wilg

13 ms·

331.
by wilg 1y ago
How many times can we read the same article and have the same discussion? If AI is not useful, people will not use the product or feature and it will die. If it is useful, people will use it.
332.
by wilg 1y ago
There's simply no technical solution to authenticating photographs as far as I can tell. The only real solution I can think of is just to have multiple independent parties photograph the same event and use social trust. Luckily this s
333.
by wilg 1y ago
It's interesting that no one in this thread seems to use ChatGPT particularly deeply to understand why this is useful. I think this is very interesting, I don't particularly love Chrome, so a version of Chrome that more deeply int
334.
by wilg 1y ago
This is exactly the right move to find out what products people find useful on top of their AI infrastructure.
335.
by wilg 1y ago
Is this true?
336.
by wilg 1y ago
I do not care what anyone thinks the definition is, nor should you.
337.
by wilg 1y ago
Well, except he directly caused the debt to go up, and killed hundreds of thousands of people, while being really awful to everyone. I know it is tempting to think this isn't true if you're in an info bubble, but unfortunately it
338.
by wilg 1y ago
Arguing about the definitions of words is rarely useful.
339.
by wilg 1y ago
I recommend leaving it on the default settings. It's fine after a while, and I like a lot of the simplification. But I would rather they function on making their software actually work or be good, even if I like playing with the refrac
340.
by wilg 1y ago
Dan O'Dowd is not really a very trustworthy source about exactly what happened in this clip.
341.
by wilg 1y ago
Seems like he's misreading a reply to this tweet which was clearly a joke.
342.
by wilg 1y ago
Fundamentally, the issue is that only a small number of people know what free/"libre" software is, and only a small subset of those people think it is a good tradeoff. For that reason alone, there's just not going to be
343.
by wilg 1y ago
Not sure what to tell you, if there's a problem you have to speak up.
344.
by wilg 1y ago
If that's true, all you have to do is convince other people that it's true and they can just vote for someone to deploy that money. Don't need to wait for someone else to do it.
345.
by wilg 1y ago
Yeah two unpopular wars he did not start and spent a lot of effort figuring out how to get out of. He ended one and his vice president later ended the other.
346.
by wilg 1y ago
It's very important to realize that it isn't true that DOGE didn't "do much". It's just that what they did was kill hundreds of thousands to millions of people worldwide.
347.
by wilg 1y ago
Of course that's the answer, it's just people don't want to do that.
348.
by wilg 1y ago
This performance issue aside, which I haven’t noticed, a friend recently commented about the quality of Apple’s native apps that he would strongly prefer an Electron app for all of them because it’s a sign that they might actually work in a
349.
by wilg 1y ago
I don't understand the threat model of this for most Unity games on PC, it doesn't seem like there's anything you could do by running arbitrary code inside the Unity player that you couldn't already run on your PC direct
350.
by wilg 1y ago
I'm not sure the summoning of "capitalism" adds much here (and detracts a lot).
351.
by wilg 1y ago
Education would give you the tools to find out whether this is true or not. (It isn't.)
352.
by wilg 1y ago
Skill issue: just measure whatever you are worried about.
353.
by wilg 1y ago
That should still show up in this data though.
354.
by wilg 1y ago
Incredibly, my point was none of those, as you well know!
355.
by wilg 1y ago
While I'm glad you had fun crafting an annoying reply, that's not analogous to what I said.
356.
by wilg 1y ago
That's not what I'm saying, I'm saying many technologies enable a slide into fascism, and not having AI until a couple years ago didn't seem to solve the problem.
357.
by wilg 1y ago
True, but our old technology like radios has been doing that for a long time too.
358.
by wilg 1y ago
Luckily LLMs can also comprehend code (and are getting better at doing so), this problem will probably solve itself with more LLMs. (Don't shoot the messenger!)
359.
by wilg 1y ago
Who cares about the blame, it would just be useful if the tools were better at this task in many particular ways.
360.
by wilg 1y ago
I don’t think so?

More ›