wdiamond

7 ms·

31.
by wdiamond 6y ago
nice work, but I don't like compressed programming style. hard to maintain.
32.
by wdiamond 6y ago
sounds like the writer becoming the typist and the typist getting famous as writer.
33.
by wdiamond 7y ago
all-in-one is a brand. there is no real all-in-one.
34.
by wdiamond 7y ago
there is no rush to kill play store or apple store. ms could relaunch a windows phone but ms do not want to waste in consumer hardware, it's better to them invest on other types of "OS's" like github, azure, xboxlive, wh
35.
by wdiamond 7y ago
you are saying that everything was from async to sync. not everybody agree. btw you can write a sync if you want. and node is not a language, neither javascript, the language name is ecmascript. the problem is yours, save your own utils, if
36.
by wdiamond 7y ago
See something awesome and long run for It.
37.
by wdiamond 8y ago
The easier you learn the wastefull it is. I mean, brainfuck language can be more usefull than another c style programming language. stick to meanings not syntaxes.
38.
by wdiamond 8y ago
try start with this: https://github.com/bulletphysics/bullet3 there are others. google it. to perfect physics you must understand the real math of physics, but it probably won't fit in a game. game physics librar
39.
by wdiamond 8y ago
I loved the syntax, but I do prefer automatic gc. I also have some ideas for classes in this schema. something like class Big Car extends Car, Chassi and Engine :{ move {THIS} {attrib} by {offset} :{ set {THIS} [attrib] to o
40.
by wdiamond 8y ago
neither. it's a prototype. can't scale yet. nor its endorsed by govs. a prototype car usually don't have seat belts. and you need gov to take care of roads.
41.
by wdiamond 9y ago
javascript too pop to be noticed.
42.
by wdiamond 9y ago
Recursive, you have everything you want. but if you have, how the hell you want? to have and to want will never be the same, cause to want is to work for a new objective. and to have is to rest by the previous objective completed. if you do
43.
by wdiamond 9y ago
I recommend to keep open source, but not to clear issues related to other people infrastructure, just about your own infrastructure.
44.
by wdiamond 9y ago
I recommend to keep open source, but not clear issues not related to your own infrastructure.
45.
by wdiamond 9y ago
I wish javascript could handle operator overload. not only basic operator, also any custom. something like: objectClass.prototype.operator like = function(a,b) {...} objectClass3 = objectClass1 like objectClass2; Object.defineOperator(objec
46.
by wdiamond 9y ago
a medice college, with brain specialization, then invest on human-computer interface(but wisely and slowly), it requires experience that no one has(one might call but it is not experience when you cannot write a undergraduate textbook).
47.
by wdiamond 9y ago
there are no such thing of waste of time, except when you delete code. if you have a basic design that code can be used for prototypes. if you have a complex design that code will take your time to handle complex. but if you can't hand
48.
by wdiamond 9y ago
just go c and javascript. or javascript and c. some prefer lua and c, or c and lua.
49.
by wdiamond 9y ago
IRL you can't link objective complete to rewards automatically, it requires human eval. which is too expensive.
50.
by wdiamond 9y ago
What are you looking for?
51.
by wdiamond 10y ago
if that was ironic, I would tell that some people need money but don't need to share implementations.
52.
by wdiamond 10y ago
pay me 1000 bucks for that information. 2000 bucks for more.