windows_tips

14 ms·

91.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Yes, but the incentives improved equally.
92.
by windows_tips 8y ago
If it were self-evident, it would not need to be stated. Imagine the game monopoly. Then, imagine a house rule that says all players receive $300 at the start of each turn.
93.
by windows_tips 8y ago
>Inequality of outcomes is a requirement for incentives to improve. What proof do you use?
94.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Maybe a servant's hallway?
95.
by windows_tips 8y ago
There are probably higher dose formulations. The key here, though, is that formulation contains THC (and extracts from other plants) and is derived from marijuana cannabis plants, instead of just hemp-derived CBD.
96.
by windows_tips 8y ago
The "null" hypothesis would typically be that "there is no effect". All that you can really do is prove it wrong, by measuring an effect when there "should", by the hypothesis, be none. Due to what is known as
97.
by windows_tips 8y ago
What type would you like? Do you think doctors would recommend such products and patients would continue to buy such products if they didn't work/help?
98.
by windows_tips 8y ago
>You could probably write software while on CBD. It is possible to write software on CBD, THC, and others.
99.
by windows_tips 8y ago
It's not completely different. They appear to be identical in large portion. Check the diagrams at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6630507B1/en
100.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Absorption through the mouth skips a large portion of the digestive system.
101.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Get a salve made with cannabis and other plants. Something like: http://www.papaandbarkley.com/product/releaf-balm/
102.
by windows_tips 8y ago
>The drug is illegal, Only in certain contexts (ie. some instances of interstate commerce).
103.
by windows_tips 8y ago
One could still think it, but regret that they said it aloud/sent it as a text message, such that others heard/read it.
104.
by windows_tips 8y ago
I think you can go even farther, to, "intentionally malicious". Mark hasn't taken back his comments about his users being "dumb fucks" for "trust[ing]" him, as far as I know , although he has apparently sa
105.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Seems like if your bot can or could meet the expectations of the challenge(s) the contest is open to you. I'd be wary of signing anything to compete though.
106.
by windows_tips 8y ago
I don't know if they are better off or not, but several years, at least, is what I thought of when I read the original poster refer to "long term". I do not consider 8 weeks to be "long term".
107.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Maybe the people who wanted them got their way, sometimes.
108.
by windows_tips 8y ago
That's not a long-term study. It's a one-off 'meta-analysis'.
109.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Running small pods underneath roads doesn't seem like it would really increase throughput much at all, while being significantly harder to build and maintain than the area directly above it.
110.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Is someone inferring causation? From the title, we can at least conclude that "therapy" did not "prevent" measured negative changes.
111.
by windows_tips 8y ago
I'm not sure if you are playing or just didn't read the law very carefully, but disturbance of remains is not prohibited by what you linked. >wantonly disturbs
112.
by windows_tips 8y ago
There is a "HIPPA"[0] law that is often referenced in the US when seeking medical services. Presumably it really only applies to interstate insurers, but is often believed to "protect" some information from being shared
113.
by windows_tips 8y ago
I highly doubt California has such a law. It would not be constitutional[0] if it did: >SEC. 2. (a) Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. A
114.
by windows_tips 8y ago
If Peggy has to use the password since recieving the email, vimeo could put bounds on the password length, at least.
115.
by windows_tips 8y ago
"Don't urinate on your pillow."?
116.
by windows_tips 8y ago
>Right are a completely arbitrary construction of organized society so it's strange to suggest there are any absolute rules that govern 'rights.' Are you familiar with the United States Declaration of Independence [0]? &gt
117.
by windows_tips 8y ago
npm is distributing this credential tracker?
118.
by windows_tips 8y ago
After a person dies, they don't exist. It is counterfactual to posit that they have 'rights'.
119.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Why do you think she "surely wrote messages to people that she didn't want to share with her parents"? Seems like a pretty big assumption. >On the other hand, it's their daughter's privacy. No, the daughter is de
120.
by windows_tips 8y ago
Email is a plaintext protocol, so having a number in an email really just means that you saw the email, not that you know Peggy's password.

More ›