x86x87

40 ms·

721.
by x86x87 4y ago
Yes. It's not a TRUE regulation!
722.
by x86x87 4y ago
Are you saying bleach is not carefully regulated? My point was that we are commonly using medication that can have devastating effects - and the precise dosages do not account for the imprecise body weight and sensitivity to the substance o
723.
by x86x87 4y ago
Hmm. Not sure about "risk is really low" part. How low? Is it greater than the risk of dying in a car accident? Are you going to rather not drive a car at all, even of the risk is really low? What are the pros and cons?
724.
by x86x87 4y ago
Sorry. This is an ignorant take. It's not about regularly doing the drugs + therapy with a drug is different from people taking a drug for fun.
725.
by x86x87 4y ago
Lol. Tylenol is over the counter and the wrong dose can literary kill your liver. Do you have links to those studies? I'm curious. I've tried Ashwagandha and stopped as it seemed to make me more anxious but YMMV.
726.
by x86x87 4y ago
So let me get this straight. This person had a hard time on psilocybin and though they should try LSD? Jfc I think it's well known that things can go south really quickly on basically anything that alters your brain chemistry. Yes, the
727.
by x86x87 4y ago
I am not disagreeing. I am just saying their net contributions to society are negative.
728.
by x86x87 4y ago
Yes. They are "serving". Especially Cancun Cruz. Seriously, they are not serving anyone.
729.
by x86x87 4y ago
No. Sorry. This is invalid. It would be pretty bad if we declare some shit illegal and retroactively apply the "law". You will be charged for shit that everyone did and is perfectly fine. For example: How would you like to go to j
730.
by x86x87 4y ago
Hahahahaha Of course. Of course Cruz and Hawley are actually angels that are a victim of circumstances. Collins? Fucking immaculate. I don't know how many times we have to "fight back" when they come uo with this BS. They sho
731.
by x86x87 4y ago
looks like Yahoo! is still a thing. huh. Could have fooled me that it's long dead. I think it's the first time I heard about it in 2-3 years.
732.
by x86x87 4y ago
Meta has peaked a long time ago and now is entering myspace territory.
733.
by x86x87 4y ago
This used to apply back in the day. Nowdays corporations don't give a fudge and will do multiple rounds if it helps them optimize for the short term. This coupled with lack of hiring really really sucks right now but I am sure the whee
734.
by x86x87 4y ago
An idea along the same lines: https://www.cnet.com/culture/eternime-wants-you-to-live-fore... Replacing you after you're dead for your loved ones to keep interacting with you.
735.
by x86x87 4y ago
> There can be a massive overreaction by the government _and_ still be genuine issues we need to look for and address. Mind blown! A person who actually does not dismiss the whole thing as just an overreaction by the gov. Thank you!
736.
by x86x87 4y ago
which part? understaffed and overworked child care workers? non-existing support for parents of kids? sexualization of children? waste of government resources? people dismissing potential signs of sexual abuse? armchair children education e
737.
by x86x87 4y ago
I agree. If we take at face value what is described there this needs attention and is not a "kids being kids" thing. First: being understaffed. Let's pretend that those caregivers are not stessed and overworked /s. Also
738.
by x86x87 4y ago
Yup.CRE + the owners wanting to get back control over the drones. But mostly CRE
739.
by x86x87 4y ago
> ChatGPT should be treated as a person you just met at a bus stop who is well dressed and well spoken but has just told you that you are both waiting for the elevator to arrive at the bus stop. Ahahahahaha. Wow. This is brilliant mate.
740.
by x86x87 4y ago
Oh yes. The old "it's AI" when it's convenient and "it's just a tool" when it's convenient. Which one is it? I this it's just an autocomplete on steroids, a powerful bullshitting machine. The fea
741.
by x86x87 4y ago
yes yes. how could making it harder to track + automatically redirect you to the https version of a website make you less susceptible to scams? some people...
742.
by x86x87 4y ago
Here is the claim that triggered your gymnastics: > They did murder an American journalist for criticising their rules in his writing In your quest to bust the myth that they killed an American journalist you are missing the point. The p
743.
by x86x87 4y ago
Yes, it is more intelligent. Also, given enough time that protozoa can evolve. GPT4 cannot. In fact GPT4 makes zero sense if humans are not involved and are not using it as a tool. It's a tool we have created. The problem when talking
744.
by x86x87 4y ago
Challenge for you: how do you define intelligence?
745.
by x86x87 4y ago
I don't know what planet you're from but for me the I in AGI stands for intelligence. Nothing today is even close to intelligence. We have behavior that we, humans, perceive as intelligent in a very narrow sense. Intelligence impl
746.
by x86x87 4y ago
Randomness is the proverbial large enough army of monkeys that could produce Shakespeare's works given enough time. ChatGPT is the large monkey army that got access to Shakespeare's work and are parroting part of it while also sli
747.
by x86x87 4y ago
Look into nextdns: https://nextdns.io/ Set it up on all devices + aggressively make it filter crap (there are block lists you can leverage) Ublock + privacy badger + https anywhere Other more extreme approaches: get him a r
748.
by x86x87 4y ago
Your mental gymnastics are through the roof.
749.
by x86x87 4y ago
The lesson here is that discrete is good enough. You can get better results by shrinking the physical representation of the ones and zeros.
750.
by x86x87 4y ago
Yes, yes! Even more "AI". That's the solution! The old age garbage in, garbage out will finally be defeated!

More ›