Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wyager
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
241.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Soft "sciences" don't have enough predictive power to, on expectation, improve this situation to any meaningful degree
242.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Lysenkoism persisted in the Soviet Union because people who pointed out the inconsistencies too straightforwardly would find themselves in hot water. Anyone who wanted to discuss the issue had to approach it somewhat obliquely. Most people
243.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Computer industries have correlated psychometric selection effects with a bunch of subcultures. Many of these select for e.g. what is colloquially referred to as "autism", although that term refers to several probably-unrelated th
244.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Thinking this is about science per se betrays a very naïve understanding of the political dynamics involved. It's quite easy to come up with examples where the official progressive position is nonscientific; Lysenkoism, for example,
245.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> I don't know the cause of this. I think it's pretty clear when you analyze it from the perspective of Selectorate Theory (c.f. Bueno De Mesquita's Logic of Political Survival ). Basically, there's a natural tendenc
246.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
For a lot of the iCE40 chips, it's extremely difficult to reliably get fMax > 50MHz even with extremely aggressive pipelining. I assume 80MHz is only possible on the highest-speed parts in the iCE40 family I switched a design from i
247.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
So on the one hand you had Twitter, where the impression you would have had in the first few days of November is that Trump was probably going to win the election. On the other hand you had most other platforms like Reddit, with relatively
248.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
It seems like his objection is that "parsing formal grammars" isn't the point of LLMs, which is fair. He was wrong about RGs vs CFGs, but I would bet that the majority of programmers are not familiar with the distinction, and
249.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> Anthropic has moved so much slower than its competitors In what sense? Claude is way better than any other LLM available, in the sense of providing useful/correct/intelligent output.
250.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> How about you, what’s your plan? I can tell you that it doesn't involve condescendingly lecturing blue collar workers about my culture being superior to theirs
251.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> What leads one to have feelings about a language anyway? Not a single person reading this thread believes that you are a coolly detached rational observer Responding to an argument by not only pretending not to have an opinion, but pre
252.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> Java's latest addition of green threads is 100% lifted from Go. Why do you say it was lifted from Go and not from one of the places Go lifted it from, like the two I mentioned? > Rust and Zig's built-in language tooling Ma
253.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> since Go was released it seems every other language has tried to copy it What are you referring to here? I would consider myself quite well-apprised of recent developments in PL theory (and practice) and I am struggling to come up with
254.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
I mean, if you have a coherent explanation for why you made that comparison, it should be pretty easy to communicate... Your response as it stands is not doing much to fight the "Go enthusiasts are Blub Paradox victims" perception
255.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> Really I think it's more useful to view it as a better C But Go is nothing at all like C, and it's completely unsuitable for most of the situations where C is used. I'm having trouble even imagining what you're gett
256.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Having written probably several hundred kloc of both Haskell and OCaml, I strongly prefer Haskell. A very simple core concept wrapped in an extremely powerful shell. Haskell is a lot better for parsing tasks because (among other considerati
257.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Golang was created specifically so that Google could mitigate the downsides from lower their hiring standards. It doesn't have any higher design aspirations. "The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researc
258.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
What exactly is your plan to achieve this "needed" change?
259.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
How long do you think it will take you to update your priors on this?
260.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
This is such a hilarious objection. Do people use gold or equities or real estate to buy coffee? Well then I guess they must all be some kind of bubble
261.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
If you have this attitude, you aren't cut out to work in the trades
262.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
The lower your performance requirements, the more you can loosen up what kind of programmers you hire. A dev who can only use <insert high level GC'd language known for being easy to use/easy to hire for> is relatively quite
263.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Haskell, any ML, Rust, etc. TS is on par with any crufty ad-hoc type system like that of Java or C++. The TS type system is neither especially powerful nor especially robust
264.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
I don't find "performance parity with Mathematica" to be very compelling. Mathematica is a CAS system, not something I would use to write fast code.
265.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
> the most robust type-system in the world (Typescript) The rare combo of Blub Paradox + Poe's Law
266.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
I would take that to mean "strict evaluation" and "simple type system"
267.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
Yeah, but I don't expect this to be substantively harder than learning most regional accents (could be wrong), and afaik it's also not critical for legibility.
268.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
I've been (very) casually learning Japanese for a couple years, and almost every time I think I find something "weird" that Japanese does, I almost immediately think of a very similar example in English. The alphabet is a pre
269.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
To use an overextended computer metaphor: serializing data structures to a wire format forces lazy evaluation, turning up any errors that were previously hidden by laziness.
270.
▲
by
wyager
2y ago
As this article discusses, it's not really viable that existing codebases will be able to benefit from safe C++ research without massive rewrites anyway
More ›