wewtyflakes

5 ms·

61.
by wewtyflakes 6mo ago
I think you're programed to stir the pot, beep boop.
62.
by wewtyflakes 6mo ago
Yes, deny your eyes and ears, your masters love that. Enjoy the ashes.
63.
by wewtyflakes 6mo ago
I don't want the country led by a malicious, bad-faith, sex predator, I don't care which side they are on; there is no amount of gas-lighting you can do to distract from that, no matter how much you want it to not be true.
64.
by wewtyflakes 6mo ago
Remember posts like this and how they are so glib in the face of the autocracy. They will gaslight you, make you feel like you are the crazy one, and be the first to say you deserved it when you have finally have had enough and decided to p
65.
by wewtyflakes 6mo ago
Very large, critical, assumptions were made in that video ("US/China/Europe will collapse!") and then he hand-waved away when pressed for evidence ("because its obvious!").
66.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
If Copilot later adds a feature like "Scan your repo for vulnerabilities using Copilot <opt-out>", then that would both fit your criteria, and the baiting outrage of the original poster, in one swoop! Of course, Microsoft wo
67.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
Agreed. I lazy-load NVM to get around that: lazy_nvm() { unset -f nvm node npm npx [ -s "$NVM_DIR/nvm.sh" ] && . "$NVM_DIR/nvm.sh" } nvm() { lazy_nvm; nvm "$@"; } node() { l
68.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
I think the AI would be exceptionally good at support, especially for a codebase that it owns, but you are right about compliance.
69.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
That's for signaling purposes, not for functional purposes. Who is buying SaaS for signaling purposes over function?
70.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
I feel this way as well. There was a moment in time several years ago where I would see the alt-meat burgers in restaurants and so I would order them from time-to-time because they tasted fine and it didn't kill a cow. Now I hardly see
71.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
I mean, literally so in a democracy, no? You could argue 'we' (whoever that is) do not live in a democracy, but to say that a plurality of voices do not matter in a democracy seems wrong at face-value.
72.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
How does this disprove the other person's point? Is there a hair being split in a way that is material to the spirit of the argument?
73.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
Globally, the weather of regions is changing.
74.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
Hard yes; I do absolutely do not want to live in a society that is held together with cameras instead of people. By all means please enforce the law, but it should be done by people in a court, not by some auto-citation by mail.
75.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
How China frames victory and how the US frames victory needn't agree, and likely wouldn't. That being said, framing victory as only counting if there is a wholesale land invasion seems odd, as I suspect neither side would want to
76.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
Your own source affirms the other person's point, not yours; switch to the table view and sort by absolute change.
77.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
So your argument that this statement by them: "If you live in a region that usually was 90F in the summer and is now >110F regularly, that’s going to cause problem." is hyperbole, then? Okay, going with that, what temperature r
78.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
Their argument is not predicated on a 20F+ temp rise globally; their argument is about regions.
79.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
Because we should hold the most powerful people to the highest standard, not the lowest one.
80.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
Agreed, it is creepy and I tell people to take them off if they come to my home.
81.
by wewtyflakes 7mo ago
I think that since the input modalities are (seemingly) restricted to eye movement and sound, that it is impractical to replace a phone, where someone can engage privately.
82.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
I think it signals to other people that they should not feel alone in that "this is all **ed up". To that, I appreciated the comment.
83.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
It seems weird to equivocate the capabilities of "ai" in 1979 to what we have now; clearly it is on a different level.
84.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
What does that have to do with the article? It is not about 'the most life changing thing for everyone', it was what was life changing for her.
85.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
I think the things you are describing would make running a refinery economical, and I am sure at some price some community would be thrilled to have a refinery. Good for them, still glad its not here.
86.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
I'm fine if other states want to ban them too. I'm also fine if ultimately running oil refineries is uneconomical. I do not care if this is nimbyism; other communities are free to set their own rules.
87.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
I do not care to try to make things ethically fair for oil refineries. Call me a hypocrite, I do not care, as these companies similarly do not care. "Ya got me!", yup, moving on, I am still glad oil refineries are effectively bann
88.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
So no new car paint shops or oil refineries? I'm okay with that.
89.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
The job security perk was recently defenestrated.
90.
by wewtyflakes 8mo ago
Do you think that AI has magic guardrails that force it to obey the laws everywhere, anywhere, all the time? How would this even be possible for laws that conflict with eachother?

More ›