Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
whimsicalism
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
whimsicalism
2mo ago
How do they stop providers (like Amazon, etc.) from detecting and blocking these agents if they are running on cloud? I know that openai wasn't able to avoid this which is why they moved to 'computer use' on your local machin
62.
▲
by
whimsicalism
2mo ago
Sorry Chris, love you but will not use a closed language.
63.
▲
by
whimsicalism
2mo ago
did the SSL cert expire? i'm getting a big scary warning about this blog
64.
▲
by
whimsicalism
2mo ago
I think the path of least resistance will end up being the cheapest and that is scaling up the parameters a ridiculous amount until you get highly capable models that can develop/distill/design the RAM efficient models. Going stra
65.
▲
by
whimsicalism
2mo ago
i'm okay with participating in the software patent system for defensive purposes, but agreed that it is very stupid.
66.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
don't disagree, but there is a big difference between 'quantized model/weights' and quantized activations
67.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
deflation will just be inflated away, always
68.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
gpt4o & associated parasociality is considered an alignment failure and is actively trained out of the model, so that is a terrible example of regression
69.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
is this not essentially what ARC-AGI-3 is? i agree that in-context/continual learning is somewhere the models are still mostly weak at
70.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
yes, in fact I recall many people on this exact forum saying that AI will not be able to novel work at all. i can link you likely dozens of comments from people wrong about this replying to me over the last 5 years
71.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
it is very hard for people to eat crow, as the replies will show
72.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
completely false
73.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
I actively think the AI poster looks bad and RLHF reveals the poor taste of the general public.
74.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
what's the zellij plugin?
75.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
extremely HN comment
76.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
I don't fully understand what this is supposed to visualize, but at least for my location it tells me I'd have to run considerably far into golden gate park, which I imagine is negligible in terms of people.
77.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
My understanding is PrEP is also free, but I'm less certain about that post-cuts.
78.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
I was explicitly referring to PEP. I'm not sure why you would make assumptions about where I have or haven't been when you have absolutely no information. PEP remains largely free in SSA post-USAID/PEPFAR cuts.
79.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
Are you serious? I would bank money on PEP being practically free in sub-saharan Africa.
80.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
Still more of a tanh than I've seen in years
81.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
how is 2025 two years ago? GPT-120b is not even close to the biggest recent American release, etc. etc.
82.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
the longer i read this comment the wronger it gets
83.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
It's funny that we've finally returned to tanh activation functions, time is a circle.
84.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
Meta had much higher limits and not restricted merely to token resellers
85.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
LoRA + SFT, but it'll be big - better to wait for a finetuning API from one of the providers, I wouldn't jump straight to RL or off-policy pseudo-RL like DPO.
86.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
> Most governments divisions can't even be bothered to update their websites. Testing and forcing a change in their internal procedures for the sake of security seems unlikely. They'll adapt or they'll die. We are in a new
87.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
I think that is the exact reasoning used wrt to nuclear bombs and it was probably correct
88.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
Dario has assented to a maybe pause if we can somehow get China to stop developing. I do not think he believes there is an actual way to do so though
89.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
i think you need to engage seriously with the arguments they (or at least Anthropic) make for why they are building it — they feel that since it now possible, it will be built and they want to guide it in a positive direction rather than
90.
▲
by
whimsicalism
3mo ago
if you are relying on a model for a business process, it should be simple enough to benchmark on that process
More ›