wbakst

6 ms·

31.
by wbakst 2y ago
Love this! The style is unique and awesome. I see the beginnings of a really fun way to learn / practice / remember SQL. A few notes: - Would be cool if it was a single workspace (no tabs). Was constantly switching tabs back and f
32.
by wbakst 2y ago
Yeah we built support for MCP as part of the existing library that contains other LLM related abstractions
33.
by wbakst 2y ago
super cool! excited for the release and to see how you’re using Mirascope!
34.
by wbakst 2y ago
I hope Mirascope makes it easy! What are you building?
35.
by wbakst 2y ago
this is exactly what i wanted thank you thank you
36.
by wbakst 2y ago
honestly i like the HN UI as-is, the thing i would want would be some form of email / notification update when someone comments on a post i either submitted or commented on etc. not sure if something like that already exists :shrug:
37.
by wbakst 2y ago
+1 this was exactly what i came to comment
38.
by wbakst 2y ago
You got it!
39.
by wbakst 2y ago
Unfortunately not quite :( You can definitely have them generate tools for APIs on the fly, but it’s not nearly robust enough yet
40.
by wbakst 2y ago
Best part of MCP is that it’ll just work with anything else that supports it (like Claude, Cursor, etc.)
41.
by wbakst 2y ago
I won’t tell Jason…
42.
by wbakst 2y ago
We have some docs for local / OSS models: https://mirascope.com/learn/local_models/ You can also set a custom client to use any model that’s compatible with e.g. OpenAI: https://mirascope.com/
43.
by wbakst 2y ago
We released the first version of Mirascope in Dec 2023. I’m under the impression that would make it the right date?
44.
by wbakst 2y ago
This put such a big smile on my face! “Abstractions that aren’t obstructions” is always the goal, feels good to hear you say we’ve hit that sweet spot :)
45.
by wbakst 2y ago
sweeeeet love that it's supported, standardization for the win!
46.
by wbakst 2y ago
if they support MCP servers it should work! can't guarantee as i haven't tried connecting them myself
47.
by wbakst 2y ago
Totally! When it was first released, I really liked the idea, but it felt super early (which is to be expected!) I immediately wanted to write a custom agent that used an MCP server and that inspired building this. Glad you like it!
48.
Show HN: Simple to build MCP servers that easily connect with custom LLM calls(mirascope.com)
57 points by wbakst 2y ago|25 comments
49.
by wbakst 2y ago
super sketchy that they chose to remove it seemingly knowing it was necessary...
50.
by wbakst 2y ago
+1 I also figured that the "open" in the name implied it would be open-source, but that does not seem to be the case, so I'm not sure what is "open" about this. All-in-all no idea what this does
51.
by wbakst 2y ago
RL on "Wait, but..." == emergent reasoning and improved capabilities. Wild
52.
by wbakst 2y ago
this is super cool! where did you get the data for the chart?
53.
by wbakst 2y ago
are there any examples of using this with the anthropic API to build something like Claude Desktop? the docs aren't super clear yet wrt. how one might actually implement the connection. do we need to implement another set of tools to p
54.
by wbakst 2y ago
wrote a markdown doc explaining it as well: https://docs.mirascope.io/latest/cookbook/langgraph_vs_miras...
55.
Show HN: Web search chatbot with tool interrupt and human-in-the-loop in 130 loc(github.com)
1 points by wbakst 2y ago|1 comments
56.
by wbakst 2y ago
I hope so too :)
57.
by wbakst 2y ago
Ok I think I understand better now. In my mind there are two separate discussion points here: 1. How necessary is it to engineer a prompt for a specific model vs. build with the expectation that models will get better and better and require
58.
by wbakst 2y ago
Can you elaborate? What do you mean that the prompt format should be a property of the model? There's nothing stopping you from tuning the prompt in your prompt template to a specific task, and if you want to further tune to a specific
59.
by wbakst 2y ago
Hadn't seen magentic before this comment, super cool! Would love to do a comparison blog post -- I'll reach out about this separately :) re: scope: I think anything one layer above the base provider API is definitely in scope. A l
60.
by wbakst 2y ago
Hi! library author here. Happy to answer any questions. Thanks for taking a look!

More ›