will_pseudonym

103 ms·

1. 481.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   I absolutely agree with "focus on what you can do." I think that we can also engage in the conversation as a community and network, which of course you are doing. The main thing that stuck out to me about your post was "low r
2. 482.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   What about the chilling effect? People change their behaviors when they know they're being watched. It goes completely against the spirit of the US Constitution. How can I pursue happiness if I'm worried that what I write will be
3. 483.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   Yes, but before it tripled in price, it actually lost almost half its value. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_public_offering_of_Fac...
4. 484.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   Facebook was a great example of this pattern. EDIT: See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_public_offering_of_Fac... . It lost about half of its value before it started its ascension to today's valuation.
5. 485.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   Except governments are supposed to be accountable to their constituents. Had the government been transparent about what they were doing, there would be no need to blow the whistle in the first place, creating the need for Snowden to collect
6. 486.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   The ironic part is that the people who rail against Snowden in grabbing "everything" instead of only the "bad, important stuff" is exactly what Snowden is demonstrating that the government is doing! If they hate what Sno
7. 487.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   Wow, I have never seen that before. Thank you!!!!
8. 488.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   I am so sorry about that! I misread and thought it was US-specific.
9. 489.▲
   by will_pseudonym 11y ago

   There is nothing to gain by telling the police anything. If it's beneficial to your case, tell your lawyer. Don't talk to police! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
10. 490.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    Please write that post!!! I would LOVE to read it! I am sure thousands of other people would too!
11. 491.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    I had trouble opening this link on mobile. Here's the Google search link to get around the paywall that I encountered: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&c...
12. 492.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    What do you mean by "characterize me as soft"?
13. 493.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    This looks to be the newest, most powerful out of the group: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B012YUJJM8/ Here's the full set of products: http://www.ianker.com/Solar-Chargers/catego
14. 494.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    Benson is doing God's work. Because of him I was able to purchase a USB-C to USB-A cable (the iOrange cable he reviewed), and I learned that Google's own marketing materials were functionally incorrect, which led users to expect 3
15. 495.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    Another way to look at it would be that the difference opens opportunities to improve the self-taught path.
16. 496.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    "There are two types of people in this world. People who divide the world into two types, and those who don't."
17. 497.▲
    by will_pseudonym 11y ago

    As someone who is constantly baffled at many UX choices made by the makers of nearly every piece of software I use, I like the idea a lot. I'm looking forward to using the service. And I do have a small couple critique of an aspect of