watty

197 ms·

1. 841.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   Yep, I get excited for all the Ubuntu releases but end up back on Windows a couple weeks later.
2. 842.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   True or false: "Adobe is also scrambling to make Flash competitive with the emerging HTML5"
3. 843.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   I just use ColorCop and drag the slider up and down to change luminosity. That "ribbon" design is becoming popular... http://0to255.com/ http://blog.metalabdesign.com/ http://www.movenetworks.com/
4. 844.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   I disagree with (1) and (2) - why would Apple want to limit Apps? It seems to me that App #'s are one of the biggest things the iPhone has on its competitors and they don't want anyone to catch up. Android nearly doubled it's Apps accepte
5. 845.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   This proves HTML5 has a very long ways to go before replacing all 3rd party plugins.
6. 846.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   But I don't see the "quality" concerns that Jobs sees. Do you? Do you think it could be an excuse to maintain control over the development process and to hurt the Adobe CS5 release? They have a review process which is used for quality con
7. 847.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   After what we've seen lately it seems that many Apple users WOULD love it. The end users are the ones here getting hurt by these grudges - why can't they see it? There are great Unity3D, Appcelerator, and Flash apps that will never be mad
8. 848.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   I don't really look for it but I noticed earlier today that ESPN/ESPN360 use Flash. Also most porn sites use Flash and nearly all game sites use Flash (jayisgames.com is one of my top 5 sites). For me, those 3 above limitations make the fl
9. 849.▲
   by watty 17y ago

   Good point. How easy will it be to edit the output to add the different browser "hacks" to make sure it renders similar across different browsers?
10. 850.▲
    by watty 17y ago

    Adobe does specialize in IDEs. They don't make money selling the Flash player but it was a requirement at the time because no other technology allowed them to create rich content. It'll be interesting to see if this works with advanced ani
11. 851.▲
    by watty 17y ago

    Not an iPhone developer and I disagree with it. It seems ObjC iPhone devs will be happy since it means less competition for them. As a user, you should be pissed though since you WILL miss out on quality Unity3d, Appcelerator, and Flash a
12. 852.▲
    by watty 17y ago

    I haven't even heard of some of these Myths. "Apple owes Adobe a living"? "Adobe's gonna get Apple"? I see consoles as a completely different topic. The iPhone allows any developer to sign up and develop (for example, that 9 year old kid
13. 853.▲
    by watty 17y ago

    This would require some major development time and give devs another reason to work on the iPhone. IMO, they would be better off devoting the time in solidifying Flash 10.1 mobile and compatibility across non-iPhone devices.
14. 854.▲
    by watty 17y ago

    I always cringe when I have to download something off of Rapidshare. What's the benefit over torrents?
15. 855.▲
    by watty 17y ago

    I'd like to see a quote from Microsoft... aren't there other non-exclusive XBLA games like Braid and Peggle?
16. 856.▲
    by watty 17y ago

    How does he know this? It seems like a MAJOR stretch to me. If they only want to increase quality of apps why aren't they more strict in the review process? Why have they allowed 60+ fart apps? To say all Flash/Unity/Appcelerator apps a