whatevsbro

26 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by whatevsbro 13y ago

   > I realize I'm sounding shrill and dramatic but… For what it's worth, I think you're sounding like someone who actually thinks about stuff. It's not a bad thing.
2. 182.▲
   by whatevsbro 13y ago

   > why wouldn't the British government see it within its powers to act in what its medical research suggests in the best interest of its people? Should the British government forcibly prevent you from drinking Coca-Cola because it&#x
3. 183.▲
   by whatevsbro 13y ago

   > But in societies that decide their federal system should be arbiter of its health care system, it makes no sense to argue when that government takes measures to act on information regarding the health of its citizens. 1) How did &q
4. 184.▲
   by whatevsbro 13y ago

   > I also think that it's very possible that unrelated "side effects" like surveillance and control of the internet "media" have always been an intended unstated goal. It's not only possible, it's exactl