Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
x1798DE
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
92 ms
·
871.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
It is very very unlikely that you'll be able to duplicate keys using any kind of laser scanning technology, that's just not how they work. You could probably get the appropriate shape of the keyway, but you wouldn't be able
872.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
It seems Rupert Murdoch did this with NewsCorp about 5 years ago, and the decision seems to have been reversed since then: http://www.ibtimes.com/rupert-murdoch-vs-google-google-wins-...
873.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
This only adds the ability to copy keys with momentary access to your keys. Anyone with sustained access to your keys can just take them down to the hardware store, so this doesn't really change the "spurned lovers" equation.
874.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I find it very unlikely that you've given this a thorough cost-benefit analysis. For one thing, automobiles were invented after alcohol but before breathalyzers, and we got along more or less just fine without having to put a bunch of
875.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I feel like this is a complete misunderstanding of the threat model here. Keys are not "like passwords", because to use a key you need to physically go up to someone's door, whereas with a password, you can generally do so fr
876.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
There is no story downvoting. At a higher karma level you can downvote comments. It seems like it's not published anywhere what that number is, but you can figure it out easily enough by googling around.
877.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
If someone tried to take over my twitter handle and domain name, I would be upset. If someone used the same name that I am using for an internet nickname for myself (a person) for their company, I would essentially not care. At worst I'
878.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
What surprises me the most is that this came from the author of the paper, not the publisher. In my experience, authors don't see any kind of royalties from any publication fees, and generally there are even fees (often significant o
879.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I think that's definitely his mock logo, not the original. The original logo is anti-aliased and thin, not in that blocky 8-bit style. You can also see the squared-off "NeoFossil" logo above, not the rounded New Relic logo. I
880.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I don't really see it as a dick move. They're not appropriating this guy's brand or pretending to be him. The worst that's happened so far is he got a few tweets not meant for him. He's not going to lose any busines
881.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
This article isn't in the main namespace, it's in the Wikipedia namespace, which is dedicated for essays and meta discussions about Wikipedia. The rules for deletion of Wikipedia-namespace articles are very different than the rule
882.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I'm not sure that article attention is necessarily always going to be the limiting factor, otherwise you'd expect there to be piles and piles of fancruft all over Wikipedia, meticulously maintained by obsessive fans. One argument
883.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
Doesn't seem to have gotten this popular account suspended: https://twitter.com/untitledairlane
884.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm fairly certain that trademarks are not all-contextual , as trademark infringement requires likelihood of confusion. It's certainly possible that there's enough likelihood of confusion here, bec
885.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
> It feels like asking for transparency, but only from others. Same reason I can't truly trust Bitcoin, it's as shady as my bank's processes. What additional information would get get from the name of the people behind th
886.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
A twist on the previous question, would there be any way for me to deliberately choose to be completely ignorant of what I am serving, like running a Tor relay node (or like in Filecoin, if I understand that protocol correctly)? I would be
887.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
> This is all really just an expansion of "they're worried about some sort of liability." In any case that's by far the likelier of the two; I can't imagine you could sell IP related to this. I more or less agre
888.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
Partially that - I don't visit many web sites regularly that require Javascript, but most of the ones I do visit regularly are more or less trustworthy. The biggest problem I have with the whole whitelisting thing is that so many peopl
889.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I've been using NoScript for several months now. Seemed crazy at first, but now it doesn't really feel all that inconvenient. If anything, I just tend to get upset with the serious proliferation of needless Javascript out there. I
890.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
It's possible, but I think that's the paranoid / Hollywood spy version of this. Not saying that this sort of thing doesn't happen - the spy agencies take themselves very seriously but aren't big on effective policie
891.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
>In the age of mobile phones that can get the time directly from GPS satellites with sub-100ns accuracy, the isolated hardware clock of a typical server strikes me as an arcane method of keeping time. Genuinely curious, is it actually tr
892.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
Almost everywhere on earth is currently "within range of missile attacks" without any reliable missile defense shield protecting us. From the report, this was during Operation Desert Storm and they were in an Army barracks. Given
893.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I have to imagine that this is for some sort of internal bureaucratic reason. I don't see who is in a position to even want to stop this talk - almost certainly not the Tor project itself. The mundane (and thus most likely) answer is
894.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
I would guess that the vast majority of users don't know enough to have an opinion about the security and privacy of their browsing experience, but would be in support of such improvements if it caused them no inconvenience. Law and &q
895.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
Alternatively, it's usually possible to heap tax money on the inefficient government option to allow it to have an incredibly low "sticker price" because they charge everyone for the service whether or not they use the serv
896.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
It's not a server, but I've seen machines used in physics simulations have something on the order of 256 GB RAM in them. As far as I know they cost maybe $20k-$30k, so not absurdly expensive. I don't think addressing that mem
897.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
Devil's advocate - if for some reason you're using "while(<constant evaluating to true>)" to do something other than wait for some kind of event, and if whatever you're doing is fast but repeated a huge number
898.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
Yeah, I assume that you can just have a non-deterministic expansion which will add some entropy per word to increase the entropy of the passphrase over the abbreviated version, but my point was just that even if there's no increase in
899.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
> It seems we all want a situation with the regulations, guarantees and protections that are currently provided by the laws AND the convenience and benefits of Uber. Unfortunately they are mutually exclusive. If we allowed taxis to charg
900.
▲
by
x1798DE
12y ago
> If the volume mounting scripts packaged with TrueCrypt get updated To be clear, it would be a serious coup if this happened in TrueCrypt itself. The developers have made it very clear that TrueCrypt is now an abandoned project. They&#
More ›