Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
worrycue
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
361.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
Surprisingly, most of them don't, not to the level Microsoft does at least. Can you give an example of another company as mercenary as Microsoft? P.S. The Halloween Documents give a good overview of how Microsoft thinks.
362.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> only so many miles of high-speed rail have positive ROI I heard their rail service is in massive debt too. They overbuild it.
363.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
You replying to the right person?
364.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> Apple not allowing other browsers is a bit much… Apple is paranoid about being dependent on other companies. If Chrome becomes a "must have" Google will have leverage over them by threatening to pull Chrome from the iPhone. T
365.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> just like any other public company Except way more mercenary. Companies compete like boxers in a ring. You win some, you lose some. MS is the boxer who would hit below the belt if no one is looking and will try to main/kill you if
366.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> I predict that the fight will be more about defining intelligence than inventing it. I don't think anyone really cares. What's important is what it can do.
367.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
I wonder if GPT4 “traps” such questions and handles them using non-LLM algorithms. I mean Google already does it for that type of question, e.g. “capital of the irish republic” will return Dublin, Ireland. “Gronk” returns result about some
368.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
I don’t think it’s just a matter of curating data sets for accuracy. The model seem to be able to invent falsehoods on its own based on no data whatsoever - e.g. I read that researchers asked an LLM about a made up biochemist and the LLM ge
369.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
On a separate note, there is a chance this could be futile. The objective of AI like LLMs is to create output indistinguishable from human output, should it reach that stage - generated text have no telltale signs of being AI output - then
370.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
Personally I would file the loudness wars under bad mastering too. Properly mastered CD audio is the near the best audio you can get as a consumer - you have 24 bit 96kHz audio but that's really overkill as the noise floor with 16 bits
371.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
As mentioned I’m not an expert but what kind of distortions can there be in properly mastered 16 bit 44.1kHz PCM? I know there is distortion from quantisation but that’s a solved problem with dithering and noise shaping, no? Clipping is jus
372.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
You should really be more specific. Digital file sound quality can range from crap (<=64kbps MP3) to higher than CD quality (losslessly compressed 24 bit 96kHz audio) - BTW CDs are digital too.
373.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> vinyl is offline, private, and a cherished possession But so are CDs without any of the drawbacks.
374.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> The mixes are optimized to a different set of constraints. From what I heard, a lot of vinyls are just recorded from CD. No source, just a YouTube video a long time ago so take it with a grain of salt. > Because all digital distorti
375.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
Intel has stopped using "nm" - it's meaningless anyway; hasn't been meaningful since 1994 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_device_fabricati... ). Now it's just Intel 7 (currently in
376.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
Digitalise the censored version so we have a copy. Then remove the censorship so we can see the original as intended.
377.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
Are they doing Intel 7+ or something? The only refresh I heard of is the Raptor Lake CPU refresh which will be Intel’s 14th gen CPUs - which might enable some features like the Digital Linear Voltage Regulator (DLVR) that were disabled due
378.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> but not products from the gaming division, that also might cause consumer unrest Some people will complain. Others will just buy a PlayStation. Sony can even "sweeten the deal" by giving discounts on the console and maybe tal
379.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
> their citizens revolt at not being able to buy Windows or Office. The UK will probably allow those to be sold. If MS refuse to sell them, the politicians will just spin it as Microsoft vs the UK and get everyone worked up over “soverei
380.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
To my knowledge, Sony mostly fund the development of games and keep the rights to them - e.g. Demon Souls and Bloodborne were funded by them, they own the rights, and of course they are exclusive to PlayStation; maybe they will appear on PC
381.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
I don’t understand why Microsoft doesn’t build up their exclusive library the way Sony does. Yes, it’s riskier but so what. Sony could do it. Microsoft definitely has the money to do it. Not to mention making former multi-platform franchise
382.
▲
by
worrycue
3y ago
What is he or she not impressed about? Why should we care?
383.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
But if you don’t know what you are doing, you have to worry about its hallucinations slipping pass you.
384.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> What changed is that the willingness to destroy people in war evaporated, and so the ability in theory to conquer a country, and the willingness to do so given the costs it would entail diverged significantly. This might be particular
385.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Their fabs would be instantly destroyed in the invasion. If China’s attacks don’t destroy them, the US will to avoid the tech entering China’s hands. Frankly, the whole idea that the US is only defending Taiwan because of TSMC is ridiculous
386.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
I read it could also be volume. Higher volume means more data to learn from.
387.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Seems people have different opinions on what’s acceptable. Many people seem quite happy with ChatGPT despite its tendency to hallucinate with no warning of any kind. Then there are people like me who feel that its unreliability significantl
388.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> (including Google itself!) Bet Google won’t make that mistake again, i.e. it won’t publish as much and will be much more careful about what it publishes, least they give a competitor a useful tool and get nothing in return - when the c
389.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
> When ChatGPT tells me something, I have no idea if it's paraphrasing information gathered from Encyclopedia Britannica, or from a hollow-earther forum. Or it's something it just hallucinated out of thin air.
390.
▲
by
worrycue
4y ago
Doesn't mean much though. A shut-in can usually handle occasionally leaving the house. I wonder if they have to spend the money in person too. It's all moot if they spend it all via ordering on the internet and paying cash on deli
More ›