Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
what
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
73 ms
·
841.
▲
by
what
16y ago
>I can't afford to go with Braintree, and I'm not quite sure they even deal with Canadian companies. There's a link (it's an ajaxy modal window or I'd give the link) on their pricing page for people outside of the US. If you don't have
842.
▲
Ask HN: PayPal's Adaptive Payments API
1 points
by
what
16y ago
|
1 comments
843.
▲
by
what
16y ago
This was operator error right? Hit the "000" button one too many times on that sell.
844.
▲
by
what
16y ago
> True, but this has always been the case. Page connections have always been public. You can still control their visibility on your profile. Don't you think that is a little misleading? You provide users with a privacy control that in r
845.
▲
by
what
16y ago
What did the 0 say to the 8? Nice belt.
846.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Do you want to just find dictionary words based on board configuration and a bench? Typically they build a Directed Acyclic Word Graph from the dictionary and then you can just traverse the graph. So for your example, you start at the H nod
847.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Thanks for clarifying. But I hope they only appear if your posts are public. Otherwise, that's even worse.
848.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Does anyone know the firm that makes all the chrome ads? They're awesome.
849.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Most of these points are reasonable for Facebook. They're just saying that if you don't like the idea of the "connections," then don't share any information. At least you've been told that that information will be publicly visible, period.
850.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Yeah, I snipped the first line because I didn't think it applied to Facebook harvesting emails (they asked for your password). Sorry if it was misleading.
851.
▲
by
what
16y ago
I'm with you on this one. I like to understand how things work and how other people approach certain problems. You can find new tricks to add to your bag. Which is also why I like to reinvent the wheel. Waste of time? Maybe, if you don't wa
852.
▲
by
what
16y ago
I would agree that on their own grades are poor filter. You could have less than stellar grades, but may have something else to show your ability (side projects or what not). On the other hand, a high GPA might only demonstrate your mastery
853.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Yeah, that effort could be put to something more productive :) ...I should get back to work.
854.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Interesting. The thread certainly makes it seem like it will be mutually beneficial. Maybe Facebook is a little less evil than I think, considering they gave a heads up.
855.
▲
by
what
16y ago
5.3 ... You specifically agree not to access (or attempt to access) any of the Services through any automated means (including use of scripts or web crawlers) and shall ensure that you comply with the instructions set out in any robots.txt
856.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Hmmm, so anything goes as long as people still have to go to Facebook.com to get their updates.
857.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Ok, I've never read their terms of service, until now. I'm guessing they have provided credit to the actual authors with a link to the original article and included a licensing notice? (not on Facebook)
858.
▲
by
what
16y ago
> Facebook claims that Power's tool violates criminal law because Facebook's terms of service ban users from accessing their information through "automatic means." So what is the point of the Open Graph then? Doesn't that allow me to ac
859.
▲
by
what
16y ago
I thought everything Zuckerberg ever built was based on scraping other peoples' data. Even now, didn't they pull info from Wikipedia for their pages about your interests?
860.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Most blogs probably aren't designed by professionals. Likely Joe Blogger's friend who thinks they have an eye for style and can whip up a wordpress theme. The small tags are part of the original article that he scraped. Either way, it's odd
861.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Designers don't have to use the site, so they probably just try and make it look pretty. But usability should trump aesthetics. If you're designing a blog, you should design it to be readable. That means a decent font size, no distracting g
862.
▲
by
what
16y ago
I think the chaining issue is just that it takes more work for you to setup. But maybe someone who knows what they're talking about can give you more info.
863.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Ah, thanks. I wonder why they list Ireland in the country selection if they won't ship there.
864.
▲
by
what
16y ago
No experience, but there was a recent Ask HN about the same. This response says something about GoDaddy's certificates vs more expensive ones: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1308619 Not sure if that helps you any.
865.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Where does it say what countries they ship to? I couldn't see any such information on the site.
866.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Sure, but I would think that knowing what people are searching for is more valuable. Also, based on a quick scan on alexa.com, the top 100 (global) sites are a mix of search engines, social networks, news and porn sites. I doubt the search
867.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Well this should be in the related articles: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/us-governmen... Losses from piracy are grossly over estimated. One download of pirated content does not equate to a lost sale.
868.
▲
by
what
16y ago
> Google’s data on each visitor pales in comparison to Facebook. But how useful is Facebook's data really (serious question)? Apart from age, gender and maybe location (which is likely accurate). People like/share/become a fan of so muc
869.
▲
by
what
16y ago
Yeah, readability is good. The pictures mostly bother me because I do most of my browsing on an 11 inch monitor.
870.
▲
by
what
16y ago
It's even worse now. I've noticed a trend of starting articles/blog posts with giant, irrelevant/unnecessary pictures and the actual content ends up below the fold. I want to read the article not look at a picture.
More ›