wbond

32 ms·

271.
by wbond 13y ago
Nice to see we once again have a stable nginx release that supports a version of spdy that browsers currently support!
272.
by wbond 13y ago
I'd say it is used by more than just "thousands" of developers. https://sublime.wbond.net/stats :-D
273.
by wbond 13y ago
It would be great if some of the info from the video was on the page. I was just about to ask questions related to how this differs from the GeekDesks we are using now, before I decided to play through the whole video. After watching the vi
274.
by wbond 13y ago
Except when a security patch comes out and the API changed between security releases and you have to potentially update configuration and fix third-party modules.
275.
by wbond 13y ago
Let me rephrase then: Don't even bother building nginx 1.4 with spdy support or configuring it since no one can use it. From May 2013 until now there was a benefit to end-users. There no longer is. If you want to provide the speed bene
276.
by wbond 13y ago
Well, the difference is that breaking changes are made to 1.5 so when a security update comes out (like today) you have to do regression testing instead of just grabbing and building the latest version.
277.
by wbond 13y ago
You seem intent on arguing about something I have never contested. I just made the (implied) observation that anyone deploying nginx shouldn't even bother enabling spdy in 1.4 (stable) because effectively nothing will use it anymore. I
278.
by wbond 13y ago
Right, so my point stands that it is interesting that current stable browsers don't support current stable web servers. So unless someone has the resources to test and deploy unstable web servers, it effectively means you shouldn'
279.
by wbond 13y ago
Count me as one of those people who doesn't like to have to work around backwards compatibility breaks when installing security patches on production servers. :-) (edit: clarified wording)
280.
by wbond 13y ago
Interesting to see that now the current stable versions of Chrome and Firefox have dropped spdy/2, which is the only version of spdy supported by the current stable version of nginx. And nginx is the server used by more than 90% of hos
281.
by wbond 13y ago
I started using lua(jit) with nginx over the past year, with more work recently. The work by agentzh[1] with the lua nginx module and the openresty stuff was very useful. Being able to tweak the behavior of nginx with a full-featured progra
282.
by wbond 13y ago
Package Control is a far cry from the scale of RubyGems. PC uses a little over 2TB a month, whereas my calculations show RubyGems using around 50TB. That said, early on I chose Linode because of their generous bandwidth that is included wit
283.
by wbond 13y ago
I think a lot of people were expecting it to be open source. I don't have access yet to try it to see how it compares in terms of speed and feel. That said, this information seems to put it more in the category of a reimplementation of
284.
by wbond 13y ago
I don't know if I'd call it extremely limiting… there are some places I'd like to see more accessibility. However, I've built some pretty extensive stuff with it. I would love to see ssl compiled in - I believe the reaso
285.
by wbond 13y ago
I agree - I was only willing to switch to Linux full time once Gnome 3 was released. I find Unity garish and Gnome 2 and KDE to be far too tweak happy with lots of ugly rough edges.
286.
by wbond 13y ago
I'll look into this. I think it is an unfortunate side effect of how english word stemming works. The "all" suffix is trimmed off of Sublimall and it is treated like the root to the word Sublime. I'm planning on adding s
287.
by wbond 13y ago
If you are using more than one platform, this can lead to bugs with packages. See https://sublime.wbond.net/docs/syncing for more info.
288.
by wbond 13y ago
Please see https://sublime.wbond.net/docs/syncing about how you should tweak this if you are using more than one platform.
289.
by wbond 13y ago
Please be aware, using this across platforms can lead to broken packages. Please see https://sublime.wbond.net/docs/syncing for details. Socketubs - you'll need to include my name in the license file since you are
290.
by wbond 13y ago
I specifically mentioned dealing with crappy hosts. PHP's biggest strength is that it is available to almost everyone for cheap. Unfortunately most of those cheap hosts don't support sane extensions. And you certainly aren't
291.
by wbond 13y ago
It is interesting, I experienced a similar feeling to: I don’t want to get caught up in the weeds again, building tools for something I never manage to make. when moving away from PHP as my first language to master. I built large s
292.
by wbond 13y ago
Yes, I found those checkboxes. However, I can see two use-cases: 1. Adding issues: I want to see everything 2. Triaging: I only want to see labels with issues Thus, most of the time I want only those with issues, or all of them
293.
by wbond 13y ago
A link to easily-readable documentation would be nice.
294.
by wbond 13y ago
I like the alternative interface for managing issues, and it is nice that I could use this for some public repos that get a lot of issues and pull requests. One nice enhancement would be a simple toggle for hiding labels with no issues. The
295.
by wbond 13y ago
Recently I've been getting into some C and having programmed in a number of other languages know enough to be sure I wanted to have a solid understanding of properly handling encodings and strings in general. I've obtained a good
296.
by wbond 13y ago
It seems the display can still only run at 30Hz on OS X: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1692329 . However, it does seem you can run two of them off of a 2012 MBPr. Additionally, you can save $1000 by purchasing
297.
by wbond 13y ago
I understand the reason for picking GPL for the editor. The, rather large, downside I see to this is that effectively all plugins are now GPL, correct? I run a small side business sell packages for Sublime Text and considered the concept of
298.
by wbond 13y ago
I would presume most people who are writing 3.x code have written 2.x code before, or don't care about 2.x. I personally have gotten used to the syntax that works in both, and tend to write my code in the most compatible manner possibl
299.
by wbond 13y ago
You got me curious about grapheme matching in Python with regex. It looks like it is not in the stdlib yet with 3.3. However, it you install https://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex and then replace: import re with
300.
by wbond 13y ago
Oh, I see the issue here. You are expecting the string class to function via graphemes rather than characters. It should be possible to implement grapheme support since character support is there, but I imagine the reverse is not true. A li

More ›