worried4future

5 ms·

31.
by worried4future 4y ago
When I visited it, some time ago, it mostly seemed like a lot of angsty teens shitposting. My thoroughly unscientific analysis of the situation seemed like it was about 98% bullshit posts and maybe 2% of the posts I found truly objectionabl
32.
by worried4future 4y ago
> America has a damn hard time appreciating the aesthetics of the human body in a comfortable and unproblematic manner, and the pressure to keep PornHub hidden in the shadows reinforces the negative feedback loop of unhealthy perspective
33.
by worried4future 4y ago
> The Washington Post is not encouraging their readers to harass or doxx individuals or groups Publishing libsoftiktok's information was definitely intended to harass them, and implicit support for doxxing. > Would you support Cl
34.
by worried4future 4y ago
> larger technology community) used to care a lot about free speech, but they've completely abandoned that principle I agree and I'm very worried for it.
35.
by worried4future 4y ago
Notice as soon as you bring this up, they stop replying. Those comments are really awful and wtf upvoted....
36.
by worried4future 4y ago
I don't think we should target, harass and doxx people, therefore I do not do those things. That doesn't mean that I think we should censor entire websites because they are sometimes used as platforms to do those kinds of things.
37.
by worried4future 4y ago
It's a cult. While I agree with you I don't think it's particularly worse in k8/CNCF than in other parts of tech.
38.
by worried4future 5y ago
I 100% agree w/r/t the CP argument (I basically posted the same thing at the same time, lol) but the Nazi/Holocaust one I'm not as sure about honestly. I think, in post-war Germany, that type of censorship had a role and
39.
by worried4future 5y ago
You are correct and I believe that it therefore falls on government to effectively manage that situation. Youtube is basically a monopoly and without trying to debate the ethics or correctness of how they got there, the message should be th
40.
by worried4future 5y ago
Child pornography isn't censored inherently. Child pornography isn't allowed because we believe that pornography requires consent of the involved parties and children are inherently incapable of consenting.