xaduha

60 ms·

631.
by xaduha 11y ago
You misinterpreted it.
632.
by xaduha 11y ago
> Why not? This isn't a sports team where you're expected to only support one product. Linux/Docker and BSD/jails aren't even in the same league.
633.
by xaduha 11y ago
What you're talking about is a luxury I can't afford. That's what I mean when I talk about the price. There are plenty of far more important technologies that I would rather learn. I can't afford to learn two technologie
634.
by xaduha 11y ago
You're missing the point. Even if jails is the most elegant, easy and powerful technology in the world it's still on BSD. People are not going to switch to BSD just because of jails. Sure, then can use both, but why? Docker and li
635.
by xaduha 11y ago
I'm not comparing Docker and jails, I'm talking about things around. Stackoverflow.com coverage, blogs posts and guides, github repos, publicly available images, etc.
636.
by xaduha 11y ago
And your point is? A suggestion to switch to BSD and jails for an average user of Docker is laughable.
637.
by xaduha 11y ago
> That's basically the argument to use Windows and Windows-based technology and not Linux. Not today it isn't. Years, maybe decades ago it could be. What Linux containers do is help to remove the barrier that various distributi
638.
by xaduha 11y ago
Technology isn't that important here, it's what stems from it is. Adoption, infrastructure, tools, community. There's also a price for doing it differently. And believe you me, using BSD nowadays is the definition of doing th
639.
by xaduha 11y ago
Sure, I'll make a bug report, should it go here? https://github.com/alexpux/mingw-packages BTW thing that I was able to compile with old MSYS + cmake from cmake.org, but can't with MSYS2 and mingw-w64-i686-cm
640.
by xaduha 11y ago
Nope, cmake that was working OOB was installed separately, from https://cmake.org/download I'll try your suggestion and report back.
641.
by xaduha 11y ago
if you already have Linux or OS X running, but just want to compile some stuff for Windows then I'd recommend looking into http://mxe.cc
642.
by xaduha 11y ago
I tried it recently, didn't work with cmake OOB the way old msys did for me.
643.
by xaduha 11y ago
There are http://www.commandlinefu.com and the like. I copy and paste stuff from the web into the shell occasionally, I'm sure everyone does. I do use fish, but it is annoying sometimes, it's missing the most basic stu
644.
by xaduha 11y ago
> One the flip side - what was that database that apple bought then closed sourced without warning? FoundationDB. And as far as I know some important bits of it were proprietary even before Apple bought them, it's just Apple removed
645.
by xaduha 11y ago
I was replying to this line > This is a lot cleaner. The PID stuff can be done with bash too. In any case, until there is a tool which is as ubiquitous and as declarative as make you're going to have hard time convincing those of us
646.
by xaduha 11y ago
Nope, to me it isn't cleaner. Also, make has "make -n" which is absolutely golden.
647.
by xaduha 11y ago
Yep. Split that into bite sized chunks and use something like Amazon Mechanical Turk, as captcha or some other form of crowd-sourcing.
648.
by xaduha 11y ago
There are many ways to solve this, most programming languages already have BigDecimal libraries anyway. Some have Rational numbers. Raw floats shouldn't be a default.
649.
by xaduha 11y ago
No only print, but store too. If the result is mathematically accurate, then what does it matter how it works inside? That's why we use abstractions, for convenience. Yes, there are trade-offs, but that's the price we should be wi
650.
by xaduha 11y ago
Computers are here to help us. Creating abstractions is the name of the game. "Technically correct" isn't the kind of correct we, as humans, want here. Plenty of languages get it right the way you would naively expect alrea
651.
by xaduha 11y ago
~> perl6 -e "say(0.1 + 0.2)" 0.3 ~> nqp -e "say(0.1 + 0.2)" 0.3 ~> perl6 -e "say (0.1 + 0.2).WHAT" (Rat) http://doc.perl6.org/type/Rat
652.
by xaduha 11y ago
Guilty as charged.
653.
by xaduha 11y ago
Ugh.
654.
by xaduha 11y ago
Also, accent marks are never used with day-to-day words outside of primary school and dictionaries.
655.
by xaduha 11y ago
That's neither here, nor there. There are things like AST, various Lisps, etc. It's in the same realm as XSLT, you're not going to go as far as not calling it a programming language, are you? With a proper IDE support it&#x27
656.
by xaduha 11y ago
Depends on what you call code. It produces XML file of that format, there are "source" and "download" buttons.
657.
by xaduha 11y ago
> We've started this project because nobody ever did it I don't think that's entirely true. For example there is EMC XProc Designer[1]. XProc is a mature W3C standard with several open-source implementations. [1] https:&
658.
by xaduha 11y ago
Almost anything is better than PHP, that doesn't make this particular framework standout among many tens of others. In any case, I'm not going to consider using any framework that isn't on the first half of this list https:&
659.
by xaduha 11y ago
Again, I'm only talking about relative security compared to a phone. In any case you can create an encrypted container locally and then upload it to a remote server, doesn't really matter that it was intercepted.
660.
by xaduha 11y ago
It depends on what kind of data it is, but sure, Google DC is fine, as long as you use software/crypto that is considered to be secure and encryption keys are truly yours. But I'd say to look at how people hiding their money from

More ›