wybiral

128 ms·

1. 601.▲
   Intro to x86 Assembly(youtube.com)

   1 points by wybiral 9y ago|0 comments
2. 602.▲
   by wybiral 9y ago

   To quote myself from the last FB thread: > Same here. But different people value different things out of relationships. I prefer to have a handful of people close to me and don't seek out daily updates on everyone else. > In fact
3. 603.▲
   by wybiral 9y ago

   Same here. But different people value different things out of relationships. I prefer to have a handful of people close to me and don't seek out daily updates on everyone else. In fact, I enjoy running into those people or meeting up w
4. 604.▲
   by wybiral 9y ago

   It really depends on the people and the mood, imo. I've played with groups where it's like that but I've also played with groups where the answers were more interesting.
5. 605.▲
   Show HN: Open Source Quantum Circuit Simulator (Browser-Based)(github.com)

   3 points by wybiral 9y ago|2 comments
6. 606.▲
   by wybiral 9y ago

   Exactly. You're only one / away from bad times.
7. 607.▲
   by wybiral 9y ago

   On a serious note I've always thought that the convention of entering in potentially revealing commands into the same box that you enter in chat text was a flaw of IRC.
8. 608.▲
   by wybiral 9y ago

   Again, these weren't active diplomats. This was more of an act of racism and terrible ethics by the experimenters. But the backlash from it caused several changes to the law and the formation of commissions to regulate this kind of beh
9. 609.▲
   by wybiral 9y ago

   That's one possible theory about an event that happened in the 1890's.
10. 610.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    If this is true there's a way we can block the effects... > In 1962, Allan H. Frey discovered that the microwave auditory effect, i.e., the reception of the induced sounds by radio-frequency electromagnetic signals heard as clicks a
11. 611.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    I agree. Sometimes it's interesting to look at the difference between what the media is actually saying vs what people think the media is saying.
12. 612.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    I find it difficult to believe that the CIA would authorize an experiment that causes brain damage in our own active diplomats.
13. 613.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    That was a rejected proposal. (There are probably all kinds of crazy military proposals that get rejected)
14. 614.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    Could something like this alter human behavior? Maybe the goal wasn't to cause damage or to attract this much attention but was instead meant to induce erratic behavior or something. (I'm venturing into tin-foil-hat-zone here beca
15. 615.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    Agreed. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
16. 616.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    I get the impression that when non-security people talk about "security" these days it's almost always in the context of preventing government surveillance. So even though Google has a great track record of keeping hackers fr
17. 617.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    Not in the least. I just noticed that you seem to have a bit of an agenda. Nothing wrong with that, but you've presented more rhetoric than fact as far as I can see.
18. 618.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=longcheng
19. 619.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    There's a big difference between state censorship and news companies being biased in what stories they promote. I think you're distorting the lines between the internet as a communication network and the news industry who uses tha
20. 620.▲
    Is Lisa Holst responsible for the myth that everyone eats 8 spiders a year?(skeptics.stackexchange.com)

    1 points by wybiral 9y ago|0 comments
21. 621.▲
    Ask HN: What's the story behind Bruce Schneier and squids?(schneier.com)

    2 points by wybiral 9y ago|1 comments
22. 622.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    That seems like an absurd step to require for every upload. Their algorithm should really give me the benefit of the doubt after having required manual review dozens of times and always having my content remonetized.
23. 623.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    That's a good point. I've seen my captioning be WAY off from what I actually said. But when I request a manual review the videos do seem to get monetized again within a few days... Even with less than 1000 views.
24. 624.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    Predicting the behavior of 4chan seems nigh impossible to me.
25. 625.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    I'm more inclined to think that the algorithms are just a bit naive at this point. Surely some advertisers out there do want to target that market. The notice on my videos is: Limited or no ads due to content identified as not suitabl
26. 626.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    Interesting. Maybe YouTube needs to adjust their algorithm for that category or something.
27. 627.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6tqFmkqznYJTzidBerHA8g The video from yesterday (08 - CSS and static files) is still demonetized. If that gives you any context.
28. 628.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    Or it's possible that people from those sources report his videos. But my own videos get demonetized almost instantly and none of mine have weird referral links as far as I can tell.
29. 629.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    The series before this one was about Golang and they all got demonetized too.
30. 630.▲
    by wybiral 9y ago

    For the video I uploaded yesterday, in the source for the video I can see: "excluded_ads": "46=14_14; 59=14_14; 76=2_2_1,2_2_4; 102=1_1,1_3,2_1,2_3; 106=1_1,1_2_1,1_3,2_1,2_2_1,2_2_4,2_3,14_14,17_2_1,17_2_4" EDIT: This m