Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
x86x87
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
73 ms
·
871.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
At this point I am having trouble understanding who would consider GCP. I mean maybe something along the lines of: something something, multi-cloud strategy, no lock-in options, let's also use GCP so we have multi-cloud. But I never se
872.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
yes. it's a no brainer really. you get GKE and in return you may lose your business if you hit any snags. we're past the point where K8s is this exotic thing where people are not sure exactly where it is.
873.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
nope. nope. nope. are you supposed to write your own firebase? develop your own android? yes, OP learned a hard lesson about Google, but that does not mean that you cannot build stuff using just one provider. you need to do your due dilig
874.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
being able to migrate != support GCP is not going to be a thing in a few years. Why would anyone pick GCP at this point with all the horror stories coming out of there? Yes, support is hard, yes it's expensive, yes it takes time. But a
875.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
If the dust settled why are we still talking about this? If you want my personal opinion: blockchain had/has great potential but once bitcoin exploded the whole crypto world was hijacked by snake oil salesmen whose only goal was to get
876.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
There are a set of rules that applies to everyone and are enforced by everyone. Re: trust the devs: do you trust the electricity in your house? What about the wires in the wall? Do you trust others to follow traffic rules?
877.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
Is it anonymity? Afaik, everything is available on the blockchain (except for maybe some cryptos like Monero).
878.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
Distributed consensus with zero trust.
879.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
Focus on the distributed aspect of it. What does distributed mean to you? In fact if you look at blockchain itself it's not dostributed in the sense that you need all the blocks to verify current state. The innovation is that 2 parties
880.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
You cannot enforce the physical world through virtual means. It does not work. What you can enforce is digital goods via virtual means. Depending of what you want to enforce the presence of a central authority in the physical world may stil
881.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
Imho blockchain == distributed consensus in a low trust environment. When you are talking about a database and managing it you are by default outside of the low trust zone (or there exists an authority that everyone trusts)
882.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
I think there are 2 scenarios really: 1) btc and eth go to zero or 2) we have btc and eth gaining the full recognition and regulation Blockchain as a technology is revolutionary and will be used in niche problems outside of crypto. One thin
883.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
I believe that putting the equal sign between a blockchain and a database is fundamentally wrong. I also think that a lot of "cryptos" were just get rich quick schemes. After the dust settles we will see if blockchain is really us
884.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
Here is a book recommendation for you: Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future Everyone and their dog hates Thiel nowadays but the ideas in the book ring true more than ever. Here is one of the questions asked in the book
885.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
I'll tell you what: if we didn't need to stream hidef movies, see pictures in the internet it would have not taken of like it did. Porn had a lot to do with the pace at which the progress was made. https://www.businessi
886.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
> I think 99% of people watch free/ad-supported porn Huh. You'd be surprised. > anyone concerned about civil asset forfeiture is likely either a criminal, or a conspiracy theorist and/or paranoid schizo This right here
887.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
The narrative that crypto is usefull jusy for buying drugs or laundering money is ridiculous. A couple a weeks ago I did a wire half way across the globe. It took almost 7 days for the money to arrive. With bitcoin? 60 minutes. Remember whe
888.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
Sure. Everything is transient but if something lasts for the rest of your life is it though? Especially if it impacts everything around you. I get the meta point but people are just not wired this way.
889.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
It's not derogatory. Also there are various degrees of being prepared. My point is that past a certain point having some sort of community (other people that have prepped somehow) is key
890.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
now we need to workout? booooo /s
891.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
it works to a certain degree but what's your plan for sleep? what about if an organized group is trying to get to your supplies? so guns work to prevent simple attempts, in the early stages. when you are in the anything goes stage you
892.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
yeah that's fine. i have food and water to last me 3 months. it's not the type of stuff I want to eat (classic emergency food that lasts for 30 years) but it's there. i also stock up on food regularly and i have a buffer wher
893.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
The main thing for me is that prepping only work if there is a transitory situation where a buffer can make it easier to navigate. If we are going full steam ahead towards the collapse of civilization your prepping just delays the inevitabl
894.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
i mean, everyone has their own perspective and can choose to look the other way / explain bad behavior. for me the shark moment was bitcoin. you are right that he did many other things before that that I've maybe written off as ec
895.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
my point is that he is knowledgeable - but the heavy work, the real work is done by the professionals. At best he learns what is going on, at worst he is hindering progress.
896.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
I hate the term quiet quitting. It implies that you're somehow not doing your job. If your employer is not firing you it means by definition that you are doing the job. Quiet quitting is one of those bullshit terms made up by corporate
897.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
there is no point in being a rich country if your citizens, on average, live like crap. you are not rich, a few select ones are wealthy beyond comprehension, there is a constantly shrinking middle class and most people live through hell eve
898.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
Just because something is legal does not mean it's not abusive. Every time you play 5D chess with people's livelihood you are effectively abusing their good will. For Twitter: good luck retaining great employees. Also good luck fi
899.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
I was on the fence when it came to Musk before he started peddling dodgecoin and doing his dog and pony crypto show. that's when i knew he jumped the shark. Before that I was considering a Tesla as my next car. And I was actually excit
900.
▲
by
x86x87
4y ago
well... after shirtshows like this one, software engineers are going to be way more open to unions and actually looking our for their own. not a total loss, if the net effect of this is that it catalyses more critical thinking and in the lo
More ›