Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
written-beyond
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
It's still okay to do that, LLMs models are literally terabytes big I'm sure they've crammed enough information in there and enough verification tools to be extremely accurate. Now whether the information matches your true in
92.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I've had friendships broken because people couldn't understand why I didn't appreciate their "hard work" on writing a series of 10 articles they wrote with Claude. Mind you this person is an excellent writer, they h
93.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I never "learned" react because the "create react app" would literally never install for me in the early days. There were literally so many dependencies I never got it to build as a novice, I tried svelte everything work
94.
▲
Auth in 2LOC
(shoo.dev)
1 points
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
|
0 comments
95.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I saw a video of a Chinese phone that did something like that. Their implementation was a privacy and security nightmare but basically it shared a active feed of your screen with an LLM and would literally tap, type and swipe to achieve you
96.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Writing the spec is becoming the default for pet projects. Which would be a good thing if the spec wasn't also partly written by an LLM. You can already see people running into these issues, they have a spec in mind. They work on the s
97.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I never said anything against using LLMs. You're projecting. Any engineer worth their weight will always try to avoid adding code. Any amount of code you add to a system, whether is written by you or a all knowing AI is a liability. If
98.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
You don't, and as long as you're comfortable with that you keep prompting to dig yourself out of holes. The problem is unless your ready to waste hours prompting to get something exactly how you want it, instead of spending those
99.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
That's really cool, I can see the utility in it but why on this earth would anyone want this for anything other than doing internal integration tests. I can see a company who spends upwards of $2000 a month on just slack, but can you j
100.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Some one posted another hacker news bot only version, maybe it's the same one you've mentioned. Real people were the ones making posts on there, and due to a lack of moderation, it quickly devolved into super xenophobic posts just
101.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Funny, this and the Rust runtime implementation are neck and neck on the frontpage right now. Cool project!
102.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Codex cli is a very performant cli though, better than any other cli code assistant I've used. I mean does it matter what code it's producing? If it renders and functions just use it. I think it's better to take the L on verb
103.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Just use Codex 5.3 in codex cli, the $20/mo plan is basically limitless at least for me and I keep reasoning efforts high. You can enjoy it while it lasts, OpenAI is being very liberal with their limits because of CC eating their lunch
104.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I have a question though, if they don't have access to chats but they find out the enchilada ad was performing the best, something like this can provide enough information to be used to know about peoples private chats. When someone cl
105.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Are em-dashes really that common to use or did I just start noticing them after LLMs became popular for rewriting comments? Not implying your comment is LLM generated, clearly it isn't but asking as a genuine question.
106.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
That's exactly what I meant, when I've used LLMs on mature code bases it does very well because the code base was curated by engineers. When you have a greenfield project it's slop central, it's literally whatever the LL
107.
▲
When AI Helps You Move Fast and Think Less [video]
(youtube.com)
3 points
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
|
0 comments
108.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
This only works if you don't look at the code. If all you're doing is reviewing behaviour and tests then yes almost 100% of the time if you're able to document the problem exact enough codex 5.3 will get it right. I had codex
109.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
How much of this release was made easier with LLMs?
110.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Why didn't your VC friend drop some seed on you back then if the stealth startup was doing 25MM ARR? They probably could've had a better deal with you!
111.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Backups are a PITA I wanted to go exactly this route but even though I had VMs and compute I can't let any production data hit it without bullet proof backups. I setup a cron job to store my backups to object storage but everything fel
112.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I read your comment, then your username. I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS USERNAME WAS CLAIMED 14 DAYS AGO! Good catch!
113.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I feel exactly like OP, I was visiting Ask before actually making my own "Whats the point?" post. I think the real issue is this huge community of people who have gone completely gone awry with using LLMs in their own loops and co
114.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
But that's exactly what you should be doing, technically. Human in the loop is a dead concept, you should never need to understand your code or even know what changes to make. All you should be concerned about is having the best possib
115.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
You were confidently wrong for judging them to be confidently wrong > While EMMA shows great promise, we recognize several of its challenges. EMMA's current limitations in processing long-term video sequences restricts its ability t
116.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
I was going to say "you forgot /s" but realized you're right.
117.
▲
There's no skill in AI coding [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
|
0 comments
118.
▲
by
written-beyond
8mo ago
Oh no I didn't meant a write about the prompting I meant about the actual client you wrote. What was the final framework like, how did the protocols work, etc.
119.
▲
by
written-beyond
9mo ago
I'm fine with opinionated people who have lived in broadly along the socio economic ladder. Atleast their opinions are grounded across a richer experience of life. Rather than just growing up upper middle to wealthy and saying you drop
120.
▲
by
written-beyond
9mo ago
I applaud you sir! You've successfully hacked the collective HN hive mind. I can't go a week without either seeing your post on the frontpage, someone mentioning you, your comment branching into a huge thread or obligatory pelican
More ›