willsmith72

6 ms·

61.
by willsmith72 4mo ago
I don't see it as a ladder at all, unless you claim Anthropic built their own models by training off of other closed frontier models, violating those models' ToS
62.
by willsmith72 4mo ago
also curious. On the claude code $200 plan, get close to weekly limits but don't usually hit it. to me just about any small reduction in performance would not be acceptable, the cost of redirecting and getting stuck during long runs wi
63.
by willsmith72 4mo ago
so.. optimistic ui? like upvotes on hacker news since forever?
64.
by willsmith72 4mo ago
this is disgusting corruption, a direct wealth transfer from the many to the few. shame on everyone involved
65.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
aren't you conflating being 10x as smart with code that is 10x more complicated? the relationship should be the opposite, the smartest people can write the most readable solutions
66.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
anyone else's claude code (native install) not able to update to 2.1.154 to get 4.8? edit: nvm was just my library network
67.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
can we stop throwing around the term "profitable"? didn't they say "operating profit"? so so different to actually making a profit
68.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
i agree. but the parent was talking about share price. my point is exactly that "a profit perspective and revenue for shareholders" i.e. driving the share price up. if that's not the goal great, i would love if more companies
69.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
that's fine, to me it should be fine for companies to exist like that but it doesn't match the archetype of a "growth" company. to the commenters talking about the share price, if you want a consistently growing stock, t
70.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
the knock on them is exactly that, 20 years later they're just a file storage saas. the idea was they must be able to expand the surface area over time
71.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
thank you!! missed the public launch
72.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
wow thanks. I saw the initial announcement when it was still in private beta, but have been less online lately and missed the public launch. Awesome!!
73.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
Yep I made the switch a couple of years ago for all of my projects and never looked back. Workers, D1, R2, queues, containers, KV Still using AWS for email sending so that will be great when it comes
74.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
There's feature flags then there's staged rollouts gated by multiple variables with statistical analysis
75.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
to be fair, even though they have "working backwards" and "customer obsession", amazon has always been about making lots of different experimental bets. Bezos: > To invent you have to experiment, and if you know in ad
76.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
Let's not make air travel the customer experience bar for anything please
77.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
People often build their career skills on proprietary tech. Photoshop, Figma, Java, AWS architects
78.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
at what volume is the membership worth it? 4 shops/year I wouldn't have thought would justify the cost
79.
by willsmith72 5mo ago
what does it say when you feed it a real Mickens article? (a recent one not in the training set) i wouldn't be too impressed at n of 1
80.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
> If it’s $220 worth of value for $200 - I get it. Wrong comparison. If a competitor gives you $230 of value for $200, of course you shouldn't pick the $220 one
81.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
But that's just paying per use right, not with the subscription which is way better value
82.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
it's an SMB, if you need redundancy on every 3rd party dependency your business will die anyway better to take the risk for most things. if the worst case happens and you have to migrate, you migrate. otherwise you risk overengineering
83.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
You must be crawling on your bike I'd love to see that
84.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
Wait Kim and Selena are irrelevant? I guess I'm not keeping up with the times
85.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
Wow so that's why you did #2? The explanation in the CLI is really not clear. I thought it was just a suggestion to compact, no idea it was way more expensive than if I hadn't left it idle for an hour. You guys really need to comm
86.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
Being "more" open than something totally closed doesn't make you open. The name is still bs
87.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
That's such a poor way to communicate a number. I take it they mean an increase of up to 35%?
88.
by willsmith72 6mo ago
yeah they all suck at ui. have you given it a feedback loop? update code, screenshot, read image repeat etc. that's the best i've found as long as tokens aren't a concern
89.
by willsmith72 8mo ago
this sounds... really slow. for large changes for sure i'm investing time into planning. but such a rigid system can't possible be as good as a flexible approach with variable amounts of planning based on complexity
90.
by willsmith72 8mo ago
this doesn't add up. the 20k is in API costs. people talk about CC losing money because it's way more efficient than the API. I.e. the same work with efficient use of CC might have cost ~$5k. but regardless, hiring is difficult an

More ›