xcv123

35 ms·

511.
by xcv123 3y ago
No you have misunderstood. As I wrote above: "But you are not making a technical argument here unless you can define "understand" in technical terms. This is a matter of semantics." I said the nature of their argument is
512.
by xcv123 3y ago
As someone wrote earlier, they won't know the severity until it is analyzed. That could take a long time. Days or weeks. This is just the breaking news. Also what incentive does anyone have to waste their free time analyzing the data a
513.
by xcv123 3y ago
These are journalists publishing breaking news. They are not autistic IT professionals. Relevant quote from the article: "I haven’t gone over the whole data set but Boeing emails and a few others stand out as useful for those with mali
514.
by xcv123 3y ago
> but Sam will be powerless without OpenAI Sam will be leading a new division at Microsoft. He will do alright now that he has access to all of the required resources. > better to observe rather than dig for an entity or a person Yes
515.
by xcv123 3y ago
OpenAI did not invent the transformer architecture. It was not their original research, but they implemented it well. Sam Altman led the company that implemented and executed it. Deep learning is not a secret. It just needs a lot of resourc
516.
by xcv123 3y ago
Are you talking about OpenAI or about Sam Altman's hypothetical new company? OpenAI already had the best technology fully developed and in production when Microsoft invested in them. I believe "cargo cult" means something qui
517.
by xcv123 3y ago
Nothing can guarantee that. Investors always accept risk. He has a better chance than some other random guy who was not the CEO of OpenAI.
518.
by xcv123 3y ago
Elon Musk has a degree in physics. So that addresses the original point. He knows basic physics.
519.
by xcv123 3y ago
Yes, on Twitter. Mailing lists are old boomer shit.
520.
by xcv123 3y ago
Elon Musk has a degree in physics.
521.
by xcv123 3y ago
A human is an ape that is obeying patterns that it has been trained on. What is school but a bunch of apes being trained to obey patterns? Some of these apes do well enough to convince you that it understands things. Some apes fully "u
522.
by xcv123 3y ago
Yes it is easy to find all of this. Huge embarrassment and deeply regretful for Sweden. Criminals saw a weakness and exploited it as hard as possible.
523.
by xcv123 3y ago
Sorry I thought it was obvious. This has been a massive ongoing problem in Sweden for years since they opened the borders to a mass wave of immigration from hellscape African/Middle Eastern parts of the world in the 2010's. It has
524.
by xcv123 3y ago
Obviously the gangs are made up of those immigrants, not native ethnic Swedish people. With the assumption that all sides are painfully aware of that, the connection/causality is being demonstrated very clearly in Sweden today. That&#x
525.
by xcv123 3y ago
Their argument is that the left wing side are responsible, and are incorrectly blaming social factors other than the mass immigration of third world refugees who are now creating a gang ridden hellscape in parts of Sweden, emulating their o
526.
by xcv123 3y ago
You will have to know the basics of calculus, linear algebra, and probability. A few months of study.
527.
by xcv123 3y ago
All of this was in response to your comment earlier: "There is no such thing as a world model, and you don't have one of them." There is such a thing as a world model in humans, and we all have them otherwise we could not thi
528.
by xcv123 3y ago
I stand corrected. Thanks for that explanation.
529.
by xcv123 3y ago
Humans and other creatures only know their sensory data input. Therefore they also don't know the real world. Your eyes and ears perceive a tiny minuscule fraction of what is out there in the real world. A blind and deaf person must kn
530.
by xcv123 3y ago
I did answer your question indirectly. By the reasoning in your argument, you yourself also don't know true or false. Your argument is logically flawed. Do LLMs know true or false? It depends on how you define "know". By some
531.
by xcv123 3y ago
So basically you agree with what I was saying. > What principle can you use to decide how precise it should be? It is not up to me or anyone else to decide. Our subjective definitions and concepts of the model are irrelevant. How the bra
532.
by xcv123 3y ago
> You understand the concept of true vs false. > LLM does not, that isn't how it works. GPT-4 can explain the concept when prompted and can evaluate logic problems better than most human beings can. I would say it has a deeper un
533.
by xcv123 3y ago
> LLMs fundamentally have no self-knowledge ChatGPT can tell me about itself when prompted. It tells me that it is an LLM. It can tell me about capabilities and limitations. It can describe the algorithms that generate itself. It has dee
534.
by xcv123 3y ago
> It's response is not based on facts about the world as it exists, but on the text data it has been trained on How did you find out that Biden was elected if not through language by reading or listening to news? Do you have extra s
535.
by xcv123 3y ago
One of the most ridiculous comments I have read about LLMs here. The ~100 layer deep neural networks infer many levels of features over the text, including the concept of true and false. That is trivial for an LLM. Are you completely unawar
536.
by xcv123 3y ago
The opponents strategy is an unknown variable not determined by the current board state. Therefore the best move cannot be determined by the current board state, as it cannot be determined in isolation from the opponents strategy.
537.
by xcv123 3y ago
> But it can't improve its answer after it has written it, that is a major limitation. It can be instructed to study its previous answer and find ways to improve it, or to make it more concise, etc, and that is working today. That c
538.
by xcv123 3y ago
Oh well in that case the answer is straightforward. If you close your eyes and get lost after a few seconds, that's because that aspect of your model was not a 100% perfect exact replica of external reality that extended infinitely far
539.
by xcv123 3y ago
Oh boy. You are too far gone to reason with. Extreme ultra radical far leftist neo-Marxist bullshit. Totally lost.
540.
by xcv123 3y ago
Strictly obeying their overlords. Ensuring that we don't end up with Skynet and Terminators.

More ›