x-complexity

9 ms·

91.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> I needed 1 database per tenant ...Depending on how many tenants that is, Turso may fit your use case. https://turso.tech/
92.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> > if you just turn javascript off that gets rid of 99% > Given how websites are built these days, if you just turn javascript off, half of them, if not more, will become unusable. Basically any webapp with any amount of processin
93.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> In this case the woman is obviously mostly writing this because she doesn't like OpenAI specifically, but she has an argument and it is a good one. Until the same measures are uniformly taken with the rest of the actors in the ind
94.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> In this context, never. Especially because the parent knows you will always ask 2+2 and can just teach the child to say “four” as their first and only word. You’ll be on to them, too. On the assumption that you 'll always only
95.
by x-complexity 1y ago
... It might be a pursuit worth making a small library for.
96.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> Yes, and it belongs to us. It's not theirs to sell to the highest bidder. Your attention belongs to you , until you give it to someone else . The videographer has the right to sell sponsorships on their videos in exchange the
97.
by x-complexity 1y ago
I haven't seen anyone say this out loud, so here's my $0.02: Since every box is either filled in (1) or not (0), a solved 5x5 nonogram can be encoded as a 25-bit unsigned integer. So would a 6x6 (36), 7x7 (49), 8x8 (64), etc. ...
98.
by x-complexity 1y ago
Pretty much no disagreements IMO. By the time the CSE-5 is rolled out, it * needs* at least 500GB of SRAM to make it worthwhile. Multi-layer wafer stacking's the only path to advance this chip.
99.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> Advertising is theft of attention which is extremely limited in supply. I'd even say it's mind rape. They forcibly insert their brands and trademarks into our minds without our consent. They deliberately ignore and circumvent
100.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> Furthermore, if we use a proof-of-work system that's shared with an actual cryptocurrency, so as to actually get payment from these hashes, then we have a new problem: ASICs. Cryptocurrencies have to be secured by a globally agree
101.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> > All of the cost is tied to compliance. A Swift message costs pennies, it's the due diligence behind it that banks charge for. Stablecoins will not change the compliance requirements. > I don’t see how crypto boosters get a
102.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> > Even so, the two cannot be connected without adding the human-centric context node to the graph. > The entire graph is human-centric context. It doesn't exist outside of our PoV. (physics/chemistry/maths) can exi
103.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> > This bypasses the intentional sabotage that’s been applied to bay area public transit. Of course, it’ll still be much, much worse than a competent bus system. I wonder how well it will work in other countries. > Why will it be
104.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> The other way around. What does leaded gasoline have to say about the connection of physics/chemistry/math to the concepts of vice and virtue. Again, there are no connections between (physics/chemistry/maths) and (v
105.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> > Physics/chemistry/math has nothing to say about vice and virtue. > Leaded gasoline. Again, as GP mentioned, there's a failure in linking how (Physics/chemistry/math) imposes morality on (leaded gasoline
106.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> The comment I replied to defended US individualism and criticised the Japanese "cultural toll". The comment you replied to came from *me*. It was *me* that you replied to with: > > > What's interesting to me is
107.
by x-complexity 1y ago
Dummy calculations aren't even needed, if you allow the LLMs to pre-compute on the given context before inference: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13171 It should be noted that this type of inference is less useful on
108.
by x-complexity 1y ago
As noted by an earlier reply ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43905660 ), I agree with the first 3 paragraphs. The last paragraph, however, is a launch in accusations, and will be treated as such. ---- > What's
109.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> The idea that lunches can be freshly made, on site, out of healthy ingredients and children are active participants in serving and cleaning up is just crazy. > When I encountered it for the first time I felt like a big part of my ch
110.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> That was the Docker manifesto. It essentially still is. Unless the Dockerfiles are kept secret, any container can be replicated from the given Dockerfile. Barring extreme (distro/system/hardware)-level quirks, a Docker contai
111.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> You might like MCP then. That's entirely different to what's being desired by GP. > > My dream tooling is for every tool to have an terminal interface so that I can create comprehensive megabooks to get all the context
112.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> In other words, people like the idea of this, but no one actually wants this. Misinterpretation of data. > The other day I saw the results of a poll [1] where 80% of Americans thought the country would be better off if more Americ
113.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> This actually so amateurish and cliche it's painful. The fact people like this shows that art never had a chance when the masses have no taste. This makes me depressed for artists and the future. This kind of rhetoric can best be
114.
by x-complexity 1y ago
> Instead, phrasing it as "wouldn't you prefer it if **we** paid the same amount of money every month and when we go to the hospital we don't have to worry about any out of pocket costs?" This really nailed the point
115.
by x-complexity 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS It's a filesystem, to put it simply.
116.
by x-complexity 2y ago
Again, another regulatory decision that makes a niche worse off overall.... Abuses of a carve-out aside, having a "Sunlight mimicking" exemption would solve this, with the added conditions that they have to actually stick to the E
117.
by x-complexity 2y ago
....Overall neutral. The closest similarity I could see based from Regent's past is Sunset magazine, which still seems to be doing well & printing physical issues. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunset_(magazine
118.
by x-complexity 2y ago
Given the absolute behemoth of scope laid out in the W3C specs, I don't think that's even possible. https://codetabs.com/count-loc/count-loc-online.html Using LadybirdBrowser/ladybird & ignoring the
119.
by x-complexity 2y ago
> > Potentially unrelated, but isn’t anarchy-communism also an oxymoron? > Communism implies anarchism. The economic system of communism in no way implies that it would be achieved via anarchic means; It only outlines that the part
120.
by x-complexity 2y ago
> Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron. Capitalism creates hierarchies. Anarchy is a rejection of hierarchies, because it creates rulers. Incomplete understanding: Under the ideals of anarcho-captialism, the capitalism part stresses any int

More ›