webwanderings

248 ms·

991.
by webwanderings 15y ago
I like their weekly email newsletter. It is curated well for the best content. I don't use the service or visit their site.
992.
Twitter: A Lost and Found service for the world(metronews.ca)
1 points by webwanderings 15y ago|0 comments
993.
by webwanderings 15y ago
I've been using RSS for long and I don't see not using it in any near future. I use a combination of Brief ( http://brief.mozdev.org/ ) and Google Reader.
994.
by webwanderings 15y ago
Whoaa...I am not very technical, but the first question that comes to mind is, what would be a difference between this and what Tor attempts to accomplish?
995.
by webwanderings 15y ago
I'd rather they make it as a simple enough choice (a check box or something). There are privacy implications of auto-complete and I personally believe Firefox is accurate in not enabling it by default.
996.
by webwanderings 15y ago
For my use, I measured my memory usage on both Firefox and Chrome (with whatever little number of tabs I keep open daily), and I found that the memory usage on both Firefox and Chrome is exactly the same. So I don't bother with Google and r
997.
by webwanderings 15y ago
auto-complete is there in Firefox, it is just not there by default.
998.
by webwanderings 15y ago
One can also forget the bookmarks if they're local to you, as in Firefox. Plus they're backed up through Sync. This just in case when you can no longer rely on Delicious, or Google for that matter.
999.
by webwanderings 15y ago
The 800 pound gorilla that Google is, forcing everyone to go Social, isn't targeting tech-aware communities on the Internet. They know they wouldn't go anywhere if they were to just target the tech-aware public. So, the comment above is in
1000.
by webwanderings 15y ago
This is basically for wordpress.com users who purchase something from Automattic (domain) to sell something to the world (Ads). There is no indication on what you, the blogger on wordpress.com, may be earning in return for this transaction
1001.
by webwanderings 15y ago
How's that a privacy concern? Imagine a gmail user in your address book who has not signed up for Plus or you don't care about that person. He/she would be seeing your Plus feed unintentionally. Of course your feed is public in the first pl
1002.
by webwanderings 15y ago
This is an old news. G+ integrated your feed into Gmail a while back. Another one of the privacy concerns.
1003.
by webwanderings 15y ago
That's exactly what I've been saying. I don't understand why I should use Google Plus, in fact I don't anymore and I don't really think I am missing anything. I don't understand why I should plus one anything or share anything. What's in it
1004.
by webwanderings 15y ago
You see, G+ is doing exactly what Facebook does. The brands are basically duplicating their efforts for social interaction. I don't see any difference between how FB treats page creation versus Google Plus.
1005.
by webwanderings 15y ago
You mean Facebook over Google? I don't prefer it, but that's where most of the average Internet users are.
1006.
by webwanderings 15y ago
I got on board early, hoping that friends and family will eventually move over from Facebook. A handful did in the beginning but eventually I realized that nobody is moving from Facebook. I eventually turned my G+ off completely. I think
1007.
The OS Wars: We Have A Winner(sourceforge.net)
55 points by webwanderings 15y ago|37 comments
1008.
by webwanderings 15y ago
How does creating a contact group in Gmail connects it to a SMS number? I am curious.