willy_k

21 ms·

331.
by willy_k 3y ago
If you’re going to try to determine how China is approaching nuclear power, it’s probably more useful to look at data related to that [0], instead of drawing conclusions from tangential data. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wik
332.
by willy_k 3y ago
Not sure what you were feeling bad about, but it’s also directly from the readme, so OP just saw something cool on GitHub and posted it along with a comment with the project’s own description, which is pretty standard on HN (I think, that’s
333.
by willy_k 3y ago
What’s the disease? Is it the body’s down-regulation of opioid receptors? If so, then you’re right. But if it also includes the impact of an active opioid addiction on one’s lifestyle, methadone clinics help treat that, which in turn makes
334.
by willy_k 3y ago
Yeah my bad, it originally had a comment on the multiple jokes seeming to mock a valid claim, though I now get that those were mostly in response to the broadness of “food”.
335.
by willy_k 3y ago
Ultra processed foods, which are a large part of many people’s diets, definitely cause cancer[0]. [0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37087831/
336.
by willy_k 3y ago
> And remember - we did have a long experiment with legally prescribed opioids, and their widespread availability contributed to the current addiction crisis. Well yeah, when you have criminally-encouraged over prescription of highly add
337.
by willy_k 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38602914
338.
by willy_k 3y ago
You’ve definitely described an invasion of privacy, just not one perpetrated by HN.
339.
by willy_k 3y ago
Don’t you think it’s disingenuous to reduce “law breakers” to those people?
340.
by willy_k 3y ago
Maybe I’m missing the importance of this happening in this experiment specifically, but isn’t this already a known phenomena seen in the double-slit experiment?
341.
by willy_k 3y ago
They created a product that solves the problem of people not watching ads compulsively, and sold access to that product to people with ads.
342.
by willy_k 3y ago
If they weren’t implying that, the statement was redundant.
343.
by willy_k 3y ago
I think this is largely unique to ChatGPT though, not LLMs at large. OpenAI has done a lot of fine tuning to create a specific product, which is a chatbot, not an LLM that mimics human speech.
344.
by willy_k 3y ago
Who’s claiming it’s not significantly harder? That is a bad reason to give up, if that’s what you’re advocating for.
345.
by willy_k 3y ago
I agree. My initial comment was just saying that people will not want another old president, with the exception of convinced trump voters.
346.
by willy_k 3y ago
What? If you mean Trump, I think it’s pretty dishonest or at best ignorant to liken them to each other. He absolutely has his flaws, tons of them, but categorically excluding him from the discussion isn’t justified.
347.
by willy_k 3y ago
Unfortunately, there’s only one candidate over 70 with a real chance.
348.
by willy_k 3y ago
The sole purpose of my comment was to state in a comment the information from the link that’s relevant to this discussion, which is what the new part of the patent, which I understand to be the cooling system. I know nothing about patent la
349.
by willy_k 3y ago
Good for you. Are you in denial?
350.
by willy_k 3y ago
Yes, but you were also saying that it would be that way in 5 years, and if you look at the cases for which these tools were practical at the start of 2023 compared to the practical applications now, not even a full year of progress, the rel
351.
by willy_k 3y ago
The patent describes an “Electric Vehicle With Modular Removable Auxiliary Battery With Integrated Cooling”.
352.
by willy_k 3y ago
I don’t know much about the space, but couldn’t LoRA be used to (moderately) efficiently use a relevant and individual fine-tuned model alongside a general LLM?
353.
by willy_k 3y ago
They definitely are in terms of energy efficiency
354.
by willy_k 3y ago
Yes but no, none of that really describes current development.
355.
by willy_k 3y ago
A lot, but how many people will start with the latter but find themselves (capable of) doing the former?
356.
by willy_k 3y ago
I might be wrong but I think they’re suggesting you start with GPT-4, which as you’ve said is already somewhat knowledgeable, and then either fine tune with or otherwise integrate your law db.
357.
by willy_k 3y ago
Yes, right now, until it gets a bit better and learns and integrates the expertise for that and every other field.
358.
by willy_k 3y ago
There are also people who do it because they find it interesting, or spiritual, or healing in some way. They aren’t really ‘fun’, and are generally not addictive, though ones with dopaminergic activity like lsd or to a larger extent MDMA do
359.
by willy_k 3y ago
https://faq.usps.com/s/article/What-is-General-Delivery
360.
by willy_k 3y ago
Can’t tell if you mean this literally or not. I doubt this video had any significant influence the blurb.

More ›