with

6 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by with 9mo ago

   true, it's fit for a marketing strategy for an unauthorized protocol that is now being turned into a startup I guess
2. 62.▲
   by with 9mo ago

   the public internet is already full of garbage. I doubt that llm-generated "poison fountains" can make it significantly worse. if the AI bubble pops, it won't be due to poison fountains, it will be because ROIs never material
3. 63.▲
   by with 9mo ago

   spending more than 4 hours building this ... is a choice
4. 64.▲
   by with 9mo ago

   I think there are issues with Anthropic (and their ToS); however, banning the "harnesses" is justified. If you're relying on scraping a web UI or reverse-engineering private APIs to bypass per-token costs, it's just VC s
5. 65.▲
   by with 9mo ago

   Filing an ITU submission is one thing, now they need to make reliable, reusable heavy-lift spacecraft. Probably 5-10 years out tbh. They're just squatting on approvals.
6. 66.▲
   by with 1y ago

   Spot on. Anyone hyping this up as some huge leap is just lying to themselves.
7. 67.▲
   by with 1y ago

   pretty cool idea. using stagehand under the hood?
8. 68.▲
   by with 1y ago

   It’s a widely accepted eval technique and it’s called “llm as a judge”