Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wjnc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
wjnc
2mo ago
I see the resemblance to what AI generates, and wow some of those works are painfully detailed. I don’t think it’s just training. His work I is what I would describe as somewhat middle of the road Fantasy / SciFi Pop art. The deviant a
32.
▲
by
wjnc
2mo ago
Can be true at the same time when dealing with high leverage and a growing fund. The YTD doesn’t make you more liquid or secure.
33.
▲
by
wjnc
2mo ago
In the category of private victories without any economic use (any hobby costs you something): I store boxes for LED lights with receipts. Write on the box where you put the light and chug it in the garage. I have not failed to get a new on
34.
▲
by
wjnc
2mo ago
You're right. Those are 2999.99 according to their site. According to the Wayback Machine they've been priced that way since at least 2024 [1] [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20240111120913/https:/&#
35.
▲
by
wjnc
2mo ago
Register a complaint with the creditcard company with proof of last years $38, the auto renew message with price of $38 and the amount they put on your card. Pretty clear and cut? You can’t offer X and then take Y. It’s Hovers problem what
36.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
Don’t wait for the right equipment to start writing, _but_ there is a little joy in just splashing a little on a nice pen and nice paper. A few decades in life and I’ve assembled a set of multiple fountain pens, in different colours and siz
37.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
Thanks to the comment above I discovered Games on Whales and just read up on the possibilities. Isn’t that exactly your usecase? It seems you can stream to multiple underpowered systems provided you have network, RAM, GPU and enough cores.
38.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
This is US ToS probably? Under GDPR we have no punitive damages, no broad discovery, and the CJEU has kept non-material damage awards modest. So we can sue, but can’t win greatly thus cannot invest greatly in lawyers. Our supervisors are un
39.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
The owner of starlink is planning to be the only remaining capitalist. UBI is not for the US, a return to indentured servitude is.
40.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
Like your thoughts! And then mastery is being able to play things exactly the same. But with mastery comes another way for humans to recognize each other. Specific sounds to specific masters (or movements, techniques for say sports). Each m
41.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
Put on the hats of a risk manager or supply chain manager. Yes, that would have mattered. What you insource today, you can repeat tomorrow. If you know the price of an input will multiply in the near future, you should at least develop proc
42.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
What they can’t see, they can’t tax. Window taxes and resulting changes in architecture are a nice historic example.
43.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
Look, I share your sentiment. But, I can relate to the C-squad though. Going squarely against the market sentiment is not the way to gain and keep confidence. And everyone is vibing right? So they are probably thinking something like: as lo
44.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
No need for the downvotes imho. Can’t speak for u/noduerme but in putting outsourcing (labor, LLM/AI) in the same basket I don’t see a category mistake, but a dry way of looking at business. What are the risks, what are the reward
45.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
I’m in Finance and learned pretty quickly that to point out the implicit future cost raises based on the cost the LLM-providers need to recoup was unpopular at best (STFU better describes the situation). Running full force into a bear trap.
46.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
I enjoy risk seeking behavior as well as the next guy, but lets please be adults and make this opt-in, not opt-out. If you get the LLM to ask the right questions, (for me) obviously you would want it to wait for an answer?
47.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
Economically, you would probably be the only customer (stated willingness to pay can differ from market outcome ;) paying that amount. Your stated willingness to pay has little relation to the true value of our data and digital sovereignty
48.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
Incomprehensible! “Didn’t quite get his leg over” - that’s the joke? Found a Guardian article and even they do not explain the joke [1]. Further ethnological research [2] explains it all - “to get a leg over” is intercourse. The story about
49.
▲
by
wjnc
3mo ago
I think you are right but would like to keep in consideration that penalty clauses are real and can be enforced in court. We have no (or perhaps: have some) clue how far the bargaining power is leaning toward the suppliers. Maybe the signat
50.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
You are right. Toxic workplaces are abundant. But non toxic I hope as well. I am always interested in how we can or cannot transfer local cultural differences and things we hold as basic truths via a forum. The second question: yes, in a ti
51.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
(Won’t fully repeat my other post.) Shame is such a big word. ‘Give people the chance to _teach_’ would be my reply. Which you probably would see as even more vicious, but it’s 100% sincere. As a junior I made the front page of national new
52.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
“Shame” is a big word. I wouldn’t shame a member of my team. Why would I!? They are great people. Same with “blame”. Everyone faults, everyone can be blamed something. That doesn’t change the basics of a person. Giving people a chance to di
53.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
Yeah, this is a part about itsec I don’t understand in my firm. They run social engineering tests, but never notify management when individuals fail, only in general terms. While being psyopped needs to be activelly discussed among coworker
54.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
He bought a house with < 1% of his net worth, which he made himself. Then proceeds to give away 100x that. Aristotle would call that modest and of a balancend demeanor. An absence of excess indeed. I would be living in a cardboard box wi
55.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
This is a UI/UX problem, no? While the current suppliers are mostly locked in the ‘chat for everything’ mode. Guess what, we didn’t go to the moon in chat mode, we don’t drive cars via chat and cyborgs don’t play chess that way. Domain
56.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
Am I reading you right that breaking power (that you want to regenerate in the system) >> speeding power? Obvious now I come to think of it, and still pretty nifty new thing learned if true!
57.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
In that analogy bigtech AI is currently investing in cleaner air for all of us? We _could_ breath it through their hose, but might as well breath it outside.
58.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
I stubbed my toe. I don’t feel like ice cream today.
59.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
I found them worth reading for the following set of thoughts came up: - programmers had problems with delivering quality long before LLM’s - very much research and tools went into that, bringing us {Git, libraries, VSCode, reviews, …,} but
60.
▲
by
wjnc
4mo ago
If you care to explain why, I’m interested. I imagine a situation where large Sum X is in ETF but gets adapted by a few little shorts. It’s still mainly the ETF in the portfolio. (Exactly this is why in my firm some ETFs are deemed too prec
More ›