wdewind

97 ms·

931.
by wdewind 13y ago
I suppose both? I think it's pretty reasonable to expect a business dealing with storing sensitive data to not look at that data, regardless of it is email or logs.
932.
by wdewind 13y ago
Do you ever email about this data or put it into spreadsheets on Google's servers?
933.
by wdewind 13y ago
Stop using nagios, all you have to do is string together 6 random pieces of software, 2 of which don't exist yet!
934.
by wdewind 13y ago
This is great, and does not only apply to Rails. In many other frameworks it's common to lump business logic in controllers instead of models. Either way you end up with the same thing: eventually you'll need to add a 4th (at le
935.
by wdewind 13y ago
Yikes.
936.
by wdewind 13y ago
When I click any sort I get brought to a blank page with javascript:null
937.
by wdewind 13y ago
I don't think this fixes what is the core issue with infinite scroll: when I click into a subview and then press back, I am not returned to the same place where I was before. iOS, for instance, handles this extremely well by literally
938.
by wdewind 13y ago
> Yeah, but no doctors asked about my stress, or emotional health, or anything that could have started me down the line of investigation. That's pretty shocking. Even a family GP should be asking about that stuff. I've never
939.
by wdewind 13y ago
I think there are a ton of different situations, and certainly sometimes unpaid internships can be exploitative, but I wouldn't agree that by definition they are. Either way, our article is more about the legal issues than the ethical
940.
by wdewind 13y ago
Haha, generally speaking that's not bad advice, but there are some times when it's ok to not pay them (article talks about those). Sorry about the site, working on getting it back up! Edit: and we're back!
941.
by wdewind 13y ago
Hi HN, At Justworks we specialize in payroll, benefits and compliance. We know a lot of startups want to hire interns and are confused about whether or not you need to pay them. We wrote a small guide to help you determine when you're
942.
Hiring Interns the Legal Way(justworks.com)
19 points by wdewind 13y ago|15 comments
943.
by wdewind 13y ago
> Another way to put it: If the market is really that small that one small startup can take away business from another small startup, then you don't have much of a market at all, and you should find a larger market. This is true but
944.
by wdewind 13y ago
No, they make it extremely clear that the numbers are old in the article, and then give a pretty generous extrapolated figure.
945.
by wdewind 13y ago
Can you explain that graph? I have no idea what I'm looking at. Where are these fees going?
946.
by wdewind 13y ago
I understand it's not extortion. You'll note I never said it was extortion. I also understand how it protects the reporter. I'm not asking the reporter to take responsibility or do anything that would harm them, I'm ask
947.
by wdewind 13y ago
Yeah, you're right, it's not extortion. That's why I said it's almost extortion. It's certainly pretty tasteless. It is a tactic used by extortioners, and I wouldn't consider doing business with someone who
948.
by wdewind 13y ago
This sounds almost like extortion. I would not suggest doing this with security.
949.
by wdewind 13y ago
The timing distinction you made is particularly interesting. Thanks.
950.
by wdewind 13y ago
Gotcha, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. So wont the FCC just recategorize ISPs as Common Carriers or...?
951.
by wdewind 13y ago
But this still breaks net neutrality. You don't get to treat some traffic differently because it's served by a 501c3.
952.
by wdewind 13y ago
I haven't read the decision, just secondary sources, so I am probably incorrect. The reply above yours linked to: http://recode.net/2014/01/15/whats-net-neutrality-what-happe... Which seems to do a good
953.
by wdewind 13y ago
AFAICT (and please correct me if I'm wrong), the ruling actually disallows the FCC from regulating in anyway at all, including classifying ISPs as common carriers.
954.
by wdewind 13y ago
Coinbase charges 1%. At overstock's volume they are probably getting a similar deal on CCs, although definitely not quite 1%.
955.
by wdewind 13y ago
Overstock isn't taking a risk here: they are getting the same exact USD they got before.
956.
by wdewind 13y ago
I can't find it (sorry) but there's a pretty amazing interview with Carmack floating around about how he apparently has mostly solved this issue. It really drives home just how much of a genius the guy is. Edit: this isn't i
957.
by wdewind 13y ago
Definitely could be a lot of room there. I can't imagine O'Reilly guides are the best way to quickly learn a new language...
958.
by wdewind 13y ago
I would not use this because: -I can't have my company's source code existing in yet another system. It's already in github and after CircleCI's security failure my desire to have another entry point to source code is v
959.
by wdewind 13y ago
Is there any precedent for online petitions doing anything? Ever? Would be happily surprised to learn of something but to my knowledge they have never done anything.
960.
by wdewind 13y ago
I'm replying to you but this is meant for both of the current replies, genuinely curious: What makes you guys think that businesses wont be built around simplifying and derisking BTC transactions? And wont this businesses have fees?

More ›