wrsh07

15 ms·

241.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Yeah, mostly super long form stuff. If it's only 2 minutes it's faster for me to just read it than to open it in their reader Fwiw, I would use their app way more if it were better. Right now I use it for 1-2 long form articles at
242.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Yeah - I've experienced this with eleven reader (I don't think you can gen text this long anymore using the reader app, lol) but switching voices fixed it for me I can go back and try to repro and get a recording....
243.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Wow really? I use it all the time for ~equivalent activities
244.
by wrsh07 2y ago
You are going to see a lot of people (both hype and skeptic) tell you things that you can verify. Even while you have a screenshot verifying the opposite of what they are claiming, they will continue to claim it. For skeptics in particular,
245.
by wrsh07 2y ago
I suspect the answer is closer to "one trans person preyed upon the trust and vulnerability of people in their circle" and that happened to include multiple other trans people (who were likely extremely vulnerable to the charismat
246.
by wrsh07 2y ago
This is obviously an over-the-top response. I quoted what you said: > of course I wouldn't be onboard with whoever is committing a genocide And asked if you were familiar with these particular atrocities. These particular atrocities
247.
by wrsh07 2y ago
> with whoever is committing a genocide... Are you perhaps not aware of this issue? https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/20/world/asia/china-genocide... Or do you not consider it genocide?
248.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Sorry what? I'm pretty sure HN is accessible in Germany. Are you trying to say there's some utilitarian principle where countries should allow companies from other countries to operate unrestricted? I'm a fan of free trade! T
249.
by wrsh07 2y ago
You can run it all locally: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.vscode
250.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Given how it is trained specifically (they didn't encourage it to think, they allowed it to) there was a lot of emergent behavior as it trained. Sort of like chess engines rediscovering classic (named) chess openings. See section 2.2.3
251.
by wrsh07 2y ago
This specific law draws the line at social media. That seems reasonable! As a rough heuristic, compare advertising on social media vs on traditional tv. Note: we've actually (intentionally) reduced the effectiveness of online advertisi
252.
by wrsh07 2y ago
It's obviously fine to be this cynical, but I think the particular shape your cynicism takes is incorrect^ and I also tend to think people who are overly cynical willingly reduce their ability to affect change ^ the description of camp
253.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Out of curiosity, did the US also push Russia to invade Georgia? What about Crimea^? ^ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Ukrainian_War
254.
by wrsh07 2y ago
This is an absolutely unhinged take. The US doesn't allow more than 25% foreign ownership of broadcast media. That's not some "free speech" violation. If a foreigner wants to say something, they have many ways to do it.
255.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Those are very different things!
256.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Sorry I'm confused by your comment. The American voter voted for Congress. A bipartisan majority passed this bill easily. The executive branch signed it. The judiciary branch confirmed it. Where is the American voter being sidelined?
257.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Citation for the real example: https://stratechery.com/2019/the-china-cultural-clash/ Ben Thompson's 2020 piece about banning TikTok: https://stratechery.com/2020/the-tiktok-war/ No
258.
by wrsh07 2y ago
The easiest real example I'm aware of is that there was a scandal around the Houston rockets and China (years ago) and you could not find their content or content related to them on TikTok. (You could for every other NBA team) In this
259.
by wrsh07 2y ago
For cursor you can chat and ask @codebase and it will do rag (or equivalent) to answer your question
260.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Gah I can see why you would be confused Yes yes, I was trying to show "here's a simplification one made to train a simple network how to do a hard thing" and much like removing pedals, I think it's effective Unrelated, i
261.
by wrsh07 2y ago
There's a great (underrated) video on YouTube about training a neural network to manage a double pendulum It changes gravity! This is sort of like managing a double pendulum under water^ and then trying it in the air The video: https:
262.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Chandler discusses it in this video though! https://youtu.be/ZI198eFghJk You get some traversals for free with this layout (preorder, reverse post order). Can search for subtrees with string searching algorithms or more com
263.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Fwiw, we have other mechanisms for limiting taxis and Uber. We can actually put a hard limit on the number allowed to operate. This ends up being a little awkward since Uber charges market prices, so what happens when the number of Uber dri
264.
by wrsh07 2y ago
You also need to do the opposite experiment Have two people put their phones in the microwave (don't run it!) / turn them off, discuss swimming pools (or jacuzzis etc), and see if you suddenly start seeing ads for said thing. And
265.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Right - it's somewhat similar to code review Sometimes one person is looking for an improvement in this area while someone else cares more about that other area This is totally reasonable! (Ideally if they're contradicting each ot
266.
by wrsh07 2y ago
I expect it largely has to do with "scale" We have an enormous amount of high quality programming samples. From there it's relatively straightforward to bootstrap (similar to original versions of alphago - start with human ga
267.
by wrsh07 2y ago
I have really enjoyed reading some of the better explained pages. I wouldn't recommend most people start on calculus on that site, but since you requested it specifically here's the overview: https://betterexplained.com
268.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Isn't this resorting to algebra to fix the visual proof? How do you fix it visually?
269.
by wrsh07 2y ago
I'm not sure I quite understand what the visual proof looks like if they're negative
270.
by wrsh07 2y ago
Which constraints on a,b (besides positive) does this proof require?

More ›