wtf_is_up

27 ms·

271.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
I'm surprised that people actually like make and autotools.
272.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
>Go in my opinion is the best proof that our industry is fashion driven. It's not though. What is fashionable about Go? Most testimonies I've seen state solid reasons for choosing it. Nobody claims it to be a marvelous language
273.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
I'm enjoying beego. It provides most of what I need. I don't use the ORM because I like the flexibility of lib/pq + sqlx. I could do without it, but I like what it offers. The bee tool is nice. It lets you quickly bootstrap a
274.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
Many others were able to send pull requests. What's you're issue?
275.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
Agreed. We must also consider what a pain in the ass it was to set up the toolchains and/or runtimes for several of the tested languages. I'm willing to trade a little performance and do a little extra error checking if it means I
276.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
interface{}
277.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
A pure Go SNMP lib that supports SNMPv3 would be amazing.
278.
by wtf_is_up 12y ago
The Arch AUR has a PKGBUILD up. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/atom-editor-git
279.
by wtf_is_up 13y ago
Go doesn't belong to Google.
280.
by wtf_is_up 13y ago
That's not what I meant. I was just replying to parent that was, to me, implying that Google had a huge team working on Go.
281.
by wtf_is_up 13y ago
The Go team at Google consists of a handful of people: http://thechangelog.com/100/
282.
by wtf_is_up 13y ago
No. It's simple to build Go toolchains for whatever your deploy os/arch target is. Then you just cross-compile. * Download Go source * Extract, cd go/src/ * GOOS=linux GOARCH=386 ./make.bash #this will build the li