wyuenho

48 ms·

451.
by wyuenho 13y ago
How complicated your query have to be to run into these QSA bugs? Don't forget that you are paying a very high performance cost for compatibility. I mean, how many people are still on Chrome 21 and Firefox 3.5?
452.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Nope. jQuery 2 just removed code for IE 6/7/8. Nothing was added. Code sized reduced, but almost the same performance. My benchmark shows only 10-15% improvement. That's nothing compared to using the DOM API straight up.
453.
by wyuenho 13y ago
1) Zepto is POS. It offers the illusion of jQuery compatibility while delivering only maybe 80% of it. You simply cannot reverse-engineer something 100% without doing everything the original does, so you might as well use jQuery. 2) In 2014
454.
CSP (Content Security Policy)(developer.mozilla.org)
2 points by wyuenho 13y ago|0 comments
455.
by wyuenho 13y ago
PHP 4 and PHP 5 weren't compatible either. How come migration was so much more successful over there than Python 2 to Python 3?
456.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Scala also was often not source compatible during 2.7 -> 2.8 because of the huge changes in the standard library.
457.
by wyuenho 13y ago
I see the repo the Github Docs points to is a fork of https://github.com/DynoSRC/dynosrc , which one is actually the canonical repo? BTW, how does differential updates do under minification? Don't the differences u
458.
Acoustic cryptanalysis(cs.tau.ac.il)
30 points by wyuenho 13y ago|0 comments
459.
CSS bundler for modular UI components, like browserify but for CSS(github.com)
1 points by wyuenho 13y ago|0 comments
460.
by wyuenho 13y ago
package.json doesn't have any place to define the styles and templates your component exports, so browserify can't meaningfully resolve dependencies and build your assets for you. For really good support, you'll need to be ab
461.
by wyuenho 13y ago
I've written about JS modules in the past. https://medium.com/what-i-learned-building/5a31feb15e2 While I think OP's link is quite informative, I think it suffers from the same oversight as most others on thi
462.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Does anyone know why pretty much all of the PARC's successors choose to orient their monitors in "landscape" mode as opposed to "portrait" as was done on the PARC? Reading and working is so much easier in portrait m
463.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Can someone explain to me why Reuters is reporting a completely different result from the WMO? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/06/greenhouse-gas-emis...
464.
by wyuenho 13y ago
I wrote this: http://backgridjs.com/
465.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Whoa I sense passive-aggressiveness :) I'm still waiting for those benchmarks. The code is very clean and simple I was just picking bones. The use case seems to be overly specific tho. Is there any other example use cases where this li
466.
by wyuenho 13y ago
I'm baffled by the choice of using the GNU autofools chain just to include a Doxygen target in the Makefile. The whole thing is essentially straight up C with just 1 library dependency. The command line argument processing is also quit
467.
by wyuenho 13y ago
It doesn't matter whether they are used or not by the JVM, to the OS, they are allocated and gone. Startup time is a moot point in long running apps.
468.
by wyuenho 13y ago
With Go using 20 times less memory, I'd take Go any day since I can just throw in 20 more processes and up my throughput 5-10x. But of course, scaling like this takes a bit of design and the processes have to share nothing.
469.
by wyuenho 13y ago
The spec still hasn't been finalized, so some inconsistencies are expected.
470.
by wyuenho 13y ago
While this paper is quite easy and occasionally funny to read, being a total math idiot, I need somebody to help me out how to read the benchmarks at the end. The author claims that on average converting stack-based bytecode to register-bas
471.
by wyuenho 13y ago
http://tomdale.net/2012/01/amd-is-not-the-answer/
472.
How does the algorithm to color the song list in iTunes 11 work?(stackoverflow.com)
6 points by wyuenho 13y ago|0 comments
473.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Backbone's View is incredibly slow and is very ill-suited for views that need 1000+ of them on a single page. The reason is not so much Backbone's code is particularly inefficient but the fact that Backbone.View creates a separate a jQuery
474.
by wyuenho 13y ago
I'm quite interested in what provoked OP to post this.
475.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Ah thanks for clarifying. I couldn't find a minified version of aTable on your Github repo so I couldn't double check. A number of people have asked me what I used to generate the documentation. The truth is I didn't use any. I just hand-co
476.
by wyuenho 13y ago
Agreed, and also failed to promote my project a few times on HN. In January I've decided to take a different route and promote on /r/javascript instead and all of a sudden it got bumped to number 1. Got picked up by tbranyen and eventually
477.
by wyuenho 14y ago
Also related, when is the HTML working group going to introduce a timeout attribute?
478.
by wyuenho 14y ago
This only works if the CDN actually returns 4xx or 5xx codes. This still won't work if the CDN is getting DDOS'ed, as in taking forever to return anything.
479.
Signs that you're a good programmer(sites.google.com)
129 points by wyuenho 14y ago|58 comments
480.
Live map of BPD police locations(maps.google.com)
1 points by wyuenho 14y ago|0 comments

More ›