willismichael

34 ms·

1. 391.▲
   by willismichael 14y ago

   Now I'm genuinely curious - in which direction are you trying to hack undecideds?
2. 392.▲
   by willismichael 14y ago

   Could you clarify what you mean by "most pure object oriented language"? This seems disingenuous to me, since if you ask the users of a dozen different OO languages what "OO" means, you'll get a dozen different answers. http://www.paulgra
3. 393.▲
   by willismichael 14y ago

   Now I want to take the Cognitive Reflection Test, but I'm afraid that just knowing what it is will unfairly alter the way that I go about taking it.
4. 394.▲
   by willismichael 14y ago

   I recently worked on some client code that interacts with the ReviewBoard API: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/webapi/ I won't claim to be a REST expert by any means, but this API is one of the best examples of "Real REST" that
5. 395.▲
   by willismichael 14y ago

   > 18. Find someone else's code that does amazing things but is unintelligible. Refactor it. Then throw it away Throw away the unintelligible code, or throw away the refactor?
6. 396.▲
   by willismichael 14y ago

   I didn't see anywhere to comment on your blog, but after reading part 2 I had a idea about solving the inventory-select problem. What if instead of the UI "returning a value", it instead has a property that is a function describing what to