Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
whymauri
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
74 ms
·
931.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
I'm sorry, did anyone mention quantum effects..?
932.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
I'm sorry, but they kinda said nothing about speed or size. >predominantly analog signals, that don't have any sort of equivalent silicon basis. They said the computing units we use on silicon are, at a fundamental level, compl
933.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
Very cool. I think the more open and available this technology is, the quicker we'll be able to optimize and iterate on it. I'm hoping the price of current generation prostheses plummet over the next decade as a result.
934.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
That makes a lot of sense, this is an interesting perspective.
935.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
Could it be a pre-emptive political move to avoid scrutiny from governments where the content that was streamed (Christchurch shooting, some illegal pornography) is illegal? Also, I'm pretty sure they know some of the perpetrators but
936.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
My favorite interviews are the ones that have pushed me to the edge of my knowledge and had me derive things that were completely new to me. I love interviews that are genuinely enlightening, which is the opposite of regurgitating Leetcode.
937.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
Huh? Lego makes billions of pieces a year, disposability or not.
938.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
Gotcha, I see the problem now.
939.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
I'm not a mobile dev, but aren't there utilities like KeyStore for this? https://developer.android.com/training/articles/keystore.htm...
940.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
This is basically what happened when Reddit banned racist subreddits. Everyone cried "But my free speech!" "Won't they just polarize even harder?" "Won't they just operate in the ShAdOwS?" Except that
941.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
This is outdated information. He was losing subscribers because the bulk of his subscriptions in 2018 came from Amazon Prime, which were (maybe still are?) not automatically renewable. His numbers peaked after a stream with Drake in March o
942.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
The news office writes the press release not the co-authors or research group, but yeah it kinda sucks. They get a proper shout-out in the third paragraph. Should have really just been written that way in the sub-headline and introduction.
943.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
Yeah, but the difference here is that exposure can also come from negative and contrarian attention. So the dominant strategy for staying at the top of a board is sometimes to be as controversial as possible. Basically, trolling. From a met
944.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
He used a customized version of the PageRank algorithm that comes with MATLAB. The paper is pretty dense with other interesting observations. I think one of the novel contributions is experimental evidence that centrality is important to le
945.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
There's a lot of discussion I see about PageRank for CS purposes, so I'd like to give a slightly different perspective most people haven't heard about. A colleague of mine at CalTech recently used the PageRank Algorithm to mo
946.
▲
by
whymauri
7y ago
Absolutely this! "Now this is a matrix you wouldn't want to meet in a dark alley!" - Gil
947.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
Phrased like this, I agree with you. I didn't think about it like that. I agree with the poster below. Outside of classes, lecture notes, the books I listed, and Sutton/Barto (Intro. to Reinforcement Learning) have taught me the m
948.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
This is pretty harsh. I use Goodfellow as a reference text and then supplement the mathematics behind it with more comprehensive texts like Hastie or Wasserman. Maybe if you sit down and read it cover-to-cover, it will seem disjointed. But
949.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
I feel your frustration, but you answered your own question(s) above. Sometimes people just struggle to write succinctly and clearly. If you feel particularly strongly about this, politely written feedback on the author's comment secti
950.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
Yes, they tried disclosing to officials. Not the ambassador. You're inserting your own interpretation, while I am curious about the intentions of the parent comment. I was assuming no ill-will, by the way.
951.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
I said that I hoped I was reading this wrong, so I'd posit that I was simply asking a question.
952.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
Seems kinda harsh. A giant glowing ball traveling insanely fast in the sky is a very bizarre event and it's reasonable for people to get a little scared.
953.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
This seems to be a bug. I downloaded the raw data from here http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/#read "Chapter 2: Online Data" Also here: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/
954.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
Define 'use'. If 'use' is getting clickbaited through Google images, then the metric is useless. I can't find demographic data but I'd be super interested in that. I'm Hispanic and have only met a single H
955.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
Does your company not have productivity rooms/spaces? I've found that to be the happy middle between completely open and closed-office for me. Though I do agree I was significantly more productive at companies where I had my own o
956.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
Sorry, the tone seemed accusatory in your original post. As if the US and Europe were somehow morally above poaching, but I understand that is not the intention.
957.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
Why is this relevant?
958.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
You may want to justify why it is "bad science" and write a letter to the editor of Nature and Nature Protocols. Is the media interpretation of these studies misguided? Sure, but the popular science media is not doing the science
959.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
The New Zealand video is orders of magnitude more viscerally graphic than the famous videos of the planes flying into the towers. This is not to say one is more tragic than the other, just that the video for the NZ shooting may be one of th
960.
▲
by
whymauri
8y ago
You're just pulling a No True Scotsman. I'm surprised someone replied to you in good faith.
More ›