wiseowise

5 ms·

31.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
[flagged]
32.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> If anyone deserves some f-bombs, it's them. Why? Because they do a thing differently from you? I don't see any harm in that, unless they're an obvious grifter. I certainly do see harm in fucking gatekeepers telling other
33.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> What's with the abuse? Is that the hallmark of a great writer as well? Fuck this, fuck that. Pathetic. This many times. A great reader, who reads 52 books a year, and a writer has to resort to cringy "fuck you" to convey
34.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
You will be long dead before that happens.
35.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> And I don't get it. Money, audience, attention, building a community around your ideas, pushing agenda, there are thousands of reasons why someone can like to do X without doing Y. And the one that trumps them all: they just feel
36.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
Wow, started really well, and then devolved into a mix of rambling, shaming people's usage of time, romanticizing reading, AI, social networks, and no true scotsman. Classy.
37.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> Textual Please, don't. One of the main benefits of TUI is being able to freely copy text, I hate opening Textual application and being dropped into this canvas like state.
38.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> TUIs don't need to follow any OS guidelines, cross-platform GUIs always look bad outside of the "main" platform. So because TUIs look universally bad, they're better than cross-platform GUI?
39.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
There are many things in life that are “not wrong”, doesn’t mean you have to scar kids for life with this shit.
40.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
But what about <some obscure feature that you use once in a blue moon and could’ve been achieved using some CLI faster than you could remember an IntelliJ shortcut for it>! It’s an IDE, not an editor!
41.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
And here I thought they’re finally rewriting their slow, bloated IDEs. Shame.
42.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
Beautiful theme. Author has style.
43.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> You don't have to suffer, you can just buy a different platform. Android has had alternate stores for decades. Because the only difference between Apple and Android crap is only software, of course? I won't fit into the messa
44.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> We saw how developers used that "freedom" - now all almost all software runs in a remote server and is delivered through a sandbox (and even then developers try as hard as possible to poison that as well). Evil developers for
45.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
There’s a whole layer of VPs banging their head against the wall 24/7 on how to make it possible, don’t worry.
46.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> All in all, still extremely anti-consumer. If I can download and run arbitrary code on my Mac--even if I have to jump through scary warnings--why should I not be able to do so on my phone? Don’t worry. They’re working really hard to fi
47.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
This was a great, old anecdote. Until they’ve started the biggest European war of the century.
48.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
Not by a single lunatic operating from their bedroom.
49.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
FILTER BY Publish date:<2024
50.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
Disgruntled AI won’t kick your teeth in, yet.
51.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
https://building.nubank.com/scaling-with-flutter/ https://flutter.dev/showcase/nubank
52.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> It’s actually much easier to build a performant macOS app with flutter than with SwiftUI. Got any case studies?
53.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
Only because it was cheaper to migrate Android to Kotlin instead of Dart. JetBrains needs Google more than Google needs JetBrains.
54.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> We are actively working toward enabling WebAssembly (Wasm) by default for Flutter web applications, bringing native-like performance to the browser. lol.
55.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
> Like what other profession markets themselves as "Hey, our job is so easy that any schmuck off the street can enter the career with 4 months of training." Any profession with scammers, con artists, and snake-oil sellers?
56.
by wiseowise 2mo ago
There’s no obsession. It’s an obvious, ugly slop.
57.
by wiseowise 3mo ago
> Do you do all your arithmetic by hand, or do you insist on using this archaic thing called "brain"? I don't need calculator to know that arithmetic exists and what it is.
58.
by wiseowise 3mo ago
> Yeah, and the deaf lady can't answer a single thing without her interpreter. Deaf lady is missing her hearing and therefore requires hearing aids to hear, so following your logic Rachel is missing her thinking therefore she requir
59.
by wiseowise 3mo ago
> Bloomberg Terminal Is Ugly and Clunky What, not enough white space, animations, and shitty, obscure menus for you? Or maybe they need Material 69 or Liquid Glass?
60.
by wiseowise 3mo ago
She can’t answer a single thing without opening her laptop.

More ›