watwut

8 ms·

91.
by watwut 1mo ago
> Especially Dario, who speaks about moral high ground and fate of humanity all day, yet it's not that different from a cult leader does. He sells to Palantir. He is against regulatory change that would make Ai labs liable. His ide
92.
by watwut 1mo ago
He is right. Democracy is not compatible with unlimited freedom for him. There are laws. The differencd is that I see Thiels freedom limited a little as a good thing.
93.
by watwut 1mo ago
The way they operate? No sane insurer. But the whole point is changing their behavior. > The problem is that the potential liabilities arguably vastly exceed what these companies can absorb It is ok. Fines should not be just a cost of bu
94.
by watwut 1mo ago
AI is not a child. It is a machine. If you connect it to something that can be used to kill people, you just created a gun or an equivalent of a bomb. Yes, people kill people and use ai as tool. If you unleash a drone that will fly to a ran
95.
by watwut 1mo ago
They are hostile enemies and not just selfish assholes. Openly and publically so. And they have actual tangible successes.
96.
by watwut 1mo ago
LLM dont have concept of right and wrong. They "did not knew they did something wrong" they followed the prompts loop given to them.
97.
by watwut 1mo ago
So like, "AI is comming for the Houti jobs" is new twist for "it will replace all film makers"?
98.
by watwut 1mo ago
Some people are schooled in farming. Farming is not some kind of lost knowledge people dont practice anymore.
99.
by watwut 1mo ago
They were literally doing exploit gym.
100.
by watwut 1mo ago
> Has our distrust in western companies really gotten to the point they'd rather unfiltered Astra level capabilities in the hands of every hostile government and terrorist organisation than potentially do any form of regulation in c
101.
by watwut 1mo ago
A company that sells to Palantier is not "good hands".
102.
by watwut 1mo ago
Even if they changed in between and assuming harness and loop prompter counra as part of LLM ... that comment 100% rings true for 2022. Why would that person not stand by that? Conversely, if someone exaggerated 2022 models capabilities in
103.
by watwut 1mo ago
At this point, I worry a lot more of billionaires Musk, Altman, Thiel etc then of goverments in general. Thrir project is to get all power and if they succeed, it will be way worst then what we have seen so far.
104.
by watwut 1mo ago
But Thiel wants people enslaved and Musk wants then killed. Altman wants them "obsolete" which means desolation. AfD wants people dead. Right wing men wants women without rights and docile. I could go on ...
105.
by watwut 1mo ago
Of course most creators actually enjoy craft, do enjoy compliments and find them motivating ... and need money and want money. There is no special introspection requires, unless you are signing up for "all people are one-dimensional si
106.
by watwut 1mo ago
Ok, but that one is easy to solve already. We just need to apply existing laws to OpenAI engineers, managers and leadership. Once few of those are in jail for felony hacking or criminal negligence, their AI will magically stop gpimg roque a
107.
by watwut 1mo ago
Yeah, but actual roque threat is the US based AI. China is building their AI for business, military and goverment reasons. It is eventually bound to be good at that. American companies do it to build an independent AI god that is going to k
108.
by watwut 1mo ago
> required for the Navier-Stokes problem. Is that the one they stole?
109.
by watwut 1mo ago
Maybe we should drone bomb all the datacenters then? Or just turn off the electricity. Or maybe just do a deep financial audit of all involved companies and investors. Really go into it with a bunch of motivated white collar crime prosecuto
110.
by watwut 1mo ago
None of that involved western soldiers running away from fight or being misled to leave the fight. So, again, what are you talking about here?
111.
by watwut 1mo ago
> This may seem like a small thing, but a series of misteps and chronic failure to adequately advocate for users is what has led us to the toxic waste dump that so much of the Internet has become today. I think it is both monopolization
112.
by watwut 1mo ago
Maybe they should not bribe Trump in the first place. You give money to a crook to help him prior election, it is only fair for him to cheat on you.
113.
by watwut 1mo ago
What are you talking about here, exactly?
114.
by watwut 1mo ago
Actually, it always actively suppressed content owners found repetitive or annoying. Openly so, the moderator would even state it is being done. It is simply part of moderation. And then there is flagging where certain content grts flagged
115.
by watwut 1mo ago
From my observations, it seems to be kind of hit and miss. Sometimes they trade, he takes money amd do what was asked. Other times, he takes money and dont do what was asked. We dont have to imagine this. We kind of see both variants in the
116.
by watwut 1mo ago
Is that even a good faith question? It is not like it was an obscure word.
117.
by watwut 1mo ago
None of these is cheating: Asking older friends about what to expect from tests. Asking older friends about how to approach a difficult assignment. Reading older assignments to see how they got their grades. Getting carried on a group proje
118.
by watwut 1mo ago
> 's always been my understanding that virtually everyone cheats Not true. The "have someone else writing my work" is rather massive level of cheating and not at all a routine thing everyone does.
119.
by watwut 1mo ago
I agree that "some controversial views that many find distasteful" is not the same as being fascist. And well, DHH is fascist.
120.
by watwut 1mo ago
I just dont think these guy are even capable to plan that much.

More ›