xcv123

55 ms·

661.
by xcv123 3y ago
> I have another friend who boots Windows on a cheese grater Mac Pro to play World of Tanks. What has Apple done to prevent the WOT developer releasing it on Mac?
662.
by xcv123 3y ago
Fair enough except for your example. ESO does not support M1/M2. It's running on Rosetta. Bethesda officially do not support M2 so obviously they haven't made any effort to make it run efficiently on an M2. How is that Apples
663.
by xcv123 3y ago
> That's like saying you can't run Firefox without freetype. Requiring a dependency doesn't make you no longer native. At this point you're just trolling. Take notepad.exe and try to run it on Linux. It wont run becau
664.
by xcv123 3y ago
It creates the window and writes the window contents using Windows operating system APIs.
665.
by xcv123 3y ago
There's way more to it than GUI libraries. That is a native Windows application calling Windows APIs. You can't run that Windows executable on Linux without Wine/Proton. Even a console application (no GUI) depends on operatin
666.
by xcv123 3y ago
Can also dual boot a second copy of MacOS on another partition.
667.
by xcv123 3y ago
If the vast majority of games were on the JVM, then the vast majority of games would run on Linux or Mac without Proton or Wine, wouldn't they? That is not the case. Minecraft is probably the only major game that runs on the JVM.
668.
by xcv123 3y ago
No, only a tiny minority of PC games run on the JVM. The vast majority are native and not running on any kind of VM. Even with the Unity engine the games are natively compiled.
669.
by xcv123 3y ago
No shit. That's my point. You said "games are usually not native". Which games? Not sure what you mean by that. Never mind.
670.
by xcv123 3y ago
> Imagine paying $4,999 USD for a device from a company A high spec Mac Mini is $1299 USD (10 core CPU, 16 core GPU, 16 GB). Anyone paying $4,999 for a Mac Studio/Pro is doing media creation for work and doesn't give a fuck abo
671.
by xcv123 3y ago
UI framework? What about everything else such as file system, networking, audio, controller IO, threads, graphics API, etc?
672.
by xcv123 3y ago
M1 Macs can run the Windows version of Steam with Crossover https://www.codeweavers.com/crossover
673.
by xcv123 3y ago
Crossover can run Steam on M1. It uses Wine/Proton/Rosetta and works quite well for many Windows games.
674.
by xcv123 3y ago
Steam does not run natively on Asahi Linux (no ARM build) You have to use an x86 emulator to run Steam on Asahi. Crossover on MacOS would be faster as it uses Rosetta.
675.
by xcv123 3y ago
Install Crossover then run Steam in Crossover. Works with M1.
676.
by xcv123 3y ago
> the answer to this is the introduction of a different algorithm, RLHF, which more accurately fits the model to desired alignment than unsupervised autoregressive loss minimization does. FFS. That's exactly what I have been trying
677.
by xcv123 3y ago
> RLHF computes loss differently from how it is done in pretraining and finetuning. That, alone, constitutes a modification of the logic behind the weighting process. You are confusing yourself and still not quite understanding the basic
678.
by xcv123 3y ago
> Judging by your response, you read 'logic behind the weighting methods' as 'the weights'. I don't think this is a reasonable interpretation unless you're trying to construct a strawman to argue against. So
679.
by xcv123 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37776217
680.
by xcv123 3y ago
> It's fairly clear that they understand that much. No they thought humans are creating and tweaking the models manually. Fundamental misunderstanding.
681.
by xcv123 3y ago
We are talking about the definition of "world model". If you disagree with it then your argument is not technical, it is philosophical in nature. This is like arguing with a religious fundamentalist.
682.
by xcv123 3y ago
The exact same would apply to you. Projection. You are extremely arrogant with your opinions that no one else really agrees with and you talk down to people who disagree. Essentially you are insisting that your own personal definition of &q
683.
by xcv123 3y ago
Here's a definition I found somewhere. Do you agree with it? A "world model" refers to the internal representation of the external environment that an agent (e.g., a human, animal, or machine) maintains and uses to navigate a
684.
by xcv123 3y ago
But you are essentially making a philosophical argument about what defines a "world model". It is a disagreement about a subjective interpretation of the term.
685.
by xcv123 3y ago
Those primitive obsolete models are not the subject of the article. I already have a degree in applied mathematics and computer science and know the basics of machine learning. My questions to you were rhetorical. I wasn't asking you f
686.
by xcv123 3y ago
> Text data doesn't have the information needed to learn a world model from it As I mentioned in another reply you have a philosophical disagreement and are missing the point. It provides "a" model of the world. Not necess
687.
by xcv123 3y ago
You have a subjective philosophical disagreement and are entitled to your opinion but it's not a technical argument. It provides "a" world model and it's a useful model for its intended purpose. Not the "one true mo
688.
by xcv123 3y ago
> they'll continue using 'learn' as a stand-in for 'human learning' even when discussing ml adjacent topics, and that is damaging to effective discourse. Whoever doesn't understand the term are non-experts.
689.
by xcv123 3y ago
> but go ahead and try to understand what the real-world entities I renamed were. Obviously not. Insufficient data. Try that substitution exercise again with terabytes of data (Common Crawl dataset) then feed it into a neural network and
690.
by xcv123 3y ago
> I believe GPT-4 was trained on a server farm, not a single computer. Yes a server farm of Nvidia A100 with supercomputing performance. > It is easy to see how this stuff works. .. you can train a Hidden Markov Model.. No. GPT is not

More ›