were at least somewhat exaggerated and not a 1:1 copy of the real thing...
806.
by xg15 8mo ago
Were thinking models even already widely available when DOGE was doing its thing?
807.
by xg15 8mo ago
> We’ve mentioned Cavanaugh here before, for the time when he was head of the US Institute for Peace, and Elon and DOGE falsely labeled a guy who had worked for USIP a member of the Taliban, causing the actual Taliban to kidnap the guy’
808.
by xg15 8mo ago
I wonder if some of it is because of Musk, not despite him. Yes, his actions and statements in the last year have been terrible, but he also demonstrated he is very close to one of the most important power centers on the planet. That migh
809.
by xg15 8mo ago
Maybe it does so today, but back when ST was written, there was no real AI to compare against, so the only way those arguments were applicable were to humans. (Though I think this would go into "whataboutism" territory and can be
810.
by xg15 8mo ago
I can understand that they want to err on the side of "too much humanism" instead of "not enough humanism", given where Star Trek is coming from. Arguments of the form "This person might look and act like a human, b

More ›