Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wavemode
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
301.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
But it was a severance agreement. She accepted a sum of money for agreeing to not disparage. You don't see anything wrong with someone knowingly accepting these funds, and then turning around and immediately violating the agreement b
302.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
If I know anything about the Python community - that new runtime would simply never gain significant traction, due to the incompatibility.
303.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
This is (no offense) intellectually dishonest. Nobody wants the risk to be zero. What we want is that, if there is a specific KNOWN flaw in a life-critical system, that the flaw is addressed and the shuttle re-tested before humans are place
304.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
You're reading something into my comment which isn't there. Hard to say what it is, but it's causing me to not really understand what you're talking about, at this point. Maybe you thought I was disparaging Vietnam for d
305.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
Parent commenter is making a joke about the fact that, in the title "SpaceX Files to Go Public", the word "Files" could be read as either a noun or a verb.
306.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
I'm not talking about a foreign invasion on us, I'm talking about invading the foreigners (in this case, Iran).
307.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
You can have user-defined operators with plain old recursive descent. Consider if you had functions called parse_user_ops_precedence_1, parse_user_ops_precedence_2, etc. These would simply take a table of user-defined operators as an argume
308.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
Well, regardless of technology, the space of things you can accomplish without risking your own troops' lives is very small. (Unless you're willing to go nuclear, which has the pesky downside of ending the world.) To put it in per
309.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
well yeah I wasn't even talking about professional use, since I think in professional use cases it will turn out make a lot more sense to set up APIs that AIs, use, than to set up screen scraping and mouse+keyboard use. in fact even in
310.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
AI (that is, plain chat) is always going to be free to use as well. Google and Microsoft are going to keep it that way. And make the money back via ads. That's why ChatGPT still has a free option. If they didn't, they would lose a
311.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
tbh I don't think this use case is going to be as big as people seem to think there are a lot of reasons, but in brief - I think AI desktop use is a product that the average person isn't going to get much value out of. to make an
312.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
people used to say this about search engines and web browsers, as well regardless, eventually Google became the universal default for both. When it comes to software, the average person doesn't shop around for the technologically optim
313.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
Even if there were, it wouldn't be very useful. In a "common law" system like the US, legal questions are rarely answered purely by the plain text of a law. You also need case law - that is, how the law is typically applied i
314.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
I don't see this as a "modern" vs "back in the day" thing. The real reason many software orgs nowadays don't have QA is for the simple reason that it's slow. Everything in the consumer tech space is about
315.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
Is 7 extra percent on HLE benchmark really worth the cost of running an entire ensemble of models?
316.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
Philosophers rejoice.
317.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
There's plenty of results in math and physics that are true, in the sense that the math checks out, but are useless, in the sense that the authors claim they've made a breakthrough, but actually they've just tweaked a few par
318.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
Ever heard the phrase "the market can remain irrational for longer than you can remain solvent"?
319.
▲
by
wavemode
6mo ago
I still don't see what the big deal is. If LLMs are (or become) all they're cracked up to be, it shouldn't matter whether someone "learns to use the tools" today or tomorrow or five years from now. In fact they shou
320.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
Also got 100% (Presonus Eris + sub), but I had to struggle . Especially on The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. I would never know the difference during casual listening. Only in this setting where I'm told upfront that there is a differen
321.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
> dnf < 5 was still performing similarly to yum (and it was also implemented in python) I'm perhaps not properly understanding your comment. If the algorithmic changes were responsible for the improved speed, why did the Python v
322.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
tbh this sounds revisionist... I don't recall anyone saying that any of those services "wouldn't work". Uber I suppose is one where people thought they might run into regulatory problems, and with some of those companies
323.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
Most people complaining about uptime aren't free users or open-source developers. It's people whose companies are enterprise GitHub customers. It's a real problem and affects productivity.
324.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
> I would probably score about the same, does this prove I also rely on training data memorization rather than genuine programming reasoning? Setting aside whether this benchmark is meaningful or not - the argument you're making is
325.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
No, because in those cases you're still a user of gmail. When you tell people your email address, or send people email, and it contains "@gmail.com", you're still implicitly advertising for Google. From Google's per
326.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
I wouldn't even call this a Turing test, in the traditional sense. This commenter claims to have recently read several papers on this topic, and I'm curious what papers those are. If these papers don't exist, this commenter&#
327.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
Can you cite which papers you're referring to?
328.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
Taking the opposite side of this bet feels like a free 19% return on your money.
329.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
I don't think the quote itself is responsible for any of that. It's true that premature optimization (that is, optimization before you've measured the software and determined whether the optimization is going to make any real
330.
▲
by
wavemode
7mo ago
That... doesn't happen. More likely it's an indentation in your scalp.
More ›